Removing Upper PHB
#1
Removing Upper PHB
If you have an Adj. PHB is the Upper PHB still needed? Mine is really close to my exhaust.
Also, I've read that it isn't a good idea to run a PHB relocation on a lowered car.
Thanks for your answers and pardon my newb question
I tried searching but once again the new search feature has failed me
Also, I've read that it isn't a good idea to run a PHB relocation on a lowered car.
Thanks for your answers and pardon my newb question
I tried searching but once again the new search feature has failed me
#7
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
Hello,
The panhard bar relocation kit will work on a lowered car but will sit closer to the PHB. You shouldn't have any issues. Here is a link to our set-up... if you have any additional questions please ask.
www.umiperformance.com/2024
Thank you!
Ryan
The panhard bar relocation kit will work on a lowered car but will sit closer to the PHB. You shouldn't have any issues. Here is a link to our set-up... if you have any additional questions please ask.
www.umiperformance.com/2024
Thank you!
Ryan
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Resident
This just came up really recently in another thread, and many before but the search is basically non-existent at the moment or else I'd hook ya up with a few links. Anyway, the Upper panhard bar is there to take pressure off of the thin sheet metal bracket the panhard bar bolts to. Without it the bracket will bend and flex, causing the bracket to warp and possibly even get torn off in time. Think of it this way too. GM had to create tooling for that part and use up the materials to put one of those on every f-body made. If the car ddn't need it don't you think they would have left it off? I mean no offense to anybody because I love GM, but this IS GM we're talking about. They're famous for cutting costs where they can.
Last edited by nighthawk15; 03-18-2009 at 08:23 AM.
#12
11 Second Club
iTrader: (36)
This just came up really recently in another thread, and many before but the search is basically non-existent at the moment or else I'd hook ya up with a few links. Anyway, the Upper panhard bar is there to take pressure off of the thin sheet metal bracket the panhard bar bolts to. Without it the bracket will bend and flex, causing the bracket to warp and possibly even get torn off in time. Think of it this way too. GM had to create tooling for that part and use up the materials to put one of those on every f-body made. If the car ddn't need it don't you think they would have left it off? I mean no offense to anybody because I love GM, but this IS GM we're talking about. They're famous for cutting costs where they can.
#13
Interesting views...I guess I will leave it on for the time being. I'll look more into UMI's relocation kit since I already have their Adj. LCAs and PHB and relocation brackets....
I too wish the search feature was up to par as I like researching issues such as this....
I too wish the search feature was up to par as I like researching issues such as this....
#14
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know what your saying, but GM has proven to do things on these cars that is extremely unnecessary.. take the coolant line running through the TB for instance. They spent their time make and developing this, but everyone agrees its just plain unnecessary...TB bypass Free mod. This is the same thing, just because it is there, doesn't mean it needs to be. You should ask some of the hardcore weight reduction guys about this concept lol.
#15
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
The PHB brace is necessary for strength. Do not take it off. I'm not a fan of the PHB relocation kits though I do sell UMI's for those that need it. And here's why I don't love those thing. Using them puts the PHB on an angle and PHB's work best level. The more away from level you go, the more jacking and arc effects you get. Yes, you gain room for exhaust, but frankly I think fitting duals is less important than having the suspension work right.
The UMI part is very nice quality, it's just geared toward a different crowd.
The UMI part is very nice quality, it's just geared toward a different crowd.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#17
11 Second Club
iTrader: (36)
TB coolant "can" come in handy up north, not so much down here though. This is not one of the cases you are talking about though. That upper bar is absolutely needed for cars that do more than go in a straight line. The force being placed on that part is rather high. I'm sure you could come up with something else to brace it, but why would you bother? It would take some weight out, but how much by the time you finish reinforcing it? If you really want to get rid of it you could always put a watts linkage back there but that adds weight. So basically I'm saying leave it alone.
#18
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
While GM isn't the smartest company with money, they aren't stupid and would not go through the trouble, time and cost of designing useless parts. Move over, the setup was designed around 1980 when tires were a whole lot less sticky than they are now, so I submit it's even more important than ever.
Further, don't you find it odd that while you want a stiffer PHB some think it's ok to take away a support that the PHB and the associated loads dump into?
I do.
Further, don't you find it odd that while you want a stiffer PHB some think it's ok to take away a support that the PHB and the associated loads dump into?
I do.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#19
The PHB brace is necessary for strength. Do not take it off. I'm not a fan of the PHB relocation kits though I do sell UMI's for those that need it. And here's why I don't love those thing. Using them puts the PHB on an angle and PHB's work best level. The more away from level you go, the more jacking and arc effects you get. Yes, you gain room for exhaust, but frankly I think fitting duals is less important than having the suspension work right.
The UMI part is very nice quality, it's just geared toward a different crowd.
The UMI part is very nice quality, it's just geared toward a different crowd.
#20
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not saying it is or isn't needed, only that you can't say just because GM put it there that the car obviously needs it. I also was told that unless your car is in the arctic the TB would never reach a temperature cold enough to freeze shut needing the coolant to warm it up.. but again I don't know these things for certain only internet hearsay.. take the information and make a decision for yourself.