G-FORCE 2009 C6 w 416cid LS3! Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 12:32 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
 
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's all about what you see I guess.

As of now, no one in a 5th gen Camaro has really went fast with a bigger ci motor. Sure LMR went a 9.96 and ARD went a 10.26, one has a 427 and the other has a 468. You gotta see where I'm going with this.

I'd buy one if I knew it would run faster.
Old 01-28-2010, 12:34 PM
  #22  
8 Sec Tuner
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike TexaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII


I'd buy one if I knew it would run faster.
Looks like you need to place an order!


Old 01-28-2010, 12:46 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Worm Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very nice Mike!
Old 01-28-2010, 01:18 PM
  #24  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
sandovalt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sanleon, TX
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Looks like InvisibleZ is gonna have to step his 346 and dope c5 up to keep up w u now.
Old 01-28-2010, 01:23 PM
  #25  
Destroyer of Exotics
iTrader: (18)
 
FlashWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston tx
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
It's all about what you see I guess.

As of now, no one in a 5th gen Camaro has really went fast with a bigger ci motor. Sure LMR went a 9.96 and ARD went a 10.26, one has a 427 and the other has a 468. You gotta see where I'm going with this.

I'd buy one if I knew it would run faster.
well if thats the case no one shouldve gone any kind of stroker motor's with the ls1's since some have gone 9's cam only right

owners seems to be pleased with the car, although for some reason he said it just gets sidewayz in 1st and 2nd and 3rd wonder what would cause that
Old 01-28-2010, 02:30 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
 
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike TexaSS
Looks like you need to place an order!
[/IMG]
Now I see where the power under the curve is. I was looking at peak power. My car makes 538 492 heads/cam. How much of a gain would I see going to a 416 ci motor using my same cam and heads?
Old 01-28-2010, 02:35 PM
  #27  
8 Sec Tuner
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike TexaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
Now I see where the power under the curve is. I was looking at peak power. My car makes 538 492 heads/cam. How much of a gain would I see going to a 416 ci motor using my same cam and heads?
Id expect at least 30 rwhp and 40-50 ft lbs of tq.
Old 01-28-2010, 02:45 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
6.0monsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Keller, Tx
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
It's all about what you see I guess.

As of now, no one in a 5th gen Camaro has really went fast with a bigger ci motor. Sure LMR went a 9.96 and ARD went a 10.26, one has a 427 and the other has a 468. You gotta see where I'm going with this.

I'd buy one if I knew it would run faster.
Given the same car/specs etc with the addition of cubes it's pretty much mathmatically impossible for the car to not be faster.
Old 01-28-2010, 04:17 PM
  #29  
Formerly 4mulaJoe
iTrader: (11)
 
LS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: hou
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 6.0monsta
Given the same car/specs etc with the addition of cubes it's pretty much mathematically impossible for the car to not be faster.
Yup...
Old 01-28-2010, 06:17 PM
  #30  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
ex-SS-ve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sandovalt1
Looks like InvisibleZ is gonna have to step his 346 and dope c5 up to keep up w u now.
ill have to come over there and crack that *** if that happens!!
Old 01-28-2010, 09:53 PM
  #31  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
It's all about what you see I guess.

As of now, no one in a 5th gen Camaro has really went fast with a bigger ci motor. Sure LMR went a 9.96 and ARD went a 10.26, one has a 427 and the other has a 468. You gotta see where I'm going with this.

I'd buy one if I knew it would run faster.
E.T. is typically more of an indication of how well the suspension is setup. More power usually results in a faster car, as in MPH.

Why are you so critical of other 5th gen owners who run faster than you?
Old 01-29-2010, 08:23 AM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
 
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What did I say that was critical? I said they had bigger motor's, I didnt cry about it. Is this not ok to state the obvious?
With E.T come's mph, me personaly, thats what I'm worried about.

I am looking froward to racing David Brooks this spring, he's a super nice guy.
Old 01-29-2010, 09:31 AM
  #33  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
What did I say that was critical? I said they had bigger motor's, I didnt cry about it. Is this not ok to state the obvious?
It's perfectly fine to state the obvious, but your statements all seem to have an underlying theme to them, critical of the larger displacement 5th Gens, and it was most obvious in the previous threads that got locked/deleted. It doesn't sound like you've let that go yet, either.

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
With E.T come's mph, me personaly, thats what I'm worried about.
Not necessarily. Haven't you ever seen a Top Fuel car blow up mid track? If MPH comes with low E.T.'s, then why is it that they'll run a 9.xx at 80 MPH? Why did TSP's SBE car go slower in MPH, with their fastest E.T.?

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
I am looking froward to racing David Brooks this spring, he's a super nice guy.
Good luck to you, that should be a good event.
Old 01-29-2010, 10:14 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The threads that have been locked are not because any of the statements I have made, other's who agree or disagree with them have caused them to be locked or deleted.

Were not talking about blowing engines up and rolling through the traps here, we're talking about bigger ci. I said that I could see where the bigger ci shortblock made power under the curve when he posted the graph. I used the 5th gen cars as an example, I was not bashing them. End of story.
Old 01-29-2010, 10:11 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
 
U LUZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Alvin Texas
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bash
Oh ****! Dannys car is gonna be sick!! Nice Job!
man i really like the way both of your cars look .....
Old 01-29-2010, 10:23 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
 
U LUZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Alvin Texas
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
It made less rwhp and 11 more tq then my stock ci shortblock. I do have heads, but their cheaper then a stroker kit.
spray a 300 shot on your motor and then pick all the pieces up and try to build another one...its not cheaper.. and you cant compare stock rods pistons or crank to better built higher quality pieces they are going to weigh more ...making a little less horse power but will take a brutal beating. and if he ports these heads he will make 45-55 more rwhp.
Old 01-31-2010, 11:38 AM
  #37  
HTX
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
HTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i would love just for the Stock LS3 power in my fbody.

For my car (beeing as it weighs less) i would benefit more for me just to get a topend setup rather than a strocker kit. Only because i know i wouldnt get traction with the LS3's tq.... so more torque would do me no favors....

then again... I own an Fbody.... Not a badass vette
Old 02-01-2010, 08:06 AM
  #38  
8 Sec Tuner
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike TexaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HTX
i would love just for the Stock LS3 power in my fbody.

For my car (beeing as it weighs less) i would benefit more for me just to get a topend setup rather than a strocker kit. Only because i know i wouldnt get traction with the LS3's tq.... so more torque would do me no favors....

then again... I own an Fbody.... Not a badass vette

We do Ls3 swaps all the time.
Old 02-01-2010, 08:35 AM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (45)
 
INVISIBLEZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sandovalt1
Looks like InvisibleZ is gonna have to step his 346 and dope c5 up to keep up w u now.
Danny would not stand a chance from a dig, I don't care how much power he puts down. Very impressive numbers no doubt. The car looks sick!!

Originally Posted by ex-SS-ve
ill have to come over there and crack that *** if that happens!!
Come on over, I love to crack confident people's ***, lmao!!!
Old 02-02-2010, 08:14 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
THE_302_KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default i cracked ur azz already in my lil blue coupe 5.0

nastyc5 called me out on a wednesday night while i was at home watching tv. we did a 20 roll and a dig spray on spray tore dat ace up lol . had lots of spectators too. an on video. what it feel like to get beat by a kid 3 times in your life time with three diff cars ? maybe u should buy dannys ls3 vette to beat me lmao. yea i know ur gonna wanna run again , trust me my car comes out like a ****** on crack !


Quick Reply: G-FORCE 2009 C6 w 416cid LS3! Dyno Results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.