subfrane connectors?
#5
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 99midnightZ
the only thing i dont understand is.... is there a big difference between the umi bolt on or weld ons?
I am very happy with my boxed UMI weld-on SFC's.
#13
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by BLCKBRD
Is there any ground clearence issues with the boxed style SFC?
We also just released a 2-point tubular design that tucks up very well and causes no clearance at all. Here is the link, if I can help with any questions please ask.
http://www.umiperformance.com/Search...?CategoryID=42
Thank you!
Ryan
#14
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The KBDD's and the UMI's are nice. I have the KBDD and did alot of research before I bought them. I have been extremely happy w/ them and I might have bought the UMI's if they were out when I got mine. Weld in is definitely the way to go.
#16
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
how about the SLP 3-point vs. the 3-point UMI's? Any particular one better than the other? I am stuck with the same dilemma of which subframes to get. I would like a 3-point design but I am stuck between the UMI's or the SLP's. Any help comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.