Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

IRS convertion in LS1 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2009, 07:30 PM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (19)
 
THENASCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

an IRS was never meant for an fbody. if u want IRS get GTO
Old 04-10-2009, 08:59 PM
  #22  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lol...I wouldnt get a GTO. Ide get a Vette.
Old 04-11-2009, 02:15 AM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
v7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Strano offers a setup that is well adjusted to most peoples needs/wants. you might consider trying out one of his shock/spring/swaybar combos before trying out any other solutions.

unbalanced engineering offers a lowered panhard rod set up that will improve the predictability of the rear significantly. to run it at it's lower settings you need to upgrade shocks and springs as well. in the end this ends up being a bit more of a track direction. I DD the car for a few years in TX before retiring it to joyride status when I moved to the NYC area... your local roads make a huge difference in what is acceptable.

An IRS conversion is very involved and may be unnecessary for your needs.
Old 04-11-2009, 10:24 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
 
DanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Step 1: sell fbody
Step 2: buy corvette
Step 3: Enjoy all the money, hours, and agrivation saved
Old 04-11-2009, 10:38 AM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (54)
 
bluebird71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanO
Step 1: sell fbody
Step 2: buy corvette
Step 3: Enjoy all the money, hours, and agrivation saved
Good advice I must admit, but why not keep the f-body as well for a future drag car. I love the way my f-body handles, don't get me wrong, but I'm pretty sure no matter how much $ I throw into its suspension, it still probably won't hang corners as well as a well set up C6 Vette. Sam Strano would probably disagree with that statement though, just look at what he has done with his moderately-powered Z-28.
Old 04-11-2009, 01:35 PM
  #26  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanO
Step 1: sell fbody
Step 2: buy corvette
Step 3: Enjoy all the money, hours, and agrivation saved
Well thats another thing I was considering. But my Camaro is paid off and ide have to get a loan in order to sell my car (if anyone was buying) and then buy a Vette. Plus the C5 has a nicer interior IMO, but the C6 body is far superior.
Old 04-15-2009, 03:31 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Call for Jay at Zues Motorsports. He has done one on his own F-Body and it looks/drives great. I want to say he was trying to put a kit together for it but I'm not 100% sure on that.
Old 04-15-2009, 03:33 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heres a picture of it.

Old 04-16-2009, 06:12 PM
  #29  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea ive seen that one before. Its an LT1 correct? My real reason for asking about IRS is because i just really want to get my Camaro to handle. The things i have now arent cutting it, but it has been brought to my attention that somethings such as the huge rear swaybar have been detrimental to its handling.
Old 04-16-2009, 06:16 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (54)
 
bluebird71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Strano's swaybars are hollow so while they are bigger, they are also lighter.
Old 04-16-2009, 07:56 PM
  #31  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Do you do any type of autocross? Just trying to get a feel for why you need the car to handle better than it does? Are you taking the curves off the freeway at 100 MPH? What are the handling problems that you are having?
Old 04-20-2009, 03:18 PM
  #32  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont do autoxing. All of my friends have great handling cars and Im just tired of being the stereotypical muscle car that only goes in straight lines. If i got my car to handle well, then i would be the best of BOTH worlds, and therefore...THE MASTER.
Old 04-21-2009, 08:19 AM
  #33  
TECH Regular
 
Awake455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlaanndoooo
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black02LS1
I have done just about everything possible to my suspention and chassis except struts. Yes it does handle a lot better now, but its still not where i want it to be. I know my next upgrade is going to be tires, I have some fairly cheap tires on there now and ive heard only good things about splurging on good tires.

But ive never heard of that Watt's link? Anyone have anymore info on it?
Seems to me that you really really need to do those two things first. You may still want to go to an IRS eventually but you haven't done two of the most important things. They make a night to day, absolute zero to boiling lava difference if everything else is stable and matched.

