99 TA vs Mach 1
05-02-2008, 12:49 AM
#281
which is your turbo car
05-02-2008, 07:07 AM
#287
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pittsburgh .... wanna meet half way? LOL 
well come on tough guy.... if you think you're so fast, do share.... this will be the beginning of a thread just like the thread with ls1wannabe.... talked so much about how fast his car was, and how he's got this guy covered and then this guy covered...... then everyone finds out its a 12 second car...
Last edited by SonofaBish; 05-02-2008 at 07:16 AM.
05-02-2008, 09:00 AM
#289
I admit i dont have one now, i sold my 87 supra, dynoed 517rwhp, went an 11.19 on 93 octane with IRS still. My T/A made 357rwhp, went 12.78 @110 before the tune when it made 336rwhp, so i was thinking i could have gone 12.6s with the tune. I will admit alot of the cars on that list were faster than mine, but yes i did have fast cars, i sold them for reasons, now im gettign another f-body
05-02-2008, 10:46 AM
#293
Well both of my cars eat F-bodies and Corvettes. One runs low 12's and the other SHOULD run low 10's high 9's next couple times at the track. It has run 10's on the stock motor. The new motor will have quite a bit more power.Oh and the car in my sig (low 12 second car) hasn't been run this year. It ran 12.1 with a slipping clutch. This year I have a built 6 speed and a Spec stage 3 clutch. It should run alittle faster!
05-02-2008, 10:57 AM
#295
11 Second Club
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well both of my cars eat F-bodies and Corvettes. One runs low 12's and the other SHOULD run low 10's high 9's next couple times at the track. It has run 10's on the stock motor. The new motor will have quite a bit more power.Oh and the car in my sig (low 12 second car) hasn't been run this year. It ran 12.1 with a slipping clutch. This year I have a built 6 speed and a Spec stage 3 clutch. It should run alittle faster!
My buddy (mustang guy) just went to Iraq so when he comes back he'll have a shitload of money to **** with his cars. He owns a 97 GT and a 5.0 non-fox body type mustang, as well as a 99 V-6 (taking space in my ******* driveway). They're not bad looking cars, just slow.
He says he's going forced induction with he 5.0.
05-02-2008, 10:59 AM
#297
Post some pics of both rides man.
My buddy (mustang guy) just went to Iraq so when he comes back he'll have a shitload of money to **** with his cars. He owns a 97 GT and a 5.0 non-fox body type mustang, as well as a 99 V-6. They're not bad looking cars, just slow.
He says he's going forced induction with he 5.0.
My buddy (mustang guy) just went to Iraq so when he comes back he'll have a shitload of money to **** with his cars. He owns a 97 GT and a 5.0 non-fox body type mustang, as well as a 99 V-6. They're not bad looking cars, just slow.
He says he's going forced induction with he 5.0.
05-02-2008, 11:02 AM
#298
So is the 99 forced induction? I have a hard time thinking a 99 with 320rwhp if it has bolt ons is running 10s, 11s is you have a built drivetrain and suspsension and run slicks but 10s?
