Mach 1 vs dumdumdumdumdum
03-26-2008, 02:15 PM
#63
You didn't read the fourth word in my statement did you?
If you TRULY believe machs are mid to high 13s...You are by every definition Ignorant. mid to high 13s is A4 times....not M5. Try comparing apples to apples. And yes...you are correct in trap speed...Machs are generally 2 mph less..but if you think that is enough to win anywhere anytime....then you are most certainly ignorant and I would advise you eat that cookie before you say anything else ignorant about machs.....I'm sure it tastes better than your 'cheerios' and your own 'foot'.
If you TRULY believe machs are mid to high 13s...You are by every definition Ignorant. mid to high 13s is A4 times....not M5. Try comparing apples to apples. And yes...you are correct in trap speed...Machs are generally 2 mph less..but if you think that is enough to win anywhere anytime....then you are most certainly ignorant and I would advise you eat that cookie before you say anything else ignorant about machs.....I'm sure it tastes better than your 'cheerios' and your own 'foot'.
Coys just pissed that he would get schooled by a 4 door 4 cylinder POS.
03-26-2008, 02:16 PM
#64
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just speaking from experience. Back when i had an LS1 firehawk i ran a guy in a mach. Both factory stock and i walked him pretty bad in 3rd.
03-26-2008, 02:19 PM
#66
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You truely are the ignorant one I guess, from a roll or a dig the LS1 is faster period. Does that mean Joe Blow in one will beat a Mach everytime?? No. Equal drivers LS1 wins everytime, thats just facts. LS1 driver isnt as good as Mach driver, Mach wins. Whats so hard about it??
Coys just pissed that he would get schooled by a 4 door 4 cylinder POS.
Coys just pissed that he would get schooled by a 4 door 4 cylinder POS.
03-26-2008, 02:22 PM
#67
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is it so hard to people to accept these cars are freaking neck and neck? (and I have said it dozens of times.....the LSF has the edge on a roll)
03-26-2008, 02:25 PM
#68
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tell you what....when cars drive themselves we can have that debate. Until then, let's keep driver involved in the discussion, shall we? Fact is...from a dig the ETs are EXTREMELY close....MPH...2-4mph (generally). I've owned two machs...you really think I'm that ignorant about them? I'm not blind by other performance either. Can't beat your competition if you don't know anything about them.
03-26-2008, 02:27 PM
#69
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ANy type of roll race?...r u serious?
See below..as stated above:
ONe race guys...one race. I rarely refer to the roll race I had with an M6 Z...why?...cause it is one race (well....one car, one driver). How can you base one race as the norm?....that is ludacris. BTW - that race was with an SLP M6 Z against my Ex's 295RWHP mach......we did it several times...we were both within a fender of each other (not to mention the 'one time' I pulled half a car because of his short shift). I can guarantee you the mach weighed more too...(mostly cause of me HAHA).
Why is it so hard to people to accept these cars are freaking neck and neck? (and I have said it dozens of times.....the LSF has the edge on a roll)
03-26-2008, 02:28 PM
#70
If we are going to keep driver in the race as part of saying which car is faster then Mach 1s could be faster than Enzos.
Of course its a "drivers" race. Just like GTOs, Machs, Cobras, Vettes, f bodies, STis, EVOs etc............
Anyone of those can beat the others.
Of course its a "drivers" race. Just like GTOs, Machs, Cobras, Vettes, f bodies, STis, EVOs etc............
Anyone of those can beat the others.
03-26-2008, 02:29 PM
#72
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-26-2008, 02:30 PM
#73
Yep..been quite the busy person lately.
6100??...GOOD GOD man....yep...3/10s... shift higher. 2.0 isn't bad on street tires, esp. on your first run. You wont' break an axle with street tires...your more likely to wear the clutch out slipping.
THat would be nice....but get some DRs, or you'll spin like a bottle at a frat party.
6100??...GOOD GOD man....yep...3/10s... shift higher. 2.0 isn't bad on street tires, esp. on your first run. You wont' break an axle with street tires...your more likely to wear the clutch out slipping.
THat would be nice....but get some DRs, or you'll spin like a bottle at a frat party.
03-26-2008, 02:30 PM
#74
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHile we're at it, we'll say a Skittle is faster than an Fbod too. That'll make you happy.
03-26-2008, 02:32 PM
#76
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Calm down oh great one! LOL I know what I'm doing at the track. I just was trying it easy the first run. Her car has the stock paper filter, snorkle, blah blah and it runs out of steam up top. Anything past 6,000rpms is like BUHHHHHHHHHH. I've got some mods ready for it I just want to get this car deep into the 12's with 3 bolt ons to throw in the Blue blood hater's faces.
03-26-2008, 02:36 PM
#78
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-26-2008, 02:36 PM
#79
Her car hasn't been on the dyno. I'm not worried about it. The stock intake combined with the Mach 1 torque cams seems to me to be the answer to why it falls off above 6,000rpms. It is an awsome car though, I'd love to own one myself but I just have too many toys as it is.
My next toy will be a full on Fox body coupe car drag car.
03-26-2008, 02:39 PM
#80
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know you were.
Her car hasn't been on the dyno. I'm not worried about it. The stock intake combined with the Mach 1 torque cams seems to me to be the answer to why it falls off above 6,000rpms. It is an awsome car though, I'd love to own one myself but I just have too many toys as it is. My next toy will be a full on Fox body coupe car drag car.
Her car hasn't been on the dyno. I'm not worried about it. The stock intake combined with the Mach 1 torque cams seems to me to be the answer to why it falls off above 6,000rpms. It is an awsome car though, I'd love to own one myself but I just have too many toys as it is.
My next toy will be a full on Fox body coupe car drag car.She has midpipe, catback, and no tune......well....that's probably part of it. Strap it and tune that biotch.