Paging Wizeass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009, 12:48 PM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
slowredz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There is so much stupid in this thread
slowredz is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 12:50 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
TINKRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Postman
what concept is he not grasping?

if a head has to move air on its own it needs to be as efficient as possible...everyone knows that...on a N/A motor the better the heads the more power you can make.

if it has a hairdryer ramming it down its throat it doesn't matter how big the ports are the air is going in it....end of discussion...all you have to do to get more power out of a turbo car is turn the boost up....you can have the shittiest heads ever on a turbo car and still make as much power as a N/A car with good heads...

and like Mike said, better heads on either setup will make a difference...but he's saying a N/A motor with **** heads will lose more than a turbo car with those same heads...make sense??

The turbo makes up for the heads being inefficient.
i understand a n/a setup is more reliant on a good set of heads, but we're talking about FI and stock heads.

you can only cram so much air down a narrow intake runner...you can only get so much air out through an unported exhaust chamber. so the answer is YES ported heads do make a difference on a turbo application. is it as critical as a n/a setup? no, but yes it makes a differernce.

let me see someone cram 5lbs of **** down a coffee stirring straw....now let me see someone cram 5lbs of **** down a paper towel roll....
TINKRD is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 12:50 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
TINKRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slowredz
There is so much stupid in this thread
a whole lot of it.
TINKRD is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 12:58 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
The Postman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TINKRD
i understand a n/a setup is more reliant on a good set of heads, but we're talking about FI and stock heads.

you can only cram so much air down a narrow intake runner...you can only get so much air out through an unported exhaust chamber. so the answer is YES ported heads do make a difference on a turbo application. is it as critical as a n/a setup? no, but yes it makes a differernce.

let me see someone cram 5lbs of **** down a coffee stirring straw....now let me see someone cram 5lbs of **** down a paper towel roll....
thats the only point i was trying to make, you'll see more of a gain on a N/A motor than on a FI motor.
The Postman is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 12:58 PM
  #25  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
slowredz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I bet aftermarket heads pick up 100+ more rear wheel horsepower on a turbo car than they do on a naturally aspirated motor
slowredz is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 01:04 PM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
The Postman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well yea if you leave the boost turned up. the good thing that comes from running a good head on a FI car is that you can in turn cut the boost in half and still make the same HP
The Postman is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 03:53 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Reject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,195
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

almost 2 full pages of quack quack
Reject is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 04:54 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This thread hurts my head. Lol.

Somebody needs to go back to the basics of turbo cars. Why do all the 4-bangers put huge intake manifolds, and wild port jobs on their turbo setups???
I8ASaleen is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 05:23 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by I8ASaleen
This thread hurts my head. Lol.

Somebody needs to go back to the basics of turbo cars. Why do all the 4-bangers put huge intake manifolds, and wild port jobs on their turbo setups???
Because it makes more power, is more efficient, lowers EGTs, etc. But I bet you knew that already.
xfactor_pitbulls is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:19 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
 
vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default answer this question

If you have 10 psi boost on stock heads, what would your boost be with ported and polished heads set up for the blower? Should the boost drop or go up in pressure????? What would happen to the HP output???

??????
vette is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:20 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
slowredz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Postman
well yea if you leave the boost turned up. the good thing that comes from running a good head on a FI car is that you can in turn cut the boost in half and still make the same HP
Who cares about "upgrading" and making the same power
slowredz is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:32 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
 
vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Actually

Originally Posted by The Postman
well yea if you leave the boost turned up. the good thing that comes from running a good head on a FI car is that you can in turn cut the boost in half and still make the same HP
It may mean that your heads are using 1/2 of your boost pressure. Therefore if you cut it in 1/2 you will not see a change in hp. Maybe the heads are only utilizing a smaller flow than your FI can put out!!!!! THEY NEED TO BE PORTED TO PASS MOST AIR TO THE ENGINE, there fore your boost pressure would drop as your flow has increased. Then you can get all your stock motor can handle....

vette
vette is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 07:59 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Postman
what concept is he not grasping?

if a head has to move air on its own it needs to be as efficient as possible...everyone knows that...on a N/A motor the better the heads the more power you can make.

if it has a hairdryer ramming it down its throat it doesn't matter how big the ports are the air is going in it....end of discussion...all you have to do to get more power out of a turbo car is turn the boost up....you can have the shittiest heads ever on a turbo car and still make as much power as a N/A car with good heads...

and like Mike said, better heads on either setup will make a difference...but he's saying a N/A motor with **** heads will lose more than a turbo car with those same heads...make sense??

