Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Front End Alignment Specs Needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2014, 06:42 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
TA_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 90 Posts

Default Front End Alignment Specs Needed

Tomorrow morning I'm taking the TA to a shop that is going to align it to my specs instead of just locking things down when it's "in range." This is my daily driver and I spend most of my time on the highway. I'm lowered 1.2" as well.

What angles should I go with regarding toe in, camber and caster?
Old 01-19-2014, 07:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
RedDeadG8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

ive run these specs for the last 5 or so years:
1/16 toe in
+4.5 caster left
+4.7 L - +5.0 caster right (depending on how bad your roads crown)
-0.7 camber

Last edited by RedDeadG8; 01-20-2014 at 07:06 AM.
Old 01-19-2014, 10:13 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
camarokid91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bridgewater, Ma
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I say this every time there is one of these thread.

The most you can go negative on the street for camber is this

-1.5 camber
4.5-5 caster
0 toe

Any more and you are dipping your toes in race only territory.
Old 01-19-2014, 10:28 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
TA_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Thanks ... this is exactly what I'm looking for. I haven't like the last two alignments in the last year.
Firestone:
L R
Camber:-0.7 -0.5
Caster: 5.5 5.1
Toe: -0.03 -0.05

And Kauffman: Which was what I'm riding with now.
Camber: 0 0.3
Caster: 5.9 5.1
Toe: -0.01 -0.02
Old 01-20-2014, 05:58 AM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
leadfoot4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 4,611
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TA_Freak
Thanks ... this is exactly what I'm looking for. I haven't like the last two alignments in the last year.
Firestone:
L R
Camber:-0.7 -0.5
Caster: 5.5 5.1
Toe: -0.03 -0.05

And Kauffman: Which was what I'm riding with now.
Camber: 0 0.3
Caster: 5.9 5.1
Toe: -0.01 -0.02


Who's the "numb-nutz' that dials in more caster on the left side of your car?? You run more caster on the passenger side, to compensate for "road crown", so the car will run straight on most roads.
Old 01-20-2014, 09:07 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
TA_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by leadfoot4
Who's the "numb-nutz' that dials in more caster on the left side of your car?? You run more caster on the passenger side, to compensate for "road crown", so the car will run straight on most roads.
Looks like both Firestone and Kauffman set it like that.

I guess they thought I'd be driving around town in reverse.
Old 01-22-2014, 05:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Carguy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,355
Received 39 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Great thread but I have a noob question. How do the specs given by you guys (who I am sure know more about f bodies) differ from a regular oe shop alignment? Better handling, wear or both?
Old 01-27-2014, 08:53 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
TA_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Got the alignment done today. What a difference .... my steering wheel was actually easier to turn when leaving the shop. Probably because the caster was so jacked up.

I was actually there for 4 hours. The tech (owner) set, checked ....etc... making sure that the angles were set to my specs. The caster was at 6.2° L and 5.5° on the right when I took the car to him
Now it's 5.5° R and 5.2° L. The camber is -0.6 on each side and total toe IN is .05.

I couldn't be happier.

Last edited by TA_Freak; 01-27-2014 at 10:14 PM.
Old 01-27-2014, 09:36 PM
  #9  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Why do you have more caster on the "left" still. Do you mean passenger or driver's side? Left to me is driver's side...
Old 01-27-2014, 10:13 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
TA_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
Why do you have more caster on the "left" still. Do you mean passenger or driver's side? Left to me is driver's side...

Sorry I meant more caster on the right side.
Old 02-02-2014, 10:47 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1 FMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Carguy8888
Great thread but I have a noob question. How do the specs given by you guys (who I am sure know more about f bodies) differ from a regular oe shop alignment? Better handling, wear or both?

they basically don't. the only thing people here tend to do different is have a little more negative camber (tires tilt inward from top to bottom) the thought being it helps cornering. the oem spec is 0° to +0.5° which is the top of the tire tilts outward, because whenever the suspension travels upward the tires gain negative camber so under normal driving you basically have a tire riding flat on the road which is best especially on the highway. whenever you turn the wheel your wheels gain some negative camber anyway. whether setting camber negative to begin really helps at only a 1/2 degree i don't know, i haven't done it so i can't speak from personal experience.
if you're interested in wheel alignment, do a google on "caster camber toe".
http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html

the most important thing especially on the f-body having a 275 width tire is getting the settings even left to right, known as cross-caster=0° and cross-camber=0°.
I would like to see a new car off the showroom floor have the alignment checked and see if they come with more positive caster on the right side to compensate for road crown. i think that's completely stupid to assume all roads slope to the right, they don't. and when they don't, or you find a great road that's flat then what?
with toe settings, on rear wheel drive cars you go positive toe (pointing inwards) because rear wheel drive pushing the car tends to make the front wheels go negative tow. with front wheel drive cars pulling the car the fronts tend to gain positive toe so they get set closer to 0° if not slightly negative. the ideal is to have 0° toe both tires pointing directly straight for best tire wear and fuel economy. positive toe helps with high speed stability and can help take up some slop in the steering rack and can potentially make steering feel tighter. positive toe also causes under-steer. negative toe (pointing outwards) can make the car squirly, eager to want to turn, and cause over-steer. more positive caster (like positive toe) helps make the want to go straight at speed and also will make the steering wheel want to return to center after a turn on it's own and make the steering feel heavy when turning the wheel away from straight.
Old 02-02-2014, 09:35 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Carguy8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,355
Received 39 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1 FMF
they basically don't. the only thing people here tend to do different is have a little more negative camber (tires tilt inward from top to bottom) the thought being it helps cornering. the oem spec is 0° to +0.5° which is the top of the tire tilts outward, because whenever the suspension travels upward the tires gain negative camber so under normal driving you basically have a tire riding flat on the road which is best especially on the highway. whenever you turn the wheel your wheels gain some negative camber anyway. whether setting camber negative to begin really helps at only a 1/2 degree i don't know, i haven't done it so i can't speak from personal experience.
if you're interested in wheel alignment, do a google on "caster camber toe".
http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html

the most important thing especially on the f-body having a 275 width tire is getting the settings even left to right, known as cross-caster=0° and cross-camber=0°.
I would like to see a new car off the showroom floor have the alignment checked and see if they come with more positive caster on the right side to compensate for road crown. i think that's completely stupid to assume all roads slope to the right, they don't. and when they don't, or you find a great road that's flat then what?
with toe settings, on rear wheel drive cars you go positive toe (pointing inwards) because rear wheel drive pushing the car tends to make the front wheels go negative tow. with front wheel drive cars pulling the car the fronts tend to gain positive toe so they get set closer to 0° if not slightly negative. the ideal is to have 0° toe both tires pointing directly straight for best tire wear and fuel economy. positive toe helps with high speed stability and can help take up some slop in the steering rack and can potentially make steering feel tighter. positive toe also causes under-steer. negative toe (pointing outwards) can make the car squirly, eager to want to turn, and cause over-steer. more positive caster (like positive toe) helps make the want to go straight at speed and also will make the steering wheel want to return to center after a turn on it's own and make the steering feel heavy when turning the wheel away from straight.
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me.



Quick Reply: Front End Alignment Specs Needed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.