looking to purchase a handgun...
#41
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I prefer 9mm, 115gr, $9 a box, goes bang every time and my Taurus PT92 holds 17+1 of it. If that's not enough, my backup Kel-Tec P11 hides in a pocket and holds 10+1
Drugged up crazy or horse, you aren't going to survive 29rds of 9mm.
http://port47.ath.cx/misc/guns/pt92ss/pt92_6.jpg
Fits the hand well, full size, reliable beyond belief, tac rail for light/laser/etc, very accurate. Only draw back is, like those have said, the grip is thick, other than that, it's no bigger than a 1911. Besides I'm a medium size dude at 5'10" and 180lbs, if it fits my hand none of you 6'7" guys get to complain
![Punch](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_punch.gif)
Oh and it also has the original Beretta frame mounted safety and will take Beretta parts, aside from the few Taurus modified.
#42
TECH Apprentice
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was actually HORSES they were worried about dropping. Stop the horse, stop the charge. .45 is a good round obviously, but expensive, and scarce around here.
I prefer 9mm, 115gr, $9 a box, goes bang every time and my Taurus PT92 holds 17+1 of it. If that's not enough, my backup Kel-Tec P11 hides in a pocket and holds 10+1
Drugged up crazy or horse, you aren't going to survive 29rds of 9mm.
http://port47.ath.cx/misc/guns/pt92ss/pt92_6.jpg
Fits the hand well, full size, reliable beyond belief, tac rail for light/laser/etc, very accurate. Only draw back is, like those have said, the grip is thick, other than that, it's no bigger than a 1911. Besides I'm a medium size dude at 5'10" and 180lbs, if it fits my hand none of you 6'7" guys get to complain![Punch](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_punch.gif)
I prefer 9mm, 115gr, $9 a box, goes bang every time and my Taurus PT92 holds 17+1 of it. If that's not enough, my backup Kel-Tec P11 hides in a pocket and holds 10+1
Drugged up crazy or horse, you aren't going to survive 29rds of 9mm.
http://port47.ath.cx/misc/guns/pt92ss/pt92_6.jpg
Fits the hand well, full size, reliable beyond belief, tac rail for light/laser/etc, very accurate. Only draw back is, like those have said, the grip is thick, other than that, it's no bigger than a 1911. Besides I'm a medium size dude at 5'10" and 180lbs, if it fits my hand none of you 6'7" guys get to complain
![Punch](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_punch.gif)
Though the 45 ammo is getting hard to find. Academy never has it. Also, it is a regional thing. I had friend drive through Georgia and they seem to have plenty of it out there...
#44
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lighter (14oz unloaded) and easier (DAO) to put into action that a Walther PPK, also uses standard 9mm. Very small.
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1...1/DSCF0358.jpg
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1...1/DSCF0358.jpg
#45
TECH Addict
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was actually HORSES they were worried about dropping. Stop the horse, stop the charge. .45 is a good round obviously, but expensive, and scarce around here.
I prefer 9mm, 115gr, $9 a box, goes bang every time and my Taurus PT92 holds 17+1 of it. If that's not enough, my backup Kel-Tec P11 hides in a pocket and holds 10+1
Drugged up crazy or horse, you aren't going to survive 29rds of 9mm.
I prefer 9mm, 115gr, $9 a box, goes bang every time and my Taurus PT92 holds 17+1 of it. If that's not enough, my backup Kel-Tec P11 hides in a pocket and holds 10+1
Drugged up crazy or horse, you aren't going to survive 29rds of 9mm.
9mm is the best pistol range caliber ever. also good for the military, police and gang bangers. all for the same reason, its cheap and easy to stuff a bagillion rounds in one magazine. one other reason why its also good for these uses...if you can't hit **** with a pistol you'll have a bagillion 2nd chances.
look up the ballistics on 9mm ammo. especially hollow point 9mm fired through layers of clothing into a ballistics gel block. or fired through a layer of auto glass, or heavy winter clothing, or thin sheet metal, or dry wall etc etc etc. the only thing 9mm is good for is penetrating bare flesh. and even then it doesn't have the diameter that other rounds do to deliver a good enough shock through the soft tissue.
but i mean i have no idea what i'm talking about. so it's ok keep shooting 9mm.
#46
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was indeed .45 ACP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.45_ACP
Thompson insisted on a real "man stopper" pistol, following the poor showing of the Army's .38 Long Colt pistols during the Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902).
