2009 state law updates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2009, 01:58 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
LS1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere down in Texas
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2009 state law updates

These are NOT all the new laws but more of a highlight list. I highlighted the ones most applicable to the members here.

New traffic, criminal laws set to go into effect Sept. 1 HB 2730 is the DPS’s Sunset Legislation, and many of the DPS-related bills this session were included in HB 2730. Notable traffic and criminal laws that go into effect on Sept. 1 (unless otherwise indicated) include*:

Seatbelts:
HB 537 requires all occupants of a vehicle, no matter their age, to be secured by a safety belt, no matter where they are seated in the vehicle; changes the definition of a passenger vehicle to include a passenger van designed to transport 15 or fewer passengers including the driver; removes the current exemption for third-party Medicaid transportation provisions regarding the use of child passenger safety seats; and prohibits a motorcycle operator from carrying a passenger under the age of 5 unless the child is seated in a sidecar attached to the motorcycle.

SB 61 amends the existing statute regarding child passenger safety seats. The bill requires that any child younger than 8 years of age be restrained in an approved child passenger safety seat unless the child is at least 4 feet, 9 inches in height. The fine is no more than $25 for a first offense and $250 for a second offense. The law also creates a new court cost for conviction of an offense under this section to be collected and used by TxDOT to buy safety seats for low income families. This is some serious BS. I don't know of a single hospital that doesn't give you a child seat when your kid is born, so no one should be without a seat and we shouldn't have to pay for it if they are. The law becomes effective on Sept. 1, 2009, but tickets for this offense cannot be issued until June 1, 2010. Police officers are allowed to issue a warning before that date.

Driving:
HB 55 makes it illegal to use a wireless communication device in a school zone unless the vehicle is stopped or a hands-free device is used. Cities or counties wanting to enforce this law must post a sign at the beginning of each school zone to inform drivers that using a wireless communications device is prohibited and the operator is subject to a fine. It is a defense to prosecution if the operator was making an emergency call.

HB 2730 increases the penalties for driving while intoxicated with a child passenger by adding an automatic driver license suspension period for first-time offenders and an increased suspension period for repeat offenders. The driver license re-instatement fee for completing an education program will rise from $50 to $100. Closes a loophole so a person who commits an offense as a minor cannot circumvent the driver license penalty if the person turns 21 before their court date.

HB 2730 allows a new Texas resident to operate a vehicle without a Texas license for 90 days instead of the current 30. (This provision went into effect on June 19, 2009.)

HB 2012 creates two new punishment enhancements: a Class B misdemeanor if a person drives with a suspended license and without insurance; and a class A misdemeanor if the person driving without insurance or a valid driver license has an accident and someone is seriously injured or dies as a result of that accident.

SB 129 authorizes neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) to be operated on roads with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour or less. The bill authorizes driver license holders to operate NEVs without having a motorcycle endorsement, clarifies that drivers and passengers in such vehicles are not required to wear helmets and specifies that enclosed three-wheeled vehicles as described in the bill are authorized to operate in preferential lanes.

Concealed handgun:
HB 2730 amends numerous provisions regarding concealed handgun licenses (CHLs), including eliminating student loan defaults as a disqualifier, to clarify that DPS must suspend or revoke a license when the licensee becomes ineligible and mandating that a magistrate suspend a CHL held by the subject of an emergency protective order.



HB 2664 provides a defense to prosecution if a concealed handgun license holder carries a concealed handgun into an establishment that gets 51 percent or more of its income from the sale of alcoholic beverages, but has failed to post the statutorily required notice that it derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale of alcoholic beverages. (Under current law, a concealed handgun licensee can be charged with a Class A misdemeanor for doing this.)


HB 2730 removes DPS authority to suspend a concealed handgun license (CHL) for the holder’s failure to display the CHL to a peace officer on demand. It removes associated penalties and suspensions for the failure to display.


Driver license:
HB 2730 requires that all applicants under the age of 18 take the driving skills exam to receive a driver license. The law also requires that a provisional driver license (under 18) or instruction permit expire on an individual’s 18th birthday, removes the requirement that a provisional driver license or instruction permit be renewed annually and increases the fee for those licenses from $5 to $15. It also extends the current phase-two restrictions for holders of a graduated driver license from 6 months to 1 year. These restrictions include limited night driving, prohibited use of wireless communication devices and a limited number of passengers.

HB 339 increases the total hours of behind-the-wheel driving instruction a teen receives from 14 to 34 and creates an adult driver education requirement for applicants older than 18 and younger than 21. SB 1317 creates a six-hour driver education course required for driver license applicants 18 years of age or older. It also mandates that applicants 25 or under must submit to an approved driver education course. (Goes into effect March 1, 2010.)

SB 328 gives DPS the power to suspend a minor’s driver license if they fail a breath or blood alcohol test while operating a watercraft. Chapter 524 of the Transportation Code also clearly defines the suspension period for an individual who was under the age of 21 at the time when the offense of boating under the influence or driving under the influence of alcohol occurred. The law also increases the reinstatement fee for a license suspended under sections 49.04-49.08, Penal Code from $50 to $100. HB 2730 increases the driver license sanction from a one-year CDL license disqualification to a lifetime disqualification if a person uses a motor vehicle to transport, conceal or harbor an alien. If a child is engaged in conduct involving a severe form of trafficking persons, a judge at a juvenile hearing is required to order the juvenile’s driver license or permit to be suspended.

