Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

65 mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #21  
dannyz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 76
From: olympia, wash
Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
How did I prove your point?

First off, it wasn't a 'special order', nor was it available from one particular factory. Those statements alone prove you know nothing about 289s.
Secondly, that was REARWHEEL POWER, not ENGINE power.....so please tell me how that 289 cranked out 280/312.
Thirdly, Yes, you did read that wrong.

THe Hipo 289 STOCK was 271 HP. That motor had ALOT left in her. THey didn't even touch teh heads, which are the MOST restrictive part of that motor. 40 HP is gained from a good P/P job on those heads. That motor FROM THE FACTORY pushed 8k rpm's like it was nothing. THat is the EXACT same motor used in teh SHelby Cobra's and the Ford GT40s. Please tell me how those cars didn't do anything.......go ahead GENIUS.....let's hear it.
Under the "notes" part of the write up, it says the engine was a special order.
And yes, I realize that the hp was to the wheel's, [ Net hp].
I don't care what kind of vehicle they put that engine into.
Yes, you can get a decent 1/4 mile out of it if the car is light enough, so what?
280 hp is weak, and your tryning to argue otherwise is pointless.
Yes, you can do the heads, raise the comp. and so on.
I am not impressed.
If you want a good street engine, start with something good out of the box.
Not a pathetic 289.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 02:19 PM
  #22  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

That's like saying the DZ302 was weak. It was only rated at 290hp. But both the Hi-Po 289s and the DZ302 were amazing motors that did what they were designed to do quite well.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #23  
dannyz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 76
From: olympia, wash
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
That's like saying the DZ302 was weak. It was only rated at 290hp. But both the Hi-Po 289s and the DZ302 were amazing motors that did what they were designed to do quite well.
Yes, they did what they were designed to do.
A lawnmower engine does what it was designed to do as well.
At the time of it's development, the 289 was a peppy little motor that was not all that bad, and could hold it's own.
But in todays world it is far outclassed, and thats what was demonstrated in the op's first post.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #24  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Cars are better today than they used to be... that's not a secret. But just because something built today can beat something built yesterday, does not mean what was built yesterday is "weak."
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #25  
dannyz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 76
From: olympia, wash
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Cars are better today than they used to be... that's not a secret. But just because something built today can beat something built yesterday, does not mean what was built yesterday is "weak."
Maybe I was over the top on my responses.
The 289 ford had it's day, and was considered a very stout engine for its displacement.
And it was very popular for basic mods as it did respond well to all of the bolt-on's.
It was pretty common back in the early '70's to see them at SIR, [ now called pacific raceway's] running low 14's to high 13's all day long.
Back then that was pretty good for a street car.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #26  
Tiny161092's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Oxford,AL
Default

Lol ls1tech lord of the blowing everything out of proportion websites. lol
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #27  
ponygt65's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by PowershifterNC
danny looks like you pinched a nerve...calm down pony you seem to have a vast knowledge on the subject and yes 289's can be quick in the right hands
You're right....I do tend to get defensive. I just get a tad irritated when people dont' even try to learn about stuff. In some peoples minds (not a dig directly on dannyz) it is what it is and that's all there is too it. ALl the while, not truly knowing alot about what they are 'thinking'.

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Cars are better today than they used to be... that's not a secret. But just because something built today can beat something built yesterday, does not mean what was built yesterday is "weak."
+1

Originally Posted by dannyz
Maybe I was over the top on my responses.
The 289 ford had it's day, and was considered a very stout engine for its displacement.
And it was very popular for basic mods as it did respond well to all of the bolt-on's.
It was pretty common back in the early '70's to see them at SIR, [ now called pacific raceway's] running low 14's to high 13's all day long.
Back then that was pretty good for a street car.
you were over the top your post and I could have handled it a 'tad' (sarcasm) more mature than I did.

The hipo 289 is no slouch. Believe me. (oh, did I mention I had one for years).

I know no one will believe me, but in a street race, I beat an LT1 Z M6 by a fender. ANd I'll be the first to admit I shouldn't have...but he sucked at driving.....and my car was 98% original.

Originally Posted by Tiny161092
Lol ls1tech lord of the blowing everything out of proportion websites. lol
- true.....but that happens on ford sites as well.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM.