C6 Z06 brakes in rear?
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On an interesting side note, If you think the appearance of small brake rotor diameters within the large rims look unappealing, just have a look at vehicles with the most optimal aerodynamic properties out there and you'll see they can be quite shocking to the eyes.
#22
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're actually worried about performance and not looks, you need to be looking less at ANY BBK and look more at what really goes on with regards to the statics and dynamics of the vehicle. The majority of people I've encountered on this forum wanting or already have BBK's truly don't know what they're working with in the first place. I know, because I fell into that trap several years ago, and so did my friend who bought my last F-body from me (who still let's me drive it when I'm in the states).
Deep braking or not, it's still wise to achieve the best brake bias as possible. Read through the formulas that I directed to you and see why that even though a CTS-V/C6 Z06 front combo is really way too front biased.
Unfortunately the fancy and many times false representation of marketing has drowned out the understanding of the real world phenomena of physics. When I truly discovered why my several BBK's didn't actually improve braking performance the way I thought, I decided to get back into Engineering and really learn what's going on.
On an interesting side note, If you think the appearance of small brake rotor diameters within the large rims look unappealing, just have a look at vehicles with the most optimal aerodynamic properties out there and you'll see they can be quite shocking to the eyes.
Deep braking or not, it's still wise to achieve the best brake bias as possible. Read through the formulas that I directed to you and see why that even though a CTS-V/C6 Z06 front combo is really way too front biased.
Unfortunately the fancy and many times false representation of marketing has drowned out the understanding of the real world phenomena of physics. When I truly discovered why my several BBK's didn't actually improve braking performance the way I thought, I decided to get back into Engineering and really learn what's going on.
On an interesting side note, If you think the appearance of small brake rotor diameters within the large rims look unappealing, just have a look at vehicles with the most optimal aerodynamic properties out there and you'll see they can be quite shocking to the eyes.
http://img.motorpasion.com/galleries..._hermes-05.jpg
I want to read through all that information but I'm thinking its going to be way over my head and out of my grasp for understanding... I can't see why someone can't just give a straight answer and say...
ideally with our fbodies and there factory weight ratio the ideal brake upgrade is "x"
Maybe this is easier... what are you running for brakes? I'm not questioning you by the way I'm sure you know what you're talking about... atleast a hell of a lot better then I do... I'm just looking for the "dumb down" answer.
#23
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...I want to read through all that information but I'm thinking its going to be way over my head and out of my grasp for understanding... I can't see why someone can't just give a straight answer and say...
ideally with our fbodies and there factory weight ratio the ideal brake upgrade is "x"
ideally with our fbodies and there factory weight ratio the ideal brake upgrade is "x"
AFA that "technical information" goes, if anyone knows basic algebra, differentiation and summation, then the only problem would be getting the data to plug into the equations. It's actually 3rd/4th year secondary school mathematics.
EDIT: AFA Tyres go, for the street, I've actually been comfortable with 275/40/17 NT-01's. The don't last as long as most of those "uber street tyres" that cost several thousands, but for myself and my buddy, they work really well and better than the "uber street tyres" at somewhat higher street temperatures.
AFA that bugatti veyron goes, it actually has a relatively high Cd believe it or not. Something more shocking could be this: http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/Default.aspx
Last edited by Foxxtron; 03-19-2010 at 11:24 PM.
#24
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
thread revival.......ill put my thoughts in and hopefully some people will listen who still want to upgrade rear brakes. take a look at all the f-bodies that professionally race.....CMC, AI, autox, solo 1/2, etc. nearly 100% of them have STOCK rear brakes, except for pads. STOCK rotors, STOCK calipers, STOCK brackets. the fronts, of course, are changed. only if you get an adjustable brake bias setup or a decoupled torque arm is it worth it to increase rear brake. if youve ever been on a track with good front pads, you would have seen the rear locks up and hops under hard braking. i use CHEAP, no-name pads in the rear, and i still have hop......which means there already is TOO MUCH rear brake. if i and nearly every single other person with the same setup has that problem, why would we want to increase rear brakes even more?
i have a set of brand new HPS rears.....never put them on, never will, for the reason i just explained.
i have a set of brand new HPS rears.....never put them on, never will, for the reason i just explained.
I know folks that cut have their pad away in the rear and still had issues. In fact my customers who autox have less brake hop issues than most because I think I best understand how the ABS/EBD and the rear suspension works and at times can conspire to screw you.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#26
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
Electronic Brake Distribution
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
#28
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
Standard... it's how the car brake biases. There is no standard type proportioning valve in LS1 cars, they use the ABS pump to do the proportioning.
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450
Results matter. Talk is cheap. We are miles beyond the success anyone else has had with the 4th gens, and C5, C6, C7 Corvettes,
10 SCCA Solo National Championships, 2008 Driver of they Year, 2012 Driver of Eminence
13 SCCA Pro Solo Nationals Championships
2023 UMI King of the Mountain Champion