Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Turbo RSX-S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2008, 12:26 AM
  #41  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by miamifan3413
S2000's have a 2.2l now I saw a rsx s make +30hp with just an intake? I think it was called a fujita intake?? Anyway's it had Hondata 4 tuning with headers and some other stuff i'm not familier with. It was pretty fast for a 4 banger. I was impressed.
Yep... which is why I specified for the 2.0 S2000 . And yes, a Hondata tune and a cold air intake is a must for the RSX-S, because they respond VERY well. Intake/tune is *capable* of 13s with an otherwise-stock car.
Old 04-23-2008, 04:23 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
ONEBADASSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Yep... which is why I specified for the 2.0 S2000 . And yes, a Hondata tune and a cold air intake is a must for the RSX-S, because they respond VERY well. Intake/tune is *capable* of 13s with an otherwise-stock car.
Thats funny, because one of my friends was reading an import tuner mag the other day, and they were doing bolt on dyno tests with the 07+ Civic Si. I believe they did intake, header, exhaust. When all was said and done, the car still had under 200WHP. I'll see if I can find the article online.
Old 04-23-2008, 04:28 PM
  #43  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Can't explain that... I saw with my own two eyes an '02 RSX-S put down 207whp with intake/header/exhaust and a Hondata tune. And one with the same mods + Nology Hot Wires put down 211whp. The 207whp car ran 13.7 @ 103mph.
Old 04-23-2008, 05:39 PM
  #44  
TECH Resident
 
CraZee ZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just for reference my close friend 03 rsx type s. T3/t4 turbo kit 9lbs since 15k miles now has 60k miles 5 years later. STILL STOCK MOTOR. Its crazy. He is doing a build now but Im impressed the motor took a good beating making around 320whp its whole life. catless 3 inch exhaust.
Old 04-23-2008, 05:41 PM
  #45  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CraZee ZO6
just for reference my close friend 03 rsx type s. T3/t4 turbo kit 9lbs since 15k miles now has 60k miles 5 years later. STILL STOCK MOTOR. Its crazy. He is doing a build now but Im impressed the motor took a good beating making around 320whp its whole life. catless 3 inch exhaust.
See, that's more realistic... if he was running 15psi he'd be making some SERIOUS power, but couldn't do it on stock internals. So like I said in the first place, the guy was probably running quite a bit less than 15psi. Considering the results of this race, probably more like 5-6psi.
Old 04-23-2008, 06:54 PM
  #46  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ta_06374's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It doesnt matter if he was running 5psi or 25psi he would of got owned either way from a dig.... FWD=FAIL!
Old 04-23-2008, 08:21 PM
  #47  
TECH Apprentice
 
Super28Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CraZee ZO6
just for reference my close friend 03 rsx type s. T3/t4 turbo kit 9lbs since 15k miles now has 60k miles 5 years later. STILL STOCK MOTOR. Its crazy. He is doing a build now but Im impressed the motor took a good beating making around 320whp its whole life. catless 3 inch exhaust.
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
See, that's more realistic... if he was running 15psi he'd be making some SERIOUS power, but couldn't do it on stock internals. So like I said in the first place, the guy was probably running quite a bit less than 15psi. Considering the results of this race, probably more like 5-6psi.
And this is relavent to anything how???? Who gives a **** about turbo RSX motors when youre comparing what a far inferior car can be made close to as fast as a stock LS1.

Please.
Old 04-23-2008, 08:23 PM
  #48  
TECH Resident
 
CraZee ZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Super28Sport
And this is relavent to anything how???? Who gives a **** about turbo RSX motors when youre comparing what a far inferior car can be made close to as fast as a stock LS1.

Please.
sure its inferior but its amuses me what other setups make and how.
im sure my boys turbo rsx would whoop you too.. i find that amusing.


Old 04-23-2008, 08:25 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
 
Super28Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by miamifan3413
S2000's have a 2.2l now My friend has one with a turbo and bolt on's and puts around 400whp/280wtq and it's damn fast. .
Hmm at least 5K just to get to 400. High five.

Originally Posted by miamifan3413
I love v8's but these 4 bangers produce some stout numbers for what they are. It just cost 4 times as much $$$ to make them fast
Yea. That ****** sucks. Not to mention how wack they are in the first place.
Old 04-23-2008, 08:29 PM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
 
Super28Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CraZee ZO6
sure its inferior but its amuses me what other setups make and how.
im sure my boys turbo rsx would whoop you too.. i find that amusing.


What exactly amuses you? What kind of "power" stock block turbo 4cylinders can make? Explain...
Old 04-24-2008, 02:21 AM
  #51  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Super28Sport
And this is relavent to anything how???? Who gives a **** about turbo RSX motors when youre comparing what a far inferior car can be made close to as fast as a stock LS1.

Please.
Wtf do you mean how is it relevant? If that guy is making 320whp on 9psi, what do you think one would make ACTUALLY running 15psi? We're talking 400whp+. Like, WAY more than 400whp. So it's relevant because it backs up what I said in the first place.

And for the record, a 400rwhp S2000 would be a FAST little biotch. ~400lbs less than an F-body, and 4.40 gears... and if you replace the softtop with a hardtop, that's another 150lbs gone. But I digress.
Old 04-24-2008, 03:05 AM
  #52  
On The Tree
 
gregsss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ada, Ok
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Skeet Skeet
it doesnt matter the guy still beat him. nice kill OP
^^^^^^^ i agree nice kill op
Old 04-24-2008, 04:22 AM
  #53  
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
ta_06374's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LivingCanvas
He beat a bunch of slow cars. Big whoop


Since when did 03 Cobra's get labeled as "slow"?
Old 04-24-2008, 09:52 AM
  #54  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Wtf do you mean how is it relevant? If that guy is making 320whp on 9psi, what do you think one would make ACTUALLY running 15psi? We're talking 400whp+. Like, WAY more than 400whp. So it's relevant because it backs up what I said in the first place.

