Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

umi k-member install problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:51 PM
  #41  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Homeless2bNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 25thhawk
Ramey sent me pictures of the car mounts. They are definitely not truck mounts. I agree with everythin you are saying in terms of fabrication and that really the only important part is the motor mount holes. Although that didn't work out very well for me. You are correct that it is an easy modification. But I don't feel it is right to ask your end customer to modify your "bolt in" parts. It would probably take 3 hours to get it back out of the car, modify it and put it back in. If this part was at a shop, I would be paying the price for it. As it stands, I won't be modifying it. I will just get solid mounts and live with it. Just another added cost that I shouldn't have.

FWIW, looking at the angles of the motor mount stands, if you put the gussets on the bottom instead of the top it should give alot more room to play with around the motor mounts.

Thanks

HEY, wait a sec

i just looked at ur pics and ur mounts look like
absolute sh*t.

they are junk and cracked. well that is to say normally
worn out from 10+years of use.

you problem, in my professional opinion is worn cracked mounts.

not the K-member.

looking at the pics you, can see they are completly
broken and cracked.
the mount hole it sucked in towards the block. no way would it ever fit.

I'll put monet down you couldn't get ur old member back in either.

All the weight and years just wore out the mounts.
easy as that.

you can go with solids, or get new poly ones from Energy.

UMI did it right and pretty sure put out a solid piece.
Old 05-07-2013, 11:04 PM
  #42  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I will agree that the pics make them look like crap. They are not actually that bad. But lets just assume they are junk, for the sake of arguement. Right now the block is wedged between the mounts, no weight on the jack. If new mounts were going to help that, the holes in the mounts would be over top of the holes in the k member, which they clearly aren't.

I have no problem putting my money into poly mounts. But when that doesn't fix the problem, no one is gonna step up and say what is really wrong. And I'm just out another couple hours and more money.
Old 05-08-2013, 07:51 AM
  #43  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Homeless2bNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 25thhawk
I will agree that the pics make them look like crap. They are not actually that bad. But lets just assume they are junk, for the sake of arguement. Right now the block is wedged between the mounts, no weight on the jack. If new mounts were going to help that, the holes in the mounts would be over top of the holes in the k member, which they clearly aren't.

I have no problem putting my money into poly mounts. But when that doesn't fix the problem, no one is gonna step up and say what is really wrong. And I'm just out another couple hours and more money.
do the poly mounts and see.

you need them anyway.

proper diag means eliminating all problems obvious.
Old 05-08-2013, 08:37 AM
  #44  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well you are right about that. I was figuring I would have to go with solids. But I have polys in my other camaro, so I'm gonna take some measurements first and see if mine are really that bad or not. I guess if I go with the poly's and it doesn't fix the problem then there should be no debate about what the problem is.
Old 05-08-2013, 09:01 AM
  #45  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Homeless2bNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 25thhawk
Well you are right about that. I was figuring I would have to go with solids. But I have polys in my other camaro, so I'm gonna take some measurements first and see if mine are really that bad or not. I guess if I go with the poly's and it doesn't fix the problem then there should be no debate about what the problem is.
look at it this way, it a much needed upgrade anyway.

not gonna hurt only help weather it fixes this issue or not.

let us know. hope u get it resolved with this and
go burn up some back roads soon.
Old 05-08-2013, 10:33 AM
  #46  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Homeless2bNY
look at it this way, it a much needed upgrade anyway.

not gonna hurt only help weather it fixes this issue or not.

let us know. hope u get it resolved with this and
go burn up some back roads soon.

I agree with this guy. You need mounts. Period. The k-member is designed around good mounts... not old, worn out stuff.