.45 colt was the predecessor and huge influence in consideration concerning bullet size and weight. This is why they remained with the "minimum" acceptable cartridge being a .45 cal. of course it was updated for the new semi-auto design.
Thompson insisted on a real "man stopper" pistol, following the poor showing of the Army's .38 Long Colt pistols during the Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902).
.45 colt was the predecessor and huge influence in consideration concerning bullet size and weight. This is why they remained with the "minimum" acceptable cartridge being a .45 cal. of course it was updated for the new semi-auto design.
#47
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
9mm is also an efficient round regardless of what people say. You do know that .357 is 9mm right? And if I'm not mistaken it has quite the reputations for stopping fights. There are also many hot loadings of +p 9mm that equals or eclipses .357 magnum.
Expansion is also the job of round design and composition, not diameter. 308 certainly stops a bad guy a lot better than 9mm, but it's smaller in diameter. .223 has been around for decades, and is one of the most popular long gun rounds in the world. It's just a .22 at 45-72gr....(they also over-penetrate with the majority being solid FMJ)
Bigger is better, but in a world where not every man, and woman has the strength of Hollywood Arnold, there are considerations and compromises to be made. 45 ACP is a great round, but costly, and is too much for some to handle.
There was also a time for me that I swore I'd never defend 9mm, but it's not a simple "bigger is better" scenario.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/
http://www.theboxotruth.com/
Anyway, back to the OP - Pick:
What you can best handle
Afford to shot the most of
Are most accurate with
Something with a realistic magazine size
Something that will not over-penetrate (.44 mag need not apply)
Something simple and easy to employ
Expansion is also the job of round design and composition, not diameter. 308 certainly stops a bad guy a lot better than 9mm, but it's smaller in diameter. .223 has been around for decades, and is one of the most popular long gun rounds in the world. It's just a .22 at 45-72gr....(they also over-penetrate with the majority being solid FMJ)
Bigger is better, but in a world where not every man, and woman has the strength of Hollywood Arnold, there are considerations and compromises to be made. 45 ACP is a great round, but costly, and is too much for some to handle.
There was also a time for me that I swore I'd never defend 9mm, but it's not a simple "bigger is better" scenario.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/
http://www.theboxotruth.com/
Anyway, back to the OP - Pick:
What you can best handle
Afford to shot the most of
Are most accurate with
Something with a realistic magazine size
Something that will not over-penetrate (.44 mag need not apply)
Something simple and easy to employ
Last edited by $750 L98; 05-26-2010 at 04:28 PM.
#49
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
LOL I love it. I personally would have liked 10mm to become more popular than it is, but the FBI complained about over-penetration and apparently some of their lesser counterparts couldn't control recoil well. So they shortened the case, called it .40 S&W and bam, that's what we have now.
Now a Dan Wesson Razorback in 10mm would still be a very sweet piece.
Now a Dan Wesson Razorback in 10mm would still be a very sweet piece.
#50
TECH Addict
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was indeed .45 ACP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.45_ACP
Thompson insisted on a real "man stopper" pistol, following the poor showing of the Army's .38 Long Colt pistols during the Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902).
.45 colt was the predecessor and huge influence in consideration concerning bullet size and weight. This is why they remained with the "minimum" acceptable cartridge being a .45 cal. of course it was updated for the new semi-auto design.
Thompson insisted on a real "man stopper" pistol, following the poor showing of the Army's .38 Long Colt pistols during the Philippine Insurrection (1899-1902).
.45 colt was the predecessor and huge influence in consideration concerning bullet size and weight. This is why they remained with the "minimum" acceptable cartridge being a .45 cal. of course it was updated for the new semi-auto design.
9mm is also an efficient round regardless of what people say. You do know that .357 is 9mm right? And if I'm not mistaken it has quite the reputations for stopping fights. There are also many hot loadings of +p 9mm that equals or eclipses .357 magnum.
Expansion is also the job of round design and composition, not diameter. 308 certainly stops a bad guy a lot better than 9mm, but it's smaller in diameter. .223 has been around for decades, and is one of the most popular long gun rounds in the world. It's just a .22 at 45-72gr....(they also over-penetrate with the majority being solid FMJ)
Bigger is better, but in a world where not every man, and woman has the strength of Hollywood Arnold, there are considerations and compromises to be made. 45 ACP is a great round, but costly, and is too much for some to handle.
