4-Link rear suspension. Need a little help
#1
4-Link rear suspension. Need a little help
I知 thinking of putting in a 4-link setup on my 4th gen Camaro when I install my 8.8 rear. I知 going to be reusing the existing lower-control arm mounts on the car. Now I just need to figure out where to mount the upper control arms. I know the upper control arms need to be positioned at a 45 degree angle but the metal around or near the tunnel is pretty thin. I don稚 want to back-half the car or chop it all up. So before I start hacking and wacking the car, does anyone have any pictures of their 4-link suspension? No latter bar setups please. I知 looking for 4-link setups only.
I've looked at a few posts here but the only ones I've seen her back-halfed cars.
Thanks guys.
I've looked at a few posts here but the only ones I've seen her back-halfed cars.
Thanks guys.
#3
I was thinking of mounting the upper arms very similar to the way they are mounted in the pic. My only concern was there being to lil metal in that area and it not being strong enough. This car will be being 1.3 60ft times.
I want to do a triangulated 4 link. The lower arms will be parallel and the upper arms will be triangulated @ 45 degrees. This will eleminate the need for a panhard bar.
I want to do a triangulated 4 link. The lower arms will be parallel and the upper arms will be triangulated @ 45 degrees. This will eleminate the need for a panhard bar.
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
I can't help you there, not into drag racing. This is the build thread
https://ls1tech.com/forums/appearanc...ld-thread.html
Since the upper arms in both types of four links take up the torque reaction and braking forces there should be a good deal of similarity. The exception is that you are adding side loading forces as well.
I'd find out from him what else he did besides the plates he added, and what he's using the car for.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/appearanc...ld-thread.html
Since the upper arms in both types of four links take up the torque reaction and braking forces there should be a good deal of similarity. The exception is that you are adding side loading forces as well.
I'd find out from him what else he did besides the plates he added, and what he's using the car for.
#6
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
Im gonna jump in here on your thread in hopes we can both grab some good info. My platform is different, BUT we are both after the same thing and have the same issues.
My question is, is their an IDEAL length for the upper control arms if the bottom are parallel and the uppers are at a 45*??
EDIT: OP sorry, if this is inappropriate, ill be glad to start my own thread, as i have more questions concerning setup as well.
My question is, is their an IDEAL length for the upper control arms if the bottom are parallel and the uppers are at a 45*??
EDIT: OP sorry, if this is inappropriate, ill be glad to start my own thread, as i have more questions concerning setup as well.
#7
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
I was thinking of mounting the upper arms very similar to the way they are mounted in the pic. My only concern was there being to little metal in that area and it not being strong enough. This car will be being 1.3 60ft times.
I want to do a triangulated 4 link. The lower arms will be parallel and the upper arms will be triangulated @ 45 degrees. This will eleminate the need for a panhard bar.
I want to do a triangulated 4 link. The lower arms will be parallel and the upper arms will be triangulated @ 45 degrees. This will eleminate the need for a panhard bar.