Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

mevotech lower control arm design issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2022, 06:23 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default mevotech lower control arm design issue

I purchased mevotech upper and lower control arms to hasten my front end rebuild. As I was tighening down the lower shock bolts to the arm to the factory 48 ft-lb my torque wrench would not click and I noticed the bolt only getting longer. The torque load never increased. I took it all apart and confirmed the box frame of the arm is being crushed. Looking through the hole compared to my OEM arm, I see its missing a steel gusset for support. Checked my other arm which I had not installed yet and same thing. Looks to be a design defect/oversight. So my options are return and rebuild the original. Or just not tighten to the factory spec. Say 30-35 which I can get to click and double up on lock nuts? Thoughts? I have not seen this mentioned as an issue in any thread that I could find.


Old 05-28-2022, 10:42 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great, I have those arms too and was going to install them tomorrow. Mine have the gussets on only one side and off location.
Old 05-28-2022, 11:35 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by David_viny
Great, I have those arms too and was going to install them tomorrow. Mine have the gussets on only one side and off location.
Interesting. Can you post pictures to compare?

I rechecked. My oem has two gusset plates on opposite ends of the hole in both holes. The mevo tech arm has no gussets in either hole.
Old 05-29-2022, 11:00 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default




only one side of each new arm has gusset, and it's not directly under hole like it should be...
Old 05-29-2022, 11:10 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very interesting.. I'll need to shine a brighter light to see if there are any offset or simply not there. I didn't look beyond the hole perimeter. Either way I cannot torque to factory specs without deforming the arm.
Old 05-29-2022, 11:58 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,739
Received 844 Likes on 646 Posts

Default

Only option would be to weld a gusset it or stuff a big wad of JB weld between the metal halves.
Old 05-29-2022, 05:42 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by timaishu
Very interesting.. I'll need to shine a brighter light to see if there are any offset or simply not there. I didn't look beyond the hole perimeter. Either way I cannot torque to factory specs without deforming the arm.
Looking through the largest hole on the bottom I actually can see a vertical piece, but like yours it's not adjacent to the bolt hole so I didn't see it initially. But it's for sure only on one side. Either way for me it didn't appear to allow me to torque to spec without giving way. Did you try installing yours yet?
Old 05-30-2022, 10:23 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I received this from Mevotech this morning:

Would you be able to provide some comparison photos of this internal strength gusseting? CMS501138/9 have been benchmarked from OE GM lower control arms, and while the parts are of relative age, we have not been made aware of any issues regarding any flexing of the control arm materials. Regards, MIGUEL NIETES SENIOR TECHNICAL ADVISOR

I will take more detailed photos and get back to them and maybe a video of it yielding under 48ft-lbs. I'll reply back when I know more.
Old 05-31-2022, 07:21 AM
  #9  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by timaishu
Did you try installing yours yet?
I didnt bother, I went straight to making spacers to distribute the load over more area. Not the best solution but should work. Eventually going to go with umi control arms.

I'm installing coilovers so I can adjust for the height difference.




Old 05-31-2022, 09:26 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cajun ELESS-ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Thibodaux LA
Posts: 674
Received 64 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

I bought these last week. Didn't put them on, so need to check if they have the gussets. Thanks for posting this
Old 05-31-2022, 09:46 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Figured I'd update this. The replies are in order.

1. Would you be able to provide some comparison photos of this internal strength gusseting? CMS501138/9 have been benchmarked from OE GM lower control arms, and while the parts are of relative age, we have not been made aware of any issues regarding any flexing of the control arm materials.

2. The photos did arrive and I’ve brought it to engineering’s attention to investigate this further. From what I’ve been made aware of, we are using a higher strength steel which does not require the use of an internal gusset, however it looks like they will need to look into why the mounting surface is curved instead of flat. 48 ft-lbs on high strength steel won’t be enough to straighten the surface, nor will the hardware be adequate to allow for over-torquing to straighten the material.

3. A lot of manufacturers do suggest replacing the lower strut cross shaft hardware when replacing the parts. While the GM factory service manual doesn’t say that for a vehicle this age, modern GM vehicles with similar suspension types do. Depending on the mileage on the vehicle, it may be worth replacing the hardware as preventative all together.

During this back and forth I provided pictures. I noticed too using a straight edge that the mounting surface was in fact not flat as compared to oem. With it off the car I used my old shock and was able to get it to lock down at 48 ft-lbs. I think I bent the surface a bit already as from here it didn't take too long before I got it to click. With the shock mounted, I see it pulled itself flush to the arm in the end. I think it's fine, but definitely not identical to oem. I was pleased with their support. Very articulate and quick to reply. Usually within a few hours once someone grabbed the email.



Last edited by timaishu; 05-31-2022 at 09:56 PM.
Old 06-01-2022, 10:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Cajun ELESS-ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Thibodaux LA
Posts: 674
Received 64 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

I'm thinking about drilling the holes out to accept a metal sleeve, sliding the sleeve in the larger holes, and welding them in. Might be overkill but worth a shot.
Old 07-06-2022, 02:45 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
383z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston/Clear Lake, TX.
Posts: 619
Received 57 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

I just bought these too and good catch @timaishu
Do you all think using washers would work to help distribute the pressure when tightening the bolt?
Old 07-07-2022, 03:40 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
timaishu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 383z
I just bought these too and good catch @timaishu
Do you all think using washers would work to help distribute the pressure when tightening the bolt?
As far as I could tell from a pure visual check, it seemed like the flex was from the top surface of the arm. Mine wasn't totally flat my oem. I think the extra turns on the nut was from the arm flattening under the rectangular shock mount on the top surface. I didn't notice any movement on the button. The bottom also has two sheets of steel under the bolt so I assume that part was fine.
Old 07-08-2022, 12:50 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
ramairetransam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

lovely , i have uppers and lowers for both sides sitting in boxes waiting to go in .



Quick Reply: mevotech lower control arm design issue



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.