There was also a time for me that I swore I'd never defend 9mm, but it's not a simple "bigger is better" scenario.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/
http://www.theboxotruth.com/
Anyway, back to the OP - Pick:
What you can best handle
Afford to shot the most of
Are most accurate with
Something with a realistic magazine size
Something that will not over-penetrate (.44 mag need not apply)
Something simple and easy to employ
Expansion is also the job of round design and composition, not diameter. 308 certainly stops a bad guy a lot better than 9mm, but it's smaller in diameter. .223 has been around for decades, and is one of the most popular long gun rounds in the world. It's just a .22 at 45-72gr....(they also over-penetrate with the majority being solid FMJ)
Bigger is better, but in a world where not every man, and woman has the strength of Hollywood Arnold, there are considerations and compromises to be made. 45 ACP is a great round, but costly, and is too much for some to handle.
There was also a time for me that I swore I'd never defend 9mm, but it's not a simple "bigger is better" scenario.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/
http://www.theboxotruth.com/
Anyway, back to the OP - Pick:
What you can best handle
Afford to shot the most of
Are most accurate with
Something with a realistic magazine size
Something that will not over-penetrate (.44 mag need not apply)
Something simple and easy to employ
btw i am 125lbs, i am a marine, and damn it i am tired of ppl saying the the .45 is too big. maybe for a 90lb girl but thats about it. you don't have to be arnold to properly shoot a .45 or hell even a .44 or .50. ive shot all 3. they aren't that bad....srsly. and **** if i can shoulder and fire an m240, i think most average ppl out there that are bigger than me can handle a .45
also OP already picked his weapons...a .380 and .45 which are both much better rounds than the 9mm IMO.
#51
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To each their own, but there is a reason other than personal opinion that the 9mm is the most widely used round in pistols. 9mm ballistics are superior to both .380 ACP and .38 special. Both of those have an upper end energy of ~200ft/lbs, 9mm starts at ~300ft/lb and moves up to ~600 ft/lb - that's a big difference in kinetic energy.
.357/357 sig are very similar, and again I made the point that 9mm has a lot of overlap with these two in terms of effectiveness and available ammunition. Is 357 better? Yes it's been proven since what, the 1930-40's, and it's still going strong, I have two DW large frame revolvers chambered for .357 Mag - but it's hard to find at times. Still my favorite round in terms of balance and effectiveness.
I didn't post my replies to start ****, so don't take it personally. However my opinion, and the research done by many remains - 9mm is an effective round. Maybe not in the Beretta, I know there is also a reason you aren't a SEAL until you've tasted Italian steel. Now if you are blaming the jamming issues with the M9, that isn't the M9, that's the magazine. They added some special "coating" to protect them from the sand, but ended up screwing you guys and causing lots of jams. They should have stuck with Mec-gar.
Just because you and I can shoot hot hunting loads out of a .44 Mag doesn't mean everyone else can. That was my favorite gun when I was 18, 240gr @ 1500fps were what I shot standard out of a light weight med. frame snub. I could hit the target pretty well with that thing, but follow up shots in quick succession were tricky, recoil was less than optimal, ammo was expensive, and ballistics dictated that it would have severe travel through issues.
I also believe I already said .45 is a good round, it was my first semi-auto caliber. Again, it was expensive, large, heavy, and had recoil more significant than most 9mm. I also didn't say it was too big, but that it is hard to handle for some people - Don't ask me why, I like shooting it. But again, recoil, follow up shots, and over all effectiveness of the individual with the weapon is what lead the military, police forces, and a large amount of private citizens to choose 9mm.
In Texas however it is still much harder to find 45 acp and that's just a fact, and partially what drove me to buy a 9mm firearm. I also don't know of any 45 acp that allows me to carry cocked/locked with 17+1. Unless of course you contract STI to build you a nice custom double stack 2011.
Right now, considering what I've been paying for 9mm, 4 boxes of 9mm = 1 box of .45 ACP. I can certainly afford to practice more with 9mm lol
What makes you say 380 acp is better than 9mm though? They certainly make some small firearms in that caliber, my kel-tec P11 however weighs less than a walther PPK and holds 10+1, 12+1, or 14+1 in a flush fit mag. On the ballistic side 380 acp doesn't come close to 9mm.