HB 2730 prohibits DPS from issuing a driver license or identification card to a person who has not established a domicile in Texas. The law specifies that an applicant may receive a driver license at a post office box only if the applicant’s residence address has also been provided, with some exceptions. Crime:

HB 558 allows minors to be charged with public intoxication. Meaning that now people under 17 can actually be taken to juvenile detention instead of only ticketed and released to their parents

HB 2386 allows courts to immediately seal juvenile criminal records if the juvenile successfully completes a drug court program, or another special program ordered by the court.

HB 1282 makes it a Class B misdemeanor to steal a driver license, commercial driver license or personal identification.

SB 554 makes it illegal to own or possess dog-fighting equipment and establishes that such equipment and property where dogs are found to be engaged in dog fighting is contraband and is subject to forfeiture. The law also makes dog-fighting subject to the elevated penalties authorized in the Texas Penal Code, Section 71.02(a), in an effort to deter organized criminal activity.
Continued in next post........................
Old 08-12-2009, 01:59 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
LS1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere down in Texas
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

.....
HB 1813 makes it a third-degree felony to tamper with forensic, medical, chemical, toxicological and ballistic reports, as well as reports of certification, inspection or maintenance of instruments used to examine or test physical evidence. (Currently, someone who does this can only be charged with a state jail felony.)

HB 358 allows law enforcement authorities to store only a small part of gambling machines that have been seized, instead of storing the whole machine. They would be able to remove and store just the computer chips in gambling machines, which are the core of the machines and contain the information necessary for prosecutions to go forward. Registered sex offenders:

SB 689 restricts Internet usage by certain registered sex offenders, and requires registered sex offenders to provide information about their e-mail addresses when they register. Motorcycles etc.:

Senate Bill 1967 requires that applicants for an original class M license or class A, B or C driver license (including commercial driver licenses and permits) with authorization to operate a motorcycle, provide evidence of completion of an approved motorcycle operator training course. It also repeals the helmet exemption sticker program. Current law requires a person be covered with a minimum of $10,000 in health insurance for injuries incurred in a motorcycle accident to be eligible for an exception for the offense of operating or riding a motorcycle without a helmet. As of Sept. 1, the minimum amount is removed. The bill requires the Texas Department of Insurance to prescribe a standard proof of health insurance for issuance to persons who are at least 21 years of age and covered by an applicable health insurance plan. The law also increases the penalty for failure to yield the right-of-way if there is a crash that results in injury to a person other than the motorcycle operator.

Vehicle inspection:
SB 589 requires that a vehicle equipment safety compliance label be placed on a windshield, side or rear window stating that the window tinting complies with the appropriate provisions of the Transportation Code. Failing to place the required label on the vehicle could lead to a $1,000 fine.


Miscellaneous:
HB 2730 increases the fine for a parking violation at the state Capitol from $10 to $25, and increases the late fee from $2 to $5. SB 1188 authorizes a Texas resident to buy firearms, ammunition or firearms accessories in any other state, not just those contiguous to Texas, to reflect updated federal statutes.
Old 08-12-2009, 02:22 PM
  #3  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Thanks for the update, good info.
Old 08-12-2009, 02:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

HB 309 is still dead in the water.

Old 08-12-2009, 03:59 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
LS1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere down in Texas
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blue's_Z28
HB 309 is still dead in the water.

I don't know half of the bills and I didn't remember this one so I searched it. From the title it would have made a 1 license plate requirement. Of all the laws that are enacted every year and all the great ones that are shot down, this is about the least important one I could think of. So why are you so upset it didn't get voted in? I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for this to get voted in anytime soon.
Old 08-12-2009, 04:08 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1nterceptor
I don't know half of the bills and I didn't remember this one so I searched it. From the title it would have made a 1 license plate requirement. Of all the laws that are enacted every year and all the great ones that are shot down, this is about the least important one I could think of. So why are you so upset it didn't get voted in? I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for this to get voted in anytime soon.
Wow, so I guess my opinions should only reflect that of yours? Just because it's not that important to you doesn't mean it may not be important to others. Did I say it was life or death? No. Will I still sleep well if it never gets signed into law? Yes. It's merely something I'd like to see become a law.

Lighten up Francis.
Old 08-12-2009, 04:10 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Texas Heat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Hood, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SB 589 is bullshit, why should I have to put a sticker on my window saying my tint is legal? Which by the way my tint is legal, so it's not like Im crying cause my **** is out of code. I just dont think it is right to make us put all these damn stickers on our cars.
Old 08-12-2009, 04:16 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I was under the impression that stickers added HP...
Old 08-12-2009, 04:51 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue's_Z28
I was under the impression that stickers added HP...
those are a different kind of sticker..... Fyi the window tint tickit is like 180 bucks and in texas the state troopers are really the only ones that'll get you for it.

