The "FIRST" Twin Turbo Lamborghi Aventador just rolled off the assembly line

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 06:09 PM
  #21  
Teching In
 
MulletGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chasgiv3
Eh nice car but I'm not sure why you folks are that impressed. 0-60 in 2.2 isn't that fast at all.

Not that I'm comparing a dragster but just trying to clear up the nut who thought it was as fast as one. Dragster does 0-100MPH in .08 Seconds. THAT would wake my *** up!
0-100 in .08 seconds? Nope

Top Fuelers go from 0-60 in 0.84 seconds and cover the quarter mile in about 4.5 seconds.

Last edited by MulletGT; 06-07-2012 at 06:18 PM.
Old 06-07-2012, 06:19 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chasgiv3
Eh nice car but I'm not sure why you folks are that impressed. 0-60 in 2.2 isn't that fast at all.

Not that I'm comparing a dragster but just trying to clear up the nut who thought it was as fast as one. Dragster does 0-100MPH in .08 Seconds. THAT would wake my *** up!
There will always be haters that can't afford one that will hate.
Old 06-07-2012, 06:33 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

7 minute A-Ubs.
Old 06-07-2012, 07:23 PM
  #24  
LS7 Member
 
UTzo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Pfttt, not impressed... I would totally rather have a 1000 hp tt 10+ year old fbody than that euro trash.
Old 06-08-2012, 02:12 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
NVR4GET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HTOWN
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chasgiv3
Eh nice car but I'm not sure why you folks are that impressed. 0-60 in 2.2 isn't that fast at all.

Not that I'm comparing a dragster but just trying to clear up the nut who thought it was as fast as one. Dragster does 0-100MPH in .08 Seconds. THAT would wake my *** up!
You put 20" street tires (not drag radial) on your car and go down the street and beat that? This is a full weight car on street tires not drag radial on a public road not a prepped drag strip.
Old 06-08-2012, 02:18 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Arent the R level TT gallardos making well over 1500+ whp and quicker? And lighter? Whats the range of power on the V12's?
Old 06-08-2012, 02:32 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Turbo_Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: League City,Tx
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
Whats the range of power on the V12's?
Their Website says:
HP:????????
TRQ:??????
Old 06-08-2012, 02:46 PM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
Arent the R level TT gallardos making well over 1500+ whp and quicker? And lighter?
Yeah, but their doors open all wrong.
Old 06-08-2012, 03:00 PM
  #29  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Mr Powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Friendswood
Posts: 10,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think this maybe UGR's "new platform" to compete against the GTR for 1/4 mile racing. I think it's going to be getting it done.
Old 06-08-2012, 03:16 PM
  #30  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MulletGT
0-100 in .08 seconds? Nope
oops......
Yes .8 seconds.....LOL screwed up the decimal point.

I'm not a hater of the car. I like it. I'd have to sell my 2nd home in order to afford one that's true.
Old 06-08-2012, 03:24 PM
  #31  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NVR4GET
You put 20" street tires (not drag radial) on your car and go down the street and beat that? This is a full weight car on street tires not drag radial on a public road not a prepped drag strip.
If I mini-tubbed the car I might. Not sure why I'd hamper myself with 20" street tires though. I guess if I was looking to do flying mile I'd change some things up. Definitely lots of advantages to AWD. Some of these new trannies are really holding up like the GTR's and Lambo's to the big power. I've spent about 70K over the last 10 years on my turd. Should've saved my pennies I guess instead.
Old 06-08-2012, 08:30 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
 
| Powered by Satan |'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston / University of Texas, Austin
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the point he was making clearly went over your head, lol.
Old 06-08-2012, 10:20 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
3.4camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chasgiv3
oops......
Yes .8 seconds.....LOL screwed up the decimal point.
The .08 seconds made me pull out the calculator. 100mph velocity change in .08 seconds is approx. 57g's of force. Death, lol.
Old 06-08-2012, 10:38 PM
  #34  
On The Tree
iTrader: (27)
 
Dave_the_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Middle of nowhere, Ny
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Regardless what anyone may say there will always be someone faster....


Car is def pretty bad ***. But not my cup of tea. If I can't work on it in my garage myself then I probably shouldn't own it lol
Old 06-09-2012, 08:48 AM
  #35  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Turbo_Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: League City,Tx
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave_the_SS
Regardless what anyone may say there will always be someone faster....


Car is def pretty bad ***. But not my cup of tea. If I can't work on it in my garage myself then I probably shouldn't own it lol
My wife says there is something wrong with me.Cause no matter how much money I make I just cant get away from Mustangs.Hell I even just sold the Vette to get back into another stang (This is number 21 to be exact) but I guess being able to build em blind folded and in my sleep helps a lot
Old 06-10-2012, 10:16 AM
  #36  
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
 
ls1n00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UTzo6
Pfttt, not impressed... I would totally rather have a 1000 hp tt 10+ year old fbody than that euro trash.
Not all cars are made to go fast in a straight line, bud.
Even though the price is pretty ridicolous, its an amazing car.
Old 06-10-2012, 02:13 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls1n00b
Not all cars are made to go fast in a straight line, bud.
Even though the price is pretty ridicolous, its an amazing car.
Sarcasm
Old 06-10-2012, 02:52 PM
  #38  
LS7 Member
 
UTzo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: HOUSTON
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by winters97gt
Sarcasm
Old 06-11-2012, 08:13 AM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think this maybe UGR's "new platform" to compete against the GTR for 1/4 mile racing. I think it's going to be getting it done.
The GTR's I've seen at TK2K12 didnt really impress me as far as ET goes but they didnt need a burnout either and some of them probably were on street tires. Some were on drag radials it looked like...but none of them seemed to 60 ft well. I'm talking low 10's MAYBE a high 9 at 145-150mph... Those traps should be good for low 9's. They just didnt seem to be setup to launch hard. AWD on the street however is the cat's meow and they would work great there.

Now the AMS Alpha Omega that went 8.72 did impress me abit but even then, I think it trapped 172 mph or something like that? Thats good for abit lower 8's in the right chassis setup.

I think the gallardo has already been 170's in the 1/4 mile leaving off 4 drag radials but still only ran low 9's or something? Its been awhile since I seen the vid. Amazing cars but not great drag racing applications at the strip
Old 06-11-2012, 04:30 PM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
The GTR's I've seen at TK2K12 didnt really impress me as far as ET goes but they didnt need a burnout either and some of them probably were on street tires. Some were on drag radials it looked like...but none of them seemed to 60 ft well. I'm talking low 10's MAYBE a high 9 at 145-150mph... Those traps should be good for low 9's. They just didnt seem to be setup to launch hard. AWD on the street however is the cat's meow and they would work great there.

Now the AMS Alpha Omega that went 8.72 did impress me abit but even then, I think it trapped 172 mph or something like that? Thats good for abit lower 8's in the right chassis setup.

I think the gallardo has already been 170's in the 1/4 mile leaving off 4 drag radials but still only ran low 9's or something? Its been awhile since I seen the vid. Amazing cars but not great drag racing applications at the strip
1/4 mile racing was main goal for the AMS GTR and UGR Gallardo owners. I bet they are disappoint.


Quick Reply: The "FIRST" Twin Turbo Lamborghi Aventador just rolled off the assembly line



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.