save pontiac petition
#21
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most of the large companies are moving to OVER SEAS LOCATIONS. This will not help our workers here at home. Also we cannot hardly buy USA anymore because it has to come from OVER SEAS. That is exactly where GM is going!!!!! They will also do it on BAILOUT MONEY. What about paying people to not work???? Is that a lie ????? READ THIS
The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
You might expect it from right-leaning commentators like Will Wilkinson. You wouldn't expect it from someone like Mark Perry, who lives in Flint, Michigan. And you certainly wouldn't expect to see it in the New York Times, from the likes of Andrew Ross Sorkin. But all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include health and pension costs.
It's not true.
The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers.
Now that GM's healthcare obligations are being moved to a UAW-run trust, even that fictitious number is going to fall sharply. But anybody who uses it as a rhetorical device suggesting that US car companies are run inefficiently is being disingenuous. As of 2007, the UAW represented 180,681 members at Chrysler, Ford and General Motors; it also represented 419,621 retired members and 120,723 surviving spouses. If you take the costs associated with 721,025 individuals and then divide those costs by the hours worked by 180,681 individuals, you're going to end up with a very large hourly rate. But it won't mean anything, unless you're trying to be deceptive.
THE UNION HELPED GET THIS SETUP.....This shows where the high pay number come from
The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
You might expect it from right-leaning commentators like Will Wilkinson. You wouldn't expect it from someone like Mark Perry, who lives in Flint, Michigan. And you certainly wouldn't expect to see it in the New York Times, from the likes of Andrew Ross Sorkin. But all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include health and pension costs.
It's not true.
The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers.
Now that GM's healthcare obligations are being moved to a UAW-run trust, even that fictitious number is going to fall sharply. But anybody who uses it as a rhetorical device suggesting that US car companies are run inefficiently is being disingenuous. As of 2007, the UAW represented 180,681 members at Chrysler, Ford and General Motors; it also represented 419,621 retired members and 120,723 surviving spouses. If you take the costs associated with 721,025 individuals and then divide those costs by the hours worked by 180,681 individuals, you're going to end up with a very large hourly rate. But it won't mean anything, unless you're trying to be deceptive.
THE UNION HELPED GET THIS SETUP.....This shows where the high pay number come from
Last edited by vette; 01-02-2009 at 11:38 AM. Reason: correct it
#22
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok to get this thread back on track. I think pontiac should stay and chevy should die (excluding trucks and corvette of course). They have been the most successful lately in creating a pretty cool line of cars G6, G8, Solstice. I have driven both G6 and G8 as rentals and they are pretty good compared to Chevy (impala, malibu, cobalt). BORING. ![GTFO](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/gtfoslap.gif)
Anyway so GM, Pontiac, and maybe Saturn and thats it. OH and stop making a new failure of a car like the HHR every year!
And Dodge needs to bring back the Nitro!
![GTFO](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/gtfoslap.gif)
Anyway so GM, Pontiac, and maybe Saturn and thats it. OH and stop making a new failure of a car like the HHR every year!
![Barf](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_barf.gif)
Your thinking would work if everyone was a "car person". They're not. Most people see a car as a means of transportation, and as long as it has a cupholder for their double shot espresso mocha latte, they don't care what it runs in the quarter.
I stand by what I've said before. GM (in the US, at least) needs to be Chevrolet and Cadillac. Sell or shutter everything else. Re-tool the factories to make Silverados OR Sierras (as an example), but not both. If they can prove they can make a profit, THEN they can look into bringing back some of the other badges.
-Mike
#23
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, TX / Boston, MA
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i'm going to ditto nine ball on this one... assembly line workers are not skilled laborers and certainly shouldnt be paid as such.
the unions may have been needed way back in the day to fix all the unsafe factory conditions and whatnot, but now they serve little purpose than to strongarm the corporations. My father works a labor job (runs a landscaping company) and most of his friends are laborers as well. he first hand knows union employees that worked on "The Big Dig" tunnel project in boston. He personally knows multiple people that made over $30/hr to sit in a truck all day and fill a diesel generator twice a day, or make two trips a day in a dumptruck that they sit around in, waiting for it to get filled. its total BS and that big dig debacle cost the tax payers over $14Billion more than it should have.
I aint saying that corporations arent to blame, but allowing the unions to strong arm them over the years is definitely a business decisions that i do blame them for.
#24
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most of the large companies are moving to OVER SEAS LOCATIONS. This will not help our workers here at home. Also we cannot hardly buy USA anymore because it has to come from OVER SEAS. That is exactly where GM is going!!!!! They will also do it on BAILOUT MONEY. What about paying people to not work???? Is that a lie ????? READ THIS
The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
You might expect it from right-leaning commentators like Will Wilkinson. You wouldn't expect it from someone like Mark Perry, who lives in Flint, Michigan. And you certainly wouldn't expect to see it in the New York Times, from the likes of Andrew Ross Sorkin. But all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include health and pension costs.
It's not true.
The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers.
Now that GM's healthcare obligations are being moved to a UAW-run trust, even that fictitious number is going to fall sharply. But anybody who uses it as a rhetorical device suggesting that US car companies are run inefficiently is being disingenuous. As of 2007, the UAW represented 180,681 members at Chrysler, Ford and General Motors; it also represented 419,621 retired members and 120,723 surviving spouses. If you take the costs associated with 721,025 individuals and then divide those costs by the hours worked by 180,681 individuals, you're going to end up with a very large hourly rate. But it won't mean anything, unless you're trying to be deceptive.
