Bad Crash at LMP
#61
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (94)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Huffman, Texas
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#62
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Camp Lejeune, NC/ Sealy, TX
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seen the video, isn't good quality an all you can see is smoke. Being there in person was way crazier, especially when your sitting at the 1/8th. Go Pro footage would be the sh** to watch!
#63
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i knew it was only a matter of time till one of those A.R.D. hack jobs went into the wall glad the owner was ok but the guy from h-town camaros is a dumb *** me and rooster tried to warn these guys about A.R.D. and we got our posts deleted and banned from their web site so technically its partially his fault because he did everything in has power to cover up all the evidence we provided to them showing A.R.D. was a POS shop so no one would get screwed, well i guess it only took someone loosing their ******* car before the tards over on h town camaros will listen. WELL ARE YOU LISTENING NOW? A.R.D. SUCKS and always has.
#67
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
That engine was toast well before the 1/8th mile mark. Glad it didn't take out the Lightning and ruin two nice vehicles. Boosting engines with glass pistons is a risky proposition regardless of how well it's tuned. Getting greedy with boost & tune just makes the kabooms come earlier.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
#68
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
600-650rwhp is not really getting greedy with the LS3. I think ECS has 75 out there now over 700rwhp, and only 2 have popped. Their cars see a lot of track duty and some are full Mile run cars.
#69
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
ECS typically uses centrifugal blowers, which only make higher boost at high rpm. The Whipple pushing 600+ rwhp on a 100% stock L99 engine / auto trans = KABOOM waiting to happen. Keep in mind these blowers make full boost at 2K rpm. Different stress loading than a centrifugal blower creates. If you ran a 600 rwhp centri blower against a 600 rwhp roots/screw/tvs car, the centri gets walked.
#70
Formerly 4mulaJoe
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: hou
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Through an automatic? With stock internals (no cam, no spring upgrades, no ported heads, nothing done)
ECS typically uses centrifugal blowers, which only make higher boost at high rpm. The Whipple pushing 600+ rwhp on a 100% stock L99 engine / auto trans = KABOOM waiting to happen. Keep in mind these blowers make full boost at 2K rpm. Different stress loading than a centrifugal blower creates. If you ran a 600 rwhp centri blower against a 600 rwhp roots/screw/tvs car, the centri gets walked.
ECS typically uses centrifugal blowers, which only make higher boost at high rpm. The Whipple pushing 600+ rwhp on a 100% stock L99 engine / auto trans = KABOOM waiting to happen. Keep in mind these blowers make full boost at 2K rpm. Different stress loading than a centrifugal blower creates. If you ran a 600 rwhp centri blower against a 600 rwhp roots/screw/tvs car, the centri gets walked.
It is still in the tune. You make a good point, but it is a reason to be very conservative on timing down low on those whipple cars.
#71
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
Joe, if both setups have identical peak hp numbers, the PD blowers will typically have a broader powerband. For example, when I shift my Z06 at 7K rpm (619 rwhp) it is still making 600 rwhp at 6K rpm. The HP curve is flat all the way across my racing rpm band. On my Viper, the centri climbs a good 30-40 rwhp from start to finish in the racing powerband. Centri hp curves model more like an NA curve on the HP.
Also, you guys are comparing ECS Corvettes at nearly 800-900 lbs weight difference vs a 5th gen. That extra vehicle weight also puts more strain on an engine.
Also, you guys are comparing ECS Corvettes at nearly 800-900 lbs weight difference vs a 5th gen. That extra vehicle weight also puts more strain on an engine.
#72
Through an automatic? With stock internals (no cam, no spring upgrades, no ported heads, nothing done)
ECS typically uses centrifugal blowers, which only make higher boost at high rpm. The Whipple pushing 600+ rwhp on a 100% stock L99 engine / auto trans = KABOOM waiting to happen. Keep in mind these blowers make full boost at 2K rpm. Different stress loading than a centrifugal blower creates. If you ran a 600 rwhp centri blower against a 600 rwhp roots/screw/tvs car, the centri gets walked.
ECS typically uses centrifugal blowers, which only make higher boost at high rpm. The Whipple pushing 600+ rwhp on a 100% stock L99 engine / auto trans = KABOOM waiting to happen. Keep in mind these blowers make full boost at 2K rpm. Different stress loading than a centrifugal blower creates. If you ran a 600 rwhp centri blower against a 600 rwhp roots/screw/tvs car, the centri gets walked.
Looks like a cam swap to me.