Trooper: Looks like your window tint is to dark, legal is 25%
Me: ok
Trooper: (puts a meter on the window) well your tint is 2%, did you know thats too dark?
Me: Nope
Old 08-12-2009, 05:12 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
02ws666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CarsandWomen
those are a different kind of sticker..... Fyi the window tint tickit is like 180 bucks and in texas the state troopers are really the only ones that'll get you for it.

Trooper: Looks like your window tint is to dark, legal is 25%
Me: ok
Trooper: (puts a meter on the window) well your tint is 2%, did you know thats too dark?
Me: Nope
ROFL i almost fell outa my seat at work... thats exactly how id react.. now with a ******* 1000$ fine.. i personaly think that is fuckign rediculus
Old 08-12-2009, 05:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1nterceptor
This is some serious BS. I don't know of a single hospital that doesn't give you a child seat when your kid is born, so no one should be without a seat and we shouldn't have to pay for it if they are.

I don't know anyone who has received a child's seat from a hospital at the time of their child's birth.
Old 08-12-2009, 09:49 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
LS1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere down in Texas
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blue's_Z28
Wow, so I guess my opinions should only reflect that of yours? Just because it's not that important to you doesn't mean it may not be important to others. Did I say it was life or death? No. Will I still sleep well if it never gets signed into law? Yes. It's merely something I'd like to see become a law.

Lighten up Francis.
Why would you think I need to lighten up? Where did you get the idea that you had to think along the same lines as me? All I did was ask a question. You're the one who is perturbed by that bill, not me. Take your own advise and lighten up. And stop reading so much into innocuous statements.

Originally Posted by -Ross-
I don't know anyone who has received a child's seat from a hospital at the time of their child's birth.
We're 2 for 2(about to be 3 for 3). My best friend is 2 for 2. And Among all of my friends they're all batting 1.000, something like 20 for 20. Most hospitals, so far all that me and my friends have used, give parents at least a rear facing infant seat that are good for a minimum of 1 year. And if they don't, too bad, the government shouldn't be responsible for giving anyone a handout. State money shouldn't be going to garbage like this. If you can afford a car in the first place and fuel for it, then you can afford to save up a couple of dollars over the course of 9 months to buy a seat to save your child's life.
Old 08-12-2009, 10:06 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How many things can TX cut its budget in half with?? License plates are literally one of those things.

I thought it was the law to have the legal tint sticker on the car already?

The law also creates a new court cost for conviction of an offense under this section to be collected and used by TxDOT to buy safety seats for low income families.
I think its saying that if you get convicted of not having a seat than you'll have to pay an extra court fee to help fund the program.
Old 08-12-2009, 11:23 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1nterceptor
Why would you think I need to lighten up? Where did you get the idea that you had to think along the same lines as me? All I did was ask a question. You're the one who is perturbed by that bill, not me. Take your own advise and lighten up. And stop reading so much into innocuous statements.
Originally Posted by LS1nterceptor
I don't know half of the bills and I didn't remember this one so I searched it. From the title it would have made a 1 license plate requirement. Of all the laws that are enacted every year and all the great ones that are shot down, this is about the least important one I could think of. So why are you so upset it didn't get voted in? I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for this to get voted in anytime soon.
Well, gee Francis, I can't imagine WHERE I got that idea from.
Old 08-12-2009, 11:31 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (38)
 
Super-Bat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No updates on placement of the front license plate cover?
Old 08-12-2009, 11:44 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
ZexGX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: under a JEGS hat
Posts: 2,793
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

SB589 is particularly lame. If I ever consider moving to Texas, dissuade me.
Old 08-13-2009, 07:29 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
SneakySSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZexGX
SB589 is particularly lame. If I ever consider moving to Texas, dissuade me.
Okay buddy, you keep living in your gay-*** communistic excuse for a state. Im pretty sure we dont want you here in Texas with that mindset.
Old 08-13-2009, 07:44 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1nterceptor
We're 2 for 2(about to be 3 for 3). My best friend is 2 for 2. And Among all of my friends they're all batting 1.000, something like 20 for 20. Most hospitals, so far all that me and my friends have used, give parents at least a rear facing infant seat that are good for a minimum of 1 year. And if they don't, too bad, the government shouldn't be responsible for giving anyone a handout. State money shouldn't be going to garbage like this. If you can afford a car in the first place and fuel for it, then you can afford to save up a couple of dollars over the course of 9 months to buy a seat to save your child's life.
Maybe you and your friends somehow "qualified" for these seats? Or, maybe you all went to the same hospital which uses it as a "sales pitch"?
"Come spend a few grand at (insert name of hospital here) and we'll give you a free child safety seat valued at $16."
Old 08-13-2009, 08:31 AM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
SlvrFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZexGX
SB589 is particularly lame. If I ever consider moving to Texas, dissuade me.
Yes because CARB laws are so much better
Old 08-13-2009, 08:42 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZexGX
SB589 is particularly lame. If I ever consider moving to Texas, dissuade me.
Legal in California = 70%

Legal in Texas = 25%

Texas > California



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.