And for the record, a 400rwhp S2000 would be a FAST little biotch. ~400lbs less than an F-body, and 4.40 gears... and if you replace the softtop with a hardtop, that's another 150lbs gone. But I digress.
WHO CARES WHAT YOU SAID IN THE FIRST PLACE. Do you not understand that no one cares to be "informed"? How many ******* times do people have to tell you to STFU before you finally get it? GO POUND SAND WITH YOUR FACE! Jesus christ dude, I'm sick of listening to your bullshit excuses, generalizations and all around annoying babble.

THE ******* RSX LOST, PERIOD. IT WASN'T FAST ENOUGH IN THIS RACE RUNNING 1,2,5,15,100 PSI, PERIOD! NO ONE CARES.

Old 04-24-2008, 01:20 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
ONEBADASSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
WHO CARES WHAT YOU SAID IN THE FIRST PLACE. Do you not understand that no one cares to be "informed"? How many ******* times do people have to tell you to STFU before you finally get it? GO POUND SAND WITH YOUR FACE! Jesus christ dude, I'm sick of listening to your bullshit excuses, generalizations and all around annoying babble.

THE ******* RSX LOST, PERIOD. IT WASN'T FAST ENOUGH IN THIS RACE RUNNING 1,2,5,15,100 PSI, PERIOD! NO ONE CARES.

Thank you sir. Thank you. Finally someone besides myself has the ***** to say it.
Old 04-24-2008, 01:24 PM
  #56  
Banned
 
ONEBADASSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Wtf do you mean how is it relevant? If that guy is making 320whp on 9psi, what do you think one would make ACTUALLY running 15psi? We're talking 400whp+. Like, WAY more than 400whp. So it's relevant because it backs up what I said in the first place.

And for the record, a 400rwhp S2000 would be a FAST little biotch. ~400lbs less than an F-body, and 4.40 gears... and if you replace the softtop with a hardtop, that's another 150lbs gone. But I digress.
You need a reality check. First off, no RSX is going to make 400+WHP on 15PSI. I find it extremely hard to believe its making 320WHP at 9PSI, sounds like you're numbers are highly inflated.

Second of all a 400WHP S2000 would not be going ANYWHERE. Literally. The transmission, driveshaft, and your precious 4.40 gears and axles would be all over the road in pieces. Honda drivetrains are weak, it was never designed to hold more than 240HP, and they often have trouble holding even that much.
Old 04-24-2008, 01:48 PM
  #57  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
WHO CARES WHAT YOU SAID IN THE FIRST PLACE. Do you not understand that no one cares to be "informed"? How many ******* times do people have to tell you to STFU before you finally get it? GO POUND SAND WITH YOUR FACE! Jesus christ dude, I'm sick of listening to your bullshit excuses, generalizations and all around annoying babble.

THE ******* RSX LOST, PERIOD. IT WASN'T FAST ENOUGH IN THIS RACE RUNNING 1,2,5,15,100 PSI, PERIOD! NO ONE CARES.

You can always block me if you want... some people on this site actually LIKE to learn about different cars other than the ones they own. If you're not one of them, so be it. You can stay in your little "my car is the fastest and best car in the world" little fog if you'd like.
Old 04-24-2008, 01:50 PM
  #58  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ONEBADASSWS6
You need a reality check. First off, no RSX is going to make 400+WHP on 15PSI. I find it extremely hard to believe its making 320WHP at 9PSI, sounds like you're numbers are highly inflated.

Second of all a 400WHP S2000 would not be going ANYWHERE. Literally. The transmission, driveshaft, and your precious 4.40 gears and axles would be all over the road in pieces. Honda drivetrains are weak, it was never designed to hold more than 240HP, and they often have trouble holding even that much.
Would you care to back up those statements? First off, the 320whp @ 9psi aren't my numbers. They were presented by another member here. They are typical of what I've seen, but they still aren't "my numbers." Second, a 400rwhp S2000 would last as long as the owner wanted it to. Since the power comes on so high in the rpm band, it's not like there would be a 400rwhp shock from a roll. Now if you're at the track with drag radials it might be an issue, but the same could be said (and often is) about F-bodies. And like I said, mine's been going strong for 72k miles.
Old 04-24-2008, 01:55 PM
  #59  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
SonofaBish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok enough whining - you wanna know how much horsepower it will make... here's a general formula that usually hits it pretty good... its, of course, going to be plus or minus a few hp (depending on setup/efficiency/etc), but who cares...
HP = HP + HP(psi/14.7) = HP (1 + (psi/14.7))

so, a rsx-r makes what? 200hp stock? 200(1+(15/14.7)) = 404 ... 404*.85 (assuming avg drivetrain loss) = 343whp....

since when is 343whp
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
WAY more than 400whp
Old 04-24-2008, 02:02 PM
  #60  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's a "general" rule, but I've seen 170hp B18C1s make 300whp on 9psi... it all depends. A bolt-on/tuned RSX-S is ~210hp at the WHEELS, and I don't know any turbo RSXs that don't have atleast full bolt-ons. And a tune is more than necessary. The "WAY more than 400whp" might have been a bit of an exaggeration, but it's still gonna be a very stout car.


Quick Reply: Turbo RSX-S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.