And your statement on the postive displacement blowers .vs centri's is just RETARDED. CENTRI's for the win!
#73
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
Retarded? All else equal, equal cars, you are saying a 600 rwhp centri beats a 600 rwhp PD blower setup from a roll?
Please explain. Your logic defies physics. We aren't talking all-out max builds here, it was a statement comparing equal HP setups. Of course the centri dominates all-out racecar builds, except when the turbo(s) arrive.
Please explain. Your logic defies physics. We aren't talking all-out max builds here, it was a statement comparing equal HP setups. Of course the centri dominates all-out racecar builds, except when the turbo(s) arrive.
#74
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- First: Very glad the driver is OK! Think that is the main purpose of this thread. Not to bash LMP or other.....
- I've seen Underground cars crash, and I'm know even LS1-Tech Sponsors have shop/customer cars crash at tracks/blown motors/ext.....Did not see anyone bashing UG, or other before after those accidents. Unfortunately A.R.D. looks to be LS1-Tech's *** rag. I remember not too long ago it was Hennessey.
- It has nothing to do with the track. LMP has been building a solid rep for track prep and hooking. Many longtime drag racers that have had the same cars at other tracks, and have had new personal record times at LMP. 9 times out of 10 it's the drivers fault. Still take that on a case by case basis. I've snapped 3 shafts the last 3 times I've been to LMP. Between driver error and the track dead hooking snap-ola. It's not the tracks fault. It's mine.
- If you were not there, you don't have **** to say.
- Very happy the driver walked away, and wish him all the best on getting this worked out. Please keep us posted on his status. Best wishes on a speedy recovery.
- Stay on topic!
- That is all.
- I've seen Underground cars crash, and I'm know even LS1-Tech Sponsors have shop/customer cars crash at tracks/blown motors/ext.....Did not see anyone bashing UG, or other before after those accidents. Unfortunately A.R.D. looks to be LS1-Tech's *** rag. I remember not too long ago it was Hennessey.
- It has nothing to do with the track. LMP has been building a solid rep for track prep and hooking. Many longtime drag racers that have had the same cars at other tracks, and have had new personal record times at LMP. 9 times out of 10 it's the drivers fault. Still take that on a case by case basis. I've snapped 3 shafts the last 3 times I've been to LMP. Between driver error and the track dead hooking snap-ola. It's not the tracks fault. It's mine.
- If you were not there, you don't have **** to say.
- Very happy the driver walked away, and wish him all the best on getting this worked out. Please keep us posted on his status. Best wishes on a speedy recovery.
- Stay on topic!
- That is all.
#75
Formerly 4mulaJoe
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: hou
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Retarded? All else equal, equal cars, you are saying a 600 rwhp centri beats a 600 rwhp PD blower setup from a roll?
Please explain. Your logic defies physics. We aren't talking all-out max builds here, it was a statement comparing equal HP setups. Of course the centri dominates all-out racecar builds, except when the turbo(s) arrive.
Please explain. Your logic defies physics. We aren't talking all-out max builds here, it was a statement comparing equal HP setups. Of course the centri dominates all-out racecar builds, except when the turbo(s) arrive.
It just doesn't play out the way you are saying.
#77
In theory your idea may work out but a PD blower ripping through the gears is bound to get heatsoak and lose power. I think where the centris really accel is the ability to easily inject meth and have a much better capacity to cool the compressed air. You may need a 650rwhp dyno PD to equal a 600rwhp in real world conditions. That PD may be only making 600rwhp in a roll race.
#78
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Camp Lejeune, NC/ Sealy, TX
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think the track hooks fine, there weren't a lot of traction issues Saturday night except for the nitro bike and the street class cars. And that old mustang which was a suspension issue on the car. The bump iS there, I'll look at some
Of my videos and I know in person you can see a car go over the bump might have video proof though for those who are saying the track is perfect.
Of my videos and I know in person you can see a car go over the bump might have video proof though for those who are saying the track is perfect.
#79
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texarkana,TX
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I couldnt figure out how to link it and it show up in the post directly but heres a good link to PD vs Cent between my buddys 2 cars. C6 made 760rwhp & GT500 809rwhp.Both 6spd both from a roll just for the debate http://youtu.be/qhvjTvUnzp8
#80
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I couldnt figure out how to link it and it show up in the post directly but heres a good link to PD vs Cent between my buddys 2 cars. C6 made 760rwhp & GT500 809rwhp.Both 6spd both from a roll just for the debate http://youtu.be/qhvjTvUnzp8