THE UNION HELPED GET THIS SETUP.....This shows where the high pay number come from
The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
You might expect it from right-leaning commentators like Will Wilkinson. You wouldn't expect it from someone like Mark Perry, who lives in Flint, Michigan. And you certainly wouldn't expect to see it in the New York Times, from the likes of Andrew Ross Sorkin. But all of them are perpetuating the meme that the average GM worker costs more than $70 an hour, once you include health and pension costs.
It's not true.
The average GM assembly-line worker makes about $28 per hour in wages, and I can assure you that GM is not paying $42 an hour in health insurance and pension plan contributions. Rather, the $70 per hour figure (or $73 an hour, or whatever) is a ridiculous number obtained by adding up GM's total labor, health, and pension costs, and then dividing by the total number of hours worked. In other words, it includes all the healthcare and retirement costs of retired workers.
Now that GM's healthcare obligations are being moved to a UAW-run trust, even that fictitious number is going to fall sharply. But anybody who uses it as a rhetorical device suggesting that US car companies are run inefficiently is being disingenuous. As of 2007, the UAW represented 180,681 members at Chrysler, Ford and General Motors; it also represented 419,621 retired members and 120,723 surviving spouses. If you take the costs associated with 721,025 individuals and then divide those costs by the hours worked by 180,681 individuals, you're going to end up with a very large hourly rate. But it won't mean anything, unless you're trying to be deceptive.
THE UNION HELPED GET THIS SETUP.....This shows where the high pay number come from
__________________
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic3451_2.gif)
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic3451_2.gif)
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
#25
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
of course not... and if you only make $15/hr, then you should have the intelligence and responsibility to not have kids that you cant afford to have. its like when people argue that the minimum wage should be increased to a 'living wage'... well who the F makes minimum wage? high school kids working at supermarkets or at the mall folding clothes or flipping burgers. if you are 30 years old and making minimum wage, then something is wrong with you.
i'm going to ditto nine ball on this one... assembly line workers are not skilled laborers and certainly shouldnt be paid as such.
the unions may have been needed way back in the day to fix all the unsafe factory conditions and whatnot, but now they serve little purpose than to strongarm the corporations. My father works a labor job (runs a landscaping company) and most of his friends are laborers as well. he first hand knows union employees that worked on "The Big Dig" tunnel project in boston. He personally knows multiple people that made over $30/hr to sit in a truck all day and fill a diesel generator twice a day, or make two trips a day in a dumptruck that they sit around in, waiting for it to get filled. its total BS and that big dig debacle cost the tax payers over $14Billion more than it should have.
I aint saying that corporations arent to blame, but allowing the unions to strong arm them over the years is definitely a business decisions that i do blame them for.
i'm going to ditto nine ball on this one... assembly line workers are not skilled laborers and certainly shouldnt be paid as such.
the unions may have been needed way back in the day to fix all the unsafe factory conditions and whatnot, but now they serve little purpose than to strongarm the corporations. My father works a labor job (runs a landscaping company) and most of his friends are laborers as well. he first hand knows union employees that worked on "The Big Dig" tunnel project in boston. He personally knows multiple people that made over $30/hr to sit in a truck all day and fill a diesel generator twice a day, or make two trips a day in a dumptruck that they sit around in, waiting for it to get filled. its total BS and that big dig debacle cost the tax payers over $14Billion more than it should have.
I aint saying that corporations arent to blame, but allowing the unions to strong arm them over the years is definitely a business decisions that i do blame them for.
$14,000,000,000.00 over budget because some workers were making a few dollars more an hour than you think they should?
$14,000,000,000.00/($15/hr. "overpaid")= close to 1,000,000,000 man hours It seems like there was more going on there than some "unskilled, untrained dumptruck driver strong arming a corporation".
Try and see the whole picture not just what the heads of the companies want you to see.
#27
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There are thousands of people that go to work for GM and Ford everyday that no longer have jobs. They sit in cafeterias for 8 hours a day doing absolutely nothing while receiving their full wages. Their jobs no longer exist (plant closings) but the union will not cut jobs. Unions used to have a place. Now they are not allowing these American icons to change to adapt to the times.
You ask how I know? I grew up near Detroit and I know tons of people who work for / used to work for the big 3 in both union and union jobs. The power of the UAW in Detroit is nothing like any union in Texas.
You ask how I know? I grew up near Detroit and I know tons of people who work for / used to work for the big 3 in both union and union jobs. The power of the UAW in Detroit is nothing like any union in Texas.
#28
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, TX / Boston, MA
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
$14,000,000,000.00 over budget because some workers were making a few dollars more an hour than you think they should?
$14,000,000,000.00/($15/hr. "overpaid")= close to 1,000,000,000 man hours It seems like there was more going on there than some "unskilled, untrained dumptruck driver strong arming a corporation".
Try and see the whole picture not just what the heads of the companies want you to see.
$14,000,000,000.00/($15/hr. "overpaid")= close to 1,000,000,000 man hours It seems like there was more going on there than some "unskilled, untrained dumptruck driver strong arming a corporation".
Try and see the whole picture not just what the heads of the companies want you to see.
#29
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Union is outdated. People at the plant need to be paid according to their task. $30/hour to install a windshield all day is wayyyyy too much. Yes health insurance is high....everyone I know has to pay so why should union workers get it for damn near free??