I mean, even if you do go IRS you are still going to need good tires all around and good shocks up front. An IRS out back with crappy tires and DeCarbon shocks up front is still going to handle horrible.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:45 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
 
FiredUpZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elgin, Il
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Black02LS1
I dont do autoxing. All of my friends have great handling cars and Im just tired of being the stereotypical muscle car that only goes in straight lines. If i got my car to handle well, then i would be the best of BOTH worlds, and therefore...THE MASTER.
Well said.
Old 04-21-2009, 03:46 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
 
FiredUpZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elgin, Il
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Black02LS1
I dont do autoxing. All of my friends have great handling cars and Im just tired of being the stereotypical muscle car that only goes in straight lines. If i got my car to handle well, then i would be the best of BOTH worlds, and therefore...THE MASTER.
Well said. Although these cars can handle extremely well with the live rear axle.
Old 04-21-2009, 08:48 PM
  #36  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea Ive changed my mind from the title. Ive learned a lot since i started it. Right now I have cheap tires and the factory struts with 74k miles. From what im learning, now all of the suspention work ive done has been benificial, such as my large rear sway bar.
Old 05-20-2009, 08:30 AM
  #37  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
van454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why is it that anytime someone asks about fitting IRS all they get is "stick with the beam, it's better for drag racing" or "buy a 'vette/GTO" I know that the standard setup is pretty good and it's a lot of hassle to fit IRS, but IRS IS better for road use, don't you guys modify your cars? I have an 88 GTA that I am planning a LSx for, should I just buy something that already has an LSx in it? I have been trying to research the C4 IRS swap, and these are the main responses that I see, how about we point out that it is a hard swap, then start talking about how we could go about it and what the main hurdles are, rather than just saying it's bad idea. That zues swap is very nice, there was some more pics of that one here somewhere. As for third-gen swaps, I haven't been able to find pics of one yet, but as someone said earlier it would be the same as forth-gen anyway. What are the track widths of C4 rear ends, I read somewhere that there are 2 different ones, the early ones are narrower I think
Old 05-20-2009, 10:49 AM
  #38  
TECH Regular
 
Awake455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlaanndoooo
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, any thread like this is going to get the people that suggest just going with their solution. It is also going to get the suggestions, as it sounds like the op is pondering, to make sure everything is upgraded and matched as an interim step.

The ultimate test and final answer to an IRS vs a finely tuned solid axle 4th gen F body setup has not to my knowledge been shown. That would be having a known skilled & talented driver with a properly set up solid axle car at a road course with a pair of similarly set up F bodies, 1 with a solid axle setup and 1 with an IRS. Maybe a day of testing and tweaking for each to make sure the driver is confident in both. Then, on a different day, do 1 heat with each car.

Would be nice to have an unlimited budget to do such things.

Until this is done I can't help but pay attention to how well even the hpde guys are doing with a properly tuned solid axle.


Now on the C4 setups...all I really remember is the width of the ZR1 is greater. Don't know if that was in wider wheels with different backspacing or suspension. Another reason I try to avoid thoughts like a 4th gen F body IRS is I would be wanting to go full-bore insane and try a C5 or C6 torque tube/transmission/axle setup.
Old 05-20-2009, 02:00 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
Received 199 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by van454
Why is it that anytime someone asks about fitting IRS all they get is "stick with the beam, it's better for drag racing" or "buy a 'vette/GTO" I know that the standard setup is pretty good and it's a lot of hassle to fit IRS, but IRS IS better for road use, don't you guys modify your cars? I have an 88 GTA that I am planning a LSx for, should I just buy something that already has an LSx in it? I have been trying to research the C4 IRS swap, and these are the main responses that I see, how about we point out that it is a hard swap, then start talking about how we could go about it and what the main hurdles are, rather than just saying it's bad idea. That zues swap is very nice, there was some more pics of that one here somewhere. As for third-gen swaps, I haven't been able to find pics of one yet, but as someone said earlier it would be the same as forth-gen anyway. What are the track widths of C4 rear ends, I read somewhere that there are 2 different ones, the early ones are narrower I think
This third gen has a Twin Turbo 305 and a C4 IRS, its owned by a guy named Jeremy in Illinois. I can see if I can get more pics and info.


Last edited by lees02WS6; 03-19-2011 at 08:45 AM.
Old 05-20-2009, 02:45 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
lees02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
Received 199 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Not surprisingly, the upgrade looks like the 4th gen formy, except the exhaust isn't quite as cool. Not sure this is the same third gen, but it has been done several times on third gens.




]

Last edited by lees02WS6; 03-19-2011 at 08:46 AM.


Quick Reply: IRS convertion in LS1 Camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.