Bluray question???
as far as the movie, it also depends on the way they filmed and edited the movie, some movies will be better just because of the camera used during filming and things of that nature.
http://www.thx.com/home/dvd/optimizer/index.html
As for cables, all they need to do is be able to carry the repeatable bandwidth over the distance. Short cables have better quality. You only really need high quality cable when you have a long distance to cover. Check Bluejeancables.com. Basically if a cable can carry the signal at least 100 feet it is considered "broadcast quality". They sell "broadcast quality" HDMI 3 footers for 15ish bucks last time I checked.
The only other thing that matters is the connectors. Most everyone uses gold platted connectors and they are basically all created equal. The monster is not bad cable, it is actually good quality, its just about 8 times more expensive then it should be.
- Mark
The suggestion on the presets was to the thread starter.
With the grain on his screen.Your pervious post, about the cables, mhz, etc. I was agreeing with you.

btw:
Someone noted the length and signal drop... 6ft and 12ft of wire makes no differance man. You need to be at 100ft to see any type of drop.
-J
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
And yes, 5 dollar hdmi cables are as good as 100 dollar hdmi cables.
Buy all your cables here: http://www.monoprice.com/home/index.asp
OP, was one of the blu rays you watched 300 by chance? You are just seeing "film grain". It's normal, some blu ray transfers will be better than others.
Look here: http://forums.highdefdigest.com/blu-...m-blu-ray.html
Last edited by TLUZLS1; Jan 20, 2009 at 04:35 PM.
My bluray movies are sharp, clear and smooth and the sound is amazing.
You get what you pay for and with size comes cost.
This is what a clear/sharp 70" TV costs Sony 70XBR7
My bluray movies are sharp, clear and smooth and the sound is amazing.
You get what you pay for and with size comes cost.
This is what a clear/sharp 70" TV costs Sony 70XBR7
There is a difference as with anything else.
Try this - See if you can get Ice Age, Open Season or similar movie on BluRay. If those don't look amazing then something is off with one of the components.
With the grain on his screen.Your pervious post, about the cables, mhz, etc. I was agreeing with you.

btw:
Someone noted the length and signal drop... 6ft and 12ft of wire makes no differance man. You need to be at 100ft to see any type of drop.
-J

I hate the way they calibrate them at the factory. The always overdo it to get them to stand out against other TVs in the showroom, so you always want to readjust them to your particular viewing environment.
....
Look here: http://forums.highdefdigest.com/blu-...m-blu-ray.html

I've been in video engineering for several years now. Would you like to take this discussion to the next level?

Most of the people here don't care.
Me, this is my dream display device:
http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/07/30...stem-unveiled/
Oh, and I checked high-def digest, but they hadn't reviewed the OP's title yet.
And here's some empirical data about the cables:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hdmi-cabl...t-2-268788.php
For today's 1080p, you're fine with the shorter, cheaper cables. If you're planning on 1440p anytime soon, spend the money for the Monster cables provided they're not on too long of a run. You'll just have to wait awhile for a video standard beyond today's Blu-ray spec to take advantage of it. Now if you're going into a wall for an overhead projector, you'll want the better quality. I'll use this in my media room when I get it built. And I did pre-wire my in-wall 7.1 system with Monster cabling.
Last edited by CySevans; Jan 20, 2009 at 09:24 PM.
Last edited by tigertank; Jan 21, 2009 at 01:58 PM.
Agreed, take a bit of messing with but once its set its well worth it.
-J



