H&R Springs and QA1 shocks?
#21
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
I did a little write up on adjusting the Koni's. That should give you a good idea.
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=521349
The SA's should be fine for you. I would even go so far to say that for most people with street cars, the Koni SA in the rear my be overkill. I have the SA's in the back and I played with them, but ended up with the same adjustment most folks have. Full soft. Sam tells me the Bilstein 3rd gen rears have almost the same valving and that is why they are so often used. Doing so saves you about $130. But if you are set on the SA in rear, that is fine too. The stiffer spring of the H+R may need a bit more rebound control.
Most of the folks that get the DA seem to end up putting the compression setting (bump) to full soft anyway. Full soft on the DA is the same compression valving as the SA. So you see why most folks don't get the DA. The rebound adjustment is the main one in determining how the car feels (as far as I know, I don't have the DA's). Too much rebound can make it ride rough, too much air pressure in the front tires can make it ride rough. Too low of ride height in the front or rear can make it ride rough. If you adjust everything just right you can get great handling as well as a not too harsh ride. I mean the factory springs and shocks were a bit on the harsh side, so it's about the same. Certainly not a kidney buster like some other lowered cars.
Don't let trackbird scare you about his shock. He's the only person I ever heard of to bust a shock due to using a very different kind of bumpstop. This is what he, as well as I use.
I measured my suspension travel to make sure the shock wouldn't bottom out, but I don't think he did. He races his, too. So that puts extra stress on the parts. The $570 comes from rebuilding and shortening both his DA rear shocks. I would not suggest you run this bumpstop, but instead to trim the factory one some. That is, much later on when everything is installed and if you feel the need for a bit more rear travel.
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=521349
The SA's should be fine for you. I would even go so far to say that for most people with street cars, the Koni SA in the rear my be overkill. I have the SA's in the back and I played with them, but ended up with the same adjustment most folks have. Full soft. Sam tells me the Bilstein 3rd gen rears have almost the same valving and that is why they are so often used. Doing so saves you about $130. But if you are set on the SA in rear, that is fine too. The stiffer spring of the H+R may need a bit more rebound control.
Most of the folks that get the DA seem to end up putting the compression setting (bump) to full soft anyway. Full soft on the DA is the same compression valving as the SA. So you see why most folks don't get the DA. The rebound adjustment is the main one in determining how the car feels (as far as I know, I don't have the DA's). Too much rebound can make it ride rough, too much air pressure in the front tires can make it ride rough. Too low of ride height in the front or rear can make it ride rough. If you adjust everything just right you can get great handling as well as a not too harsh ride. I mean the factory springs and shocks were a bit on the harsh side, so it's about the same. Certainly not a kidney buster like some other lowered cars.
Don't let trackbird scare you about his shock. He's the only person I ever heard of to bust a shock due to using a very different kind of bumpstop. This is what he, as well as I use.
I measured my suspension travel to make sure the shock wouldn't bottom out, but I don't think he did. He races his, too. So that puts extra stress on the parts. The $570 comes from rebuilding and shortening both his DA rear shocks. I would not suggest you run this bumpstop, but instead to trim the factory one some. That is, much later on when everything is installed and if you feel the need for a bit more rear travel.
#22
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by JakeFusion
I was in behind a Civic that had been lowered down way too much. With every dip in the road the backend was bouncing and shifting around.
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by JasonWW
The stiffer spring of the H+R may need a bit more rebound control.
Most of the folks that get the DA seem to end up putting the compression setting (bump) to full soft anyway. Full soft on the DA is the same compression valving as the SA. So you see why most folks don't get the DA. The rebound adjustment is the main one in determining how the car feels (as far as I know, I don't have the DA's). Too much rebound can make it ride rough, too much air pressure in the front tires can make it ride rough. Too low of ride height in the front or rear can make it ride rough. If you adjust everything just right you can get great handling as well as a not too harsh ride. I mean the factory springs and shocks were a bit on the harsh side, so it's about the same. Certainly not a kidney buster like some other lowered cars.
Don't let trackbird scare you about his shock. He's the only person I ever heard of to bust a shock due to using a very different kind of bumpstop. This is what he, as well as I use.
I measured my suspension travel to make sure the shock wouldn't bottom out, but I don't think he did. He races his, too. So that puts extra stress on the parts. The $570 comes from rebuilding and shortening both his DA rear shocks. I would not suggest you run this bumpstop, but instead to trim the factory one some. That is, much later on when everything is installed and if you feel the need for a bit more rear travel.
Most of the folks that get the DA seem to end up putting the compression setting (bump) to full soft anyway. Full soft on the DA is the same compression valving as the SA. So you see why most folks don't get the DA. The rebound adjustment is the main one in determining how the car feels (as far as I know, I don't have the DA's). Too much rebound can make it ride rough, too much air pressure in the front tires can make it ride rough. Too low of ride height in the front or rear can make it ride rough. If you adjust everything just right you can get great handling as well as a not too harsh ride. I mean the factory springs and shocks were a bit on the harsh side, so it's about the same. Certainly not a kidney buster like some other lowered cars.
Don't let trackbird scare you about his shock. He's the only person I ever heard of to bust a shock due to using a very different kind of bumpstop. This is what he, as well as I use.
I measured my suspension travel to make sure the shock wouldn't bottom out, but I don't think he did. He races his, too. So that puts extra stress on the parts. The $570 comes from rebuilding and shortening both his DA rear shocks. I would not suggest you run this bumpstop, but instead to trim the factory one some. That is, much later on when everything is installed and if you feel the need for a bit more rear travel.
Actually, when my rear Koni's were being rebuilt. I put decarbons on the rear. The ride was much worse than my Koni's because decarbons have a ton of compression damping built into them. They are super stiff in compression (way more than needed) and don't have nearly enough rebound (the car is stiff, but "floaty" with them). So, the koni's will help the ride. And, I do use more than a "0" setting on my compression, but many don't.
All I was saying was to measure your clearance. If you run that bump stop with DA's on these cars, you run the very real risk of damaging a shock (yes I do race mine, but a good pothole could do it as well). I can't speak for other shocks, but I can tell you what we found when we measured/worked through the damage to my shocks (it was a 12 page thread or so when it was all overwith).
And, DA's are really not needed on a street car. Just in case anyone was going to ask.
Your results may vary.