I mean, you said so yourself, OP, that everything you're putting on your car has needed modification:

Originally Posted by 25thhawk
Yeah this car is driving me nuts. I haven't bought 1 part yet that I can just bolt on. Everything needs modified somehow.
Ryan gave you a very detailed explanation of the manufacturing process which was then verified by Ramey. Really, just put things into perspective here by process of elimination. I know it's frustrating for you, but at the end of the day, it's your car -- not the k-member -- that appears to be the anomaly.

edit:
Oh, another thing that I just thought of... are you sure the mounts haven't been relocated for anything? How about for a manual steering rack conversion or something? Like I said above, the k-members are made for OE-type specs.
Old 05-08-2013, 11:00 AM
  #47  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Homeless2bNY- Thanks i'll update it. I ordered the poly mounts this morning. Not going to be driving it anytime soon though. Still need new a-arms, shocks and springs. Just putting it together 1 piece at a time.

Demonspeed-Everything I have put on this car was not designed for it. I am using a corvette accessory drive so I can use an ecs supercharger kit. I needed a TPI style alternator with an ecs tensioner bracket. Which I needed to modify because it didnt fit the fbody frame rails. A battery box in the spare tire well that I custom made. Parts that weren't made for this car, I have no issue modifying. In fact I really expect that when I order them. Parts that are supposed to fit should not need to be modified.

I'll just give you a small example, not saying this is what is wrong with mine. If the driver side pedastal tubes are too long and you put the parts in the jig. It is possible to line up all the mounting points, but there is no way that it will fit around the motor mounts. Maybe my problem is the mounts, maybe it isn't. Once the poly mounts go in, then I will know for sure. But I would bet the farm that it isn't going to fit without grinding either the clamshell or the k-member. I already made my measurements off my 98 camaro with poly mounts.
Old 05-08-2013, 11:02 AM
  #48  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

nothing was modified. 100% stock before I touched it. It is getting manual steering now, but was stock before the k-member came out.
Old 05-08-2013, 07:37 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
stevo92z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 on new mounts. Every set i've seen removed has had tons of play when removed. Not sure why you would go through the effort of installing an aftermarket k-member on stock mounts? I understand budget is the limiting factor but save up to do it right or just hold off.

Also as the saying goes...bolt on's never are.

Very rarely have i had a part 100% bolt on without any modifying.
Old 05-08-2013, 08:08 PM
  #50  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It wasn't a budget issue. I just didn't see the need to replace them at this point because the motor will be coming out later this year. I just find it hard to believe that I am the only person to ever encounter this problem. I guess everyone else is smarter than me and puts in new mounts at the same time, lol.

FWIW, the k-member is back out and I will be test fitting the mounts before putting them in the car. I can just set the mount at the 45 degree angle of the block and check the clearance. Mounts werent loose, rubber just didn't look so good. Not much play at all.
Old 05-10-2013, 10:27 PM
  #51  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Got the new mounts today and guess what... still need to grind it. It needs to be ground on the passenger rear gusset and driver front gusset. This is with test fitting them out of the car with the mounts at a 45 degree angle. I'm gonna take a little extra off for when it is installed and the weight is on it.
Old 05-11-2013, 10:04 AM
  #52  
scj
TECH Addict
iTrader: (89)
 
scj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

My umi k member was quite tight trying to get the mount bolt through, but it wasn't anything that couldn't be solved with a little prying on the mounts to get them to seat in the right position for the bolt to go through. You can't expect something to stay in the exact same spot after 10+ years of weight, weight shifting and the engine torquing over thousands of times and many bumps down the road. I wouldn't trust a "test fit" by putting the mounts on the k member at a 45* angle before I took a grinder to a $500 kmember. But to each his own. I hope you get it to work.
Old 05-11-2013, 04:22 PM
  #53  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Actually I will say that everything lined right up on the k member. No issues other than the gussets on the mounts. So really not much gringing needed. Just the pain in the *** of removing and reinstalling it. Since I have a digital angle finder, the test fit is more of an exact fit. But I hear you, I would have liked to not use the grinder. Hopefully the a-arms bolt right up easy too. I haven't tried them yet.
Old 05-12-2013, 08:05 PM
  #54  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
25thhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

After grinding the two gussets, everything bolted right in. Got it all buttoned up today. Now I gotta get some new a-arms and shocks.
Old 05-12-2013, 08:57 PM
  #55  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Homeless2bNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

glad to hear its in finally.



Quick Reply: umi k-member install problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.