Took my aggression out on an SI
#81
Hint:
4 million is a lower number than 2% of the cars/trucks in the world. So you're attempt at proving me wrong was all kinds of retarded.
And I live in sonoma wine country.
#83
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well i dont think you get it mr jack know one gives a flying **** about you and your shity cars on this site.there just shitty cause you own them.and if you even do own them where are the slips? where are some ****** videos dumb ****?, and where are you located im sure there more than just me and a couple of other dudes on here that would love to ****** somke your ***.
#84
well i dont think you get it mr jack know one gives a flying **** about you and your shity cars on this site.there just shitty cause you own them.and if you even do own them where are the slips? where are some ****** videos dumb ****?, and where are you located im sure there more than just me and a couple of other dudes on here that would love to ****** somke your ***.
I'm sorry, I don't speak retard.
#87
So let's hang on for a sec here, I'm a little confused.
YOU are calling ME a "stupid ****"?
Just what the hell is going on here? Son, go sit in the retard chair. You are too goddamn stupid to be in the same room as me. Go on, git. Git!
GIT!
#89
Originally Posted by 180ls1
4 million cars and trucks that would beat him haha. If an low 11 second/ high10 second car is not at the top of the food chain then what is? I bet less then 2% of the cars in the world would take his car in the 1/4, that is not the top of the food chain?
#90
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
My god, you aren't the sharpest knife are you? The clear implication of your first sentence is that there are not 4 million cars/trucks in the world that would beat his car. Then you proceed to say you bet less than 2% of the cars would beat his in the 1/4 mile. The result of your phrasing is that the 4 million number I quoted is greater than 2%, when in fact it is much less than 2%. So you proved me "wrong" by proving my point. You stupid ************. Please just stop now, you aren't in my league. Go try someone else, little boy. I'm superior to you in every way.
#91
Think about what you're typing. I said there were 4 million cars and trucks (facetiously, btw) in the world that would beat his car. You attempt to prove me wrong by saying that you bet "less than 2% of cars will outrun his."
Now, you must realize that by making that statement, you are implying that 2% of all cars in the world would be a LOWER number than 4 million. You still follow?
The problem with your argument is that 4 million is approximately .4% of the cars in the world.
So, I effectively made the statement that .4% of the cars in the world would beat his car, and you rebute that by stating that "less than 2% of the cars in the world would beat his."
You do realize that .4% is less than 2%?
You proved me wrong by reiterating my point? Way to go smart guy...
And you call me dense? Pay attention, junior.
#94
Ask me how I can afford the stuff I have. When I answer, think about the inherent violence of my chosen profession. Then ask me if I'm scared of some half retarded ****** fatass redneck e-thug.
Here's a clue; it's the offseason.
#96
#97
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
What?
Think about what you're typing. I said there were 4 million cars and trucks (facetiously, btw) in the world that would beat his car. You attempt to prove me wrong by saying that you bet "less than 2% of cars will outrun his."
Now, you must realize that by making that statement, you are implying that 2% of all cars in the world would be a LOWER number than 4 million. You still follow?
The problem with your argument is that 4 million is approximately .4% of the cars in the world.
So, I effectively made the statement that .4% of the cars in the world would beat his car, and you rebute that by stating that "less than 2% of the cars in the world would beat his."
You do realize that .4% is less than 2%?
You proved me wrong by reiterating my point? Way to go smart guy...
And you call me dense? Pay attention, junior.
Think about what you're typing. I said there were 4 million cars and trucks (facetiously, btw) in the world that would beat his car. You attempt to prove me wrong by saying that you bet "less than 2% of cars will outrun his."
Now, you must realize that by making that statement, you are implying that 2% of all cars in the world would be a LOWER number than 4 million. You still follow?
The problem with your argument is that 4 million is approximately .4% of the cars in the world.
So, I effectively made the statement that .4% of the cars in the world would beat his car, and you rebute that by stating that "less than 2% of the cars in the world would beat his."
You do realize that .4% is less than 2%?
You proved me wrong by reiterating my point? Way to go smart guy...
And you call me dense? Pay attention, junior.
#100
As I suspected. You fucked up and don't want to admit it. It's ok, spout your cliches of the beaten and run along now.