The M240 can't be that bad of a kicker either, those were pretty hefty last I remember (~30lbs). Now the Saiga 12 I have on the other hand, at 7lb dry, my brother hated it. He didn't like shooting 1oz 3" Mag slugs out of it, and he had nearly 50lb on me. I still get ~1" groups at 25yds with no choke and cheap slugs. I'd still like to see the military make good with some AA-12s or S-12s, those things are wicked for urban combat. But long guns are a totally different story.
.357/357 sig are very similar, and again I made the point that 9mm has a lot of overlap with these two in terms of effectiveness and available ammunition. Is 357 better? Yes it's been proven since what, the 1930-40's, and it's still going strong, I have two DW large frame revolvers chambered for .357 Mag - but it's hard to find at times. Still my favorite round in terms of balance and effectiveness.
I didn't post my replies to start ****, so don't take it personally. However my opinion, and the research done by many remains - 9mm is an effective round. Maybe not in the Beretta, I know there is also a reason you aren't a SEAL until you've tasted Italian steel. Now if you are blaming the jamming issues with the M9, that isn't the M9, that's the magazine. They added some special "coating" to protect them from the sand, but ended up screwing you guys and causing lots of jams. They should have stuck with Mec-gar.
Just because you and I can shoot hot hunting loads out of a .44 Mag doesn't mean everyone else can. That was my favorite gun when I was 18, 240gr @ 1500fps were what I shot standard out of a light weight med. frame snub. I could hit the target pretty well with that thing, but follow up shots in quick succession were tricky, recoil was less than optimal, ammo was expensive, and ballistics dictated that it would have severe travel through issues.
I also believe I already said .45 is a good round, it was my first semi-auto caliber. Again, it was expensive, large, heavy, and had recoil more significant than most 9mm. I also didn't say it was too big, but that it is hard to handle for some people - Don't ask me why, I like shooting it. But again, recoil, follow up shots, and over all effectiveness of the individual with the weapon is what lead the military, police forces, and a large amount of private citizens to choose 9mm.
In Texas however it is still much harder to find 45 acp and that's just a fact, and partially what drove me to buy a 9mm firearm. I also don't know of any 45 acp that allows me to carry cocked/locked with 17+1. Unless of course you contract STI to build you a nice custom double stack 2011.
Right now, considering what I've been paying for 9mm, 4 boxes of 9mm = 1 box of .45 ACP. I can certainly afford to practice more with 9mm lol
What makes you say 380 acp is better than 9mm though? They certainly make some small firearms in that caliber, my kel-tec P11 however weighs less than a walther PPK and holds 10+1, 12+1, or 14+1 in a flush fit mag. On the ballistic side 380 acp doesn't come close to 9mm.
The M240 can't be that bad of a kicker either, those were pretty hefty last I remember (~30lbs). Now the Saiga 12 I have on the other hand, at 7lb dry, my brother hated it. He didn't like shooting 1oz 3" Mag slugs out of it, and he had nearly 50lb on me. I still get ~1" groups at 25yds with no choke and cheap slugs. I'd still like to see the military make good with some AA-12s or S-12s, those things are wicked for urban combat. But long guns are a totally different story.
Last edited by $750 L98; 05-26-2010 at 11:16 PM.
#52
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i own numerous weapons(check out my pix) and as far as handguns go, if you have big hands/long fingers, beretta 92fs (italian version only) if you have "average size" hands and want more concealable glock 19 is best bang for the buck, good size, 9mm with the right ammo will get the job done and less maintenance than a beretta...think of a beretta as a "cadillac" and a glock as a chevy, same thing, different label/price but you can never go wrong with a 1911, then again, everyone has there own taste and preference, pm me if you got a specific question
#57
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
some of you guys are talking **** about guys who cant handle the recoil of 45... If you were REALLY talented with a pistol, you wouldnt NEED anything more than a 22 for self defense...
Unless of course you want to be able to take down your enemy through a wall, ir car door, or apparently on the other side of a horse. Which is why i own a XD9mm and glock 27 .40
I just wanted to defend the small caliber guys
Unless of course you want to be able to take down your enemy through a wall, ir car door, or apparently on the other side of a horse. Which is why i own a XD9mm and glock 27 .40
I just wanted to defend the small caliber guys
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#58
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i wasn't sure where to put this...
i'm looking to buy a handgun, for most of the right reasons, and i'm needing an opinion or two...