The turbo makes up for the heads being inefficient.
bingo...that is my point.... a turbo car saying his heads suck doesnt mean **** compared to an NA guy saying the same thing.

they bitch at me about excuses yet produce the same ****. I just called em on it.
WizeAss is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 08:49 PM
  #34  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Blowers have a different dynamic than turbos. Turbos are based on air flow, and density. So if you have a larger runner that flows more they spin faster and quicker. It does have to translate to an exhaust port that is efficient and can keep up with the increase of used A/F. Otherwise you just increase EGTs, for a slight HP gain. Blowers are a fixed output based on RPM, but it still equates to some type of bottleneck of the runners and combustion chamber. Again, with EGTs being the indicator. Low boost, low EGT, good HP makes a well setup car that will last. Same thing goes for an nitrous car. That **** has to get out the back out without being too hot and tearing **** up. There are several cars here local that put some sickass setups on the track and make a pass or two with catastrophic results. You guys know who you are. And they are because you can buy parts and know **** about setting up a engine and tune. Good luck running the time Mike.
xfactor_pitbulls is offline  
Old 07-31-2009, 10:42 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
TINKRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WizeAss
bingo...that is my point.... a turbo car saying his heads suck doesnt mean **** compared to an NA guy saying the same thing.

they bitch at me about excuses yet produce the same ****. I just called em on it.

who the **** compared anything to a N/A setup you ******* moron. jesus christ.

i said to Viciuos i'm limimted to about 800 HP or so due to STOCK heads. what dont you ******* get about that. its not a ******* excuse its a fact.
TINKRD is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:06 AM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TINKRD
who the **** compared anything to a N/A setup you ******* moron. jesus christ.

i said to Viciuos i'm limimted to about 800 HP or so due to STOCK heads. what dont you ******* get about that. its not a ******* excuse its a fact.

"I have stock heads"


sounded like an excuse to me.

The hypocracy around here is insane!
WizeAss is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:11 AM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TINKRD

The turbo will be getting finished this winter. Should be out this spring  I’ll be running on stock heads like you for a little bit.
Originally Posted by TINKRD
Idiot…

i should be able to drag you on stock heads, so dont worry
So, you are on stock heads....

that is like me saying:

I have a **** converter
I have a 270cc intake port
I don't have tires
I have a baby cam
I have low bottle pressure
I am missing parts

blah blah blah...

I was only pointing out that you having stock heads on a forced induction car is a really dumb excuse to use on why your car is _____insert whatever here_______.

Just sayin.... you paged me.... not the other way around.
WizeAss is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:19 AM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
WizeAss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TINKRD
who the **** compared anything to a N/A setup you ******* moron. jesus christ.

i said to Viciuos i'm limimted to about 800 HP or so due to STOCK heads. what dont you ******* get about that. its not a ******* excuse its a fact.
I was stating that it is not like you are running NA with stock heads.... so the fact that you will have a FI car with stock heads is not that big of a deal... you are forcing air down the intake runner. Now you can increase the boost to a point were the heads not flowing create an issue... but that won't be at 7-12lbs of boost..... you should easily get to 800rwhp on stock heads. My car only makes 630-700.....
WizeAss is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:44 AM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Vcious04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alvarado, Texas
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TINKRD
who the **** compared anything to a N/A setup you ******* moron. jesus christ.

i said to Viciuos i'm limimted to about 800 HP or so due to STOCK heads. what dont you ******* get about that. its not a ******* excuse its a fact.
+1, Mikey, you can only get out so much power from a casting, PERIOD you fool.

More flow/Better Velocity = More HP, PERIOD

Once again Mikey, stick to yes or no answer, do not elaborate anymore in front of people.
Vcious04 is offline  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:47 AM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Vcious04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alvarado, Texas
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WizeAss
My car only makes 630-700.....
I haven't said this to you before, but if I have a $8k Longblock and a 250 shot and only managed to throw 63xrwhp down and run mid 6's I would take that pile to the edge of the earth and push it off.
Vcious04 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.