Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

best SFCS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2013, 10:12 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
tony1784's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
I like my MWC connectors. Had UMI boxed weld in but never installed. After seeing how MWC fit and where the connect compare to other brands I just flat out agree with Eric at MWC the tie the car better than any others out there.
do you have pictures of them installed?
Old 04-04-2013, 10:41 AM
  #22  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
*02WS6TURK*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oregon Grown
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony1784
i was thinking about ordering these for the bang for the buck, seems cheap..
http://www.foundersperformance.com/1...ctors-weld-in/

and there is a 2 guys locally that will make and install for just under 200..

is it absolutly worth getting a 3 point style setup?
After running a few different style SFC, 3-Point's are the only way to go IMO. I've got the UMI bolt-on's.
Old 04-04-2013, 10:58 AM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,046
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tony1784
do you have pictures of them installed?
If I could figure how to post pics on my phone yes I would lol
Old 04-04-2013, 02:39 PM
  #24  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Our subframe connectors are very popular because they've been proven under some serious horsepower cars. However, at those levels, most guys have roll bars and cages, so it's hard to gauge how effective they are. It's our street guys that really give them the test because they rely solely on them to stiffen/strengthen their chassis. In those cases, customers always boast about the improved rigidity - which allows the suspension to do its job better and reduces flex on T-top cars. We only suggest weld-in on the fourth-gens because it's the best method to connect two pieces of metal, in our opinion.

- Kevin
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 04-04-2013, 02:48 PM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm not sure if you'd consider this a good test or not...

What if you bolted in a set of SFCs, drove on them for a year or two, and then removed and observed if the bolt holes widened themselves? Can you consider that proof that the chassis is flexing?
Old 04-04-2013, 02:56 PM
  #26  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
BMR Tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 4,173
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28bryan
I'm not sure if you'd consider this a good test or not...

What if you bolted in a set of SFCs, drove on them for a year or two, and then removed and observed if the bolt holes widened themselves? Can you consider that proof that the chassis is flexing?
We actually made some bolt-int SFCs and removed them to fix them to a jig for production and every bolt hole was elongated. So we scrapped that plan and have been pushing the "weld-on is the only way" mentality since. There are some applications where the stress point doesn't cause this, but on the 4th Gen it most certainly was the case for our design.
__________________
T.C.
Sales Pro
BMR Suspension
(813) 986-9302

Like us on Facebook!
Old 04-10-2013, 12:07 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
tony1784's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no offense to BMR, but i went ahead and ordered the founders performance ones..
http://www.foundersperformance.com/1...ctors-weld-in/

$134 shipped to my door. i plan on modifying them a little.. we'll see how the project turns out.
Old 05-14-2013, 08:33 AM
  #28  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
tony1784's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

got them installed last week, and i must say, the fitment is damn good.

only thing i dont like is they dont encapsulate the LCA mount.. these just weld to the outside panel, i think when i swap my motor, ill fab up a cap that will go over the entire control arm mount.
Old 05-14-2013, 08:49 AM
  #29  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (26)
 
ssvert99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,490
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Even if you did encapsulate the LCA mount you still didn't actually connect to the rear subframe. Look at the area around the LCA mount and you will see that the LCA mount(especially the outside edge) is nowhere near the rear frame rail. You accomplished stiffening the LCA bracket and adding 25 pounds to your car.
Old 05-14-2013, 09:28 AM
  #30  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
tony1784's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

although i agree with you, many many people for YEARS have been running the other style connectors without issue.

i personally dont think at most peoples lower power levels > 500hp, it would be an issue. even then when your faster than that.. it should have a cage.
Old 05-14-2013, 09:47 AM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tony1784
although i agree with you, many many people for YEARS have been running the other style connectors without issue.

i personally dont think at most peoples lower power levels > 500hp, it would be an issue. even then when your faster than that.. it should have a cage
Technically you can run without subframe connectors without issue. Having no issues doesn't mean you can't improve something though.
Old 05-14-2013, 11:21 AM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just so I am getting this straight,

Bolt in 2 point SFCs are absolutely worthless and do nothing?

Awesome, happy to see so many vendors still selling them, why?
Old 05-14-2013, 11:30 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I wouldn't say they do nothing at all, but they don't do as much as a full SFC that actually attaches to the rear subframe.

This is just my analysis of looking at how the underside of the car is put together and looking at what the various SFCs tie in to. I don't have any SFCs on my car yet, although eventually I do plan on getting some MWC SFCs. They just are not a high priority.
Old 05-14-2013, 12:46 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Raoul-Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
I wouldn't say they do nothing at all, but they don't do as much as a full SFC that actually attaches to the rear subframe.

This is just my analysis of looking at how the underside of the car is put together and looking at what the various SFCs tie in to. I don't have any SFCs on my car yet, although eventually I do plan on getting some MWC SFCs. They just are not a high priority.
The way everyones making them sound, I might as well just take them off back to stock.

Dang.
Old 05-14-2013, 01:07 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Raoul-Duke
The way everyones making them sound, I might as well just take them off back to stock.

Dang.
You benefit something but not near as much as 3points.



Quick Reply: best SFCS?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.