the main ones i'm looking at are
Beretta PX4 Storm .45ACP
Beretta m92FS
does anyone know anything about these? the storm seems to have gotten great reviews pretty much everywhere i look. if anyone has an opinion or can suggest a better handgun for a n00b to guns, please feel free to throw in your .02
i'm looking to buy a handgun, for most of the right reasons, and i'm needing an opinion or two...
the main ones i'm looking at are
Beretta PX4 Storm .45ACP
Beretta m92FS
does anyone know anything about these? the storm seems to have gotten great reviews pretty much everywhere i look. if anyone has an opinion or can suggest a better handgun for a n00b to guns, please feel free to throw in your .02
#60
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
some of you guys are talking **** about guys who cant handle the recoil of 45... If you were REALLY talented with a pistol, you wouldnt NEED anything more than a 22 for self defense...
Unless of course you want to be able to take down your enemy through a wall, ir car door, or apparently on the other side of a horse. Which is why i own a XD9mm and glock 27 .40
I just wanted to defend the small caliber guys![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Unless of course you want to be able to take down your enemy through a wall, ir car door, or apparently on the other side of a horse. Which is why i own a XD9mm and glock 27 .40
I just wanted to defend the small caliber guys
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Finally, rimfire cartridges are unreliable in general. Meaning that they are often prone to not going off due to light strikes. This varies by ammunition quality, the firearm in question and so on. .22LR based handguns are also not typically designed as defensive firearms either. They tend to have a larger target oriented configuration. There are some that fall into a more defensive category, but you get to combine a short sight radius, poor ergonomics, magazine feeding issues and other problems into a package that's hard to even argue as being better than nothing as it can give someone a false sense of security.
And before the ".22LR has killed more people than any other caliber" argument gets made, keep in mind that .22LR is the most popular cartridge in America. Not for self-defense, but in general. It's used for sport and target shooting because it's cheap. It's also been around longer than many other options have. .22LR rifles can be found in homes that don't even have firearms to speak of otherwise. Keep in mind firearm death statistics tend to lump suicides, accidental deaths due to negligent discharges, and even shootings involving law abiding citizens putting down intruders or others in concealed carry situations in the same pile. Yes, .22LR has probably killed more than any other caliber, but it's effectiveness and track record for lethality isn't really all that good.
As far as recoil goes, one of the many reasons why people opt for 9mm over .45ACP is the smaller size of the handguns and additional capacity. It isn't necessarily because of recoil. While .45ACP does have more felt recoil than 9mm generally does, platform, ammunition choice and other factors probably play a bigger part in the decision to choose one caliber over another. I've worked in a gun store and rarely have I heard of people saying they wanted 9mm over .45ACP because of recoil. It's usually the bottom of their list of reasons for such a choice. Cheaper ammunition, capacity and smaller framed guns are usually the reason. In fact, there are often cases where people will take a smaller gun and give no thought to recoil because they believe it won't matter for the few shots they need should a situation arise where deadly force is warranted.
This is why you'll see people carrying far heavier loads in their defensive weapons than what they practice with. I have sold .357 Magnum airweight revolvers to people that wanted to carry .357 Magnum, but never practice with it. Instead, they shoot .38 Special, but put .357 Magnum in it for carry. They also don't believe they can miss at the distances where they would need it. In my experience, little weight or emphasis is placed on recoil when making caliber selections for concealed carry. Gun size is the number one thing people look for whether that's right or wrong.
I own the Beretts 92fs. I have average size handsand it's a real reach to get my index finger to sit at the right spot on the trigger. I shoots wonderfully. I added adjustable target sight and it's spot on. If you're considering concealed carry you definitely need smaller. Some people say concealed carry with a full size 1911 is fine. Personally I wouldn't want the bulkiness and weight. There are a couple higher capacity small compacts out now that are nice. I agree with an earlier response someone added. Go to a local range where they rent and try out a few. Good luck.
However, others would often opt not to carry rather than being burdened by some full sized gun be it polymer or alloy frame. A gun left at home is useless. So, those people opt for a more comfortable route and take a weapon with some drawbacks on the basis that they probably won't need it. Some simply value on characteristic or another when choosing a concealed carry weapon. I put less weight in the size of the gun when making my decision, but I'm a fairly large individual with fairly loose fitting clothes. If your a millenial wearing skinny jeans and a fedora, you probably won't want a full sized duty handgun like a Beretta 92FS at your side. Where as I'd rather carry that, then a SIG P365.
Last edited by Spamfritter; 03-05-2020 at 04:16 PM.