hornets got OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL!!!!!!!!!!
05-09-2008, 11:17 AM
#61
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hows that?
All that you have posted the last week is how this series is going to end up 4-1. But when it comes down to it. All that you do is talk. I'm not going to bet 80 just to win 20 in a bet that you "supposedly" have all the confidence in the world about. If I prove you wrong in 1 post. All that you do is come back with some new BS. You say I have my blinders on and that Im bias. You obviously havent read my threads. I really do think after seeing SA in game 3. That SA can lose in 6 or 7. They havent looked good. If I had my blinders on, I'd be saying that SA is going to win in 6 blah blah blah. But thats not the case. I also didnt make any excuses for NO winning th 1st 2 games. Either you're seeing **** or your thinking of someone else when you make all these BS replies to me.
All that you have posted the last week is how this series is going to end up 4-1. But when it comes down to it. All that you do is talk. I'm not going to bet 80 just to win 20 in a bet that you "supposedly" have all the confidence in the world about. If I prove you wrong in 1 post. All that you do is come back with some new BS. You say I have my blinders on and that Im bias. You obviously havent read my threads. I really do think after seeing SA in game 3. That SA can lose in 6 or 7. They havent looked good. If I had my blinders on, I'd be saying that SA is going to win in 6 blah blah blah. But thats not the case. I also didnt make any excuses for NO winning th 1st 2 games. Either you're seeing **** or your thinking of someone else when you make all these BS replies to me.
way too big of a block of text for me to read.
SA is old. Cp3 playground ball > *
05-09-2008, 11:35 AM
#64
from watching the game, it seemed like NO was barely even trying was still beating the spurs. honestly, the spurs yes they won, didnt really seem impressive in the win. i was expecting the spurs to come out blazing!! but it was NO pretty much. even when the spurs would hit those 3 pointers and all it was either NO still had the lead or would take the lead right back.
its damn near the perfect scenario for the hornets.. win game 4 and finish the series at home for the NO crowd.
its damn near the perfect scenario for the hornets.. win game 4 and finish the series at home for the NO crowd.
05-09-2008, 12:54 PM
#66
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from watching the game, it seemed like NO was barely even trying was still beating the spurs. honestly, the spurs yes they won, didnt really seem impressive in the win. i was expecting the spurs to come out blazing!! but it was NO pretty much. even when the spurs would hit those 3 pointers and all it was either NO still had the lead or would take the lead right back.
its damn near the perfect scenario for the hornets.. win game 4 and finish the series at home for the NO crowd.
its damn near the perfect scenario for the hornets.. win game 4 and finish the series at home for the NO crowd.
05-09-2008, 01:03 PM
#67
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SOOOO much bullshit talking in here from non-SA fans which is cool but wait it out and see what happens.
Both teams wanted to win and the spurs didn't get alot of foul calls they should have gotten so it kept NO in the game early. NO hit alot of their shots too which kept them in it.. We just limited PEJA and his nice 3 pointers. They shot 49% to our 48% but this time the spurs were able to penetrate and get points in the paint. Like said, we exploited their double team
Stats show this game wasn't any different as far as effort from the hornets.. The only difference is PEJA's numbers...game 1 -22, game 2 -25, game 3 -8points Every other players seems about right and their Shooting % gm1 -50%, gm2 -48%, gm3 -49%
Both teams wanted to win and the spurs didn't get alot of foul calls they should have gotten so it kept NO in the game early. NO hit alot of their shots too which kept them in it.. We just limited PEJA and his nice 3 pointers. They shot 49% to our 48% but this time the spurs were able to penetrate and get points in the paint. Like said, we exploited their double team
Stats show this game wasn't any different as far as effort from the hornets.. The only difference is PEJA's numbers...game 1 -22, game 2 -25, game 3 -8points Every other players seems about right and their Shooting % gm1 -50%, gm2 -48%, gm3 -49%
Last edited by DarkhorSe_SS; 05-09-2008 at 01:11 PM.
05-09-2008, 01:31 PM
#69
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-09-2008, 01:45 PM
#70
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude I was there and saw they came out to play and were ready. Wasn't it a quick 8-0 to start off? How did they not show up?? their numbers/% are the same as the first two games but peja's points were missing. I think you need pay more attn. to the game and just because a team lost doesn't mean they didn't show up. Their game plan wasn't working tonight. How many lay-ups did the spurs get first two games?? not many
How many yesterday?? doubled the first two games total
Don't make yourself look stupid
05-09-2008, 01:50 PM
#71
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
**** pre/post game talk..
dude I was there and saw they came out to play and were ready. Wasn't it a quick 8-0 to start off? How did they not show up?? their numbers/% are the same as the first two games but peja's points were missing. I think you need pay more attn. to the game and just because a team lost doesn't mean they didn't show up. Their game plan wasn't working tonight. How many lay-ups did the spurs get first two games?? not many
How many yesterday?? doubled the first two games total
Don't make yourself look stupid
dude I was there and saw they came out to play and were ready. Wasn't it a quick 8-0 to start off? How did they not show up?? their numbers/% are the same as the first two games but peja's points were missing. I think you need pay more attn. to the game and just because a team lost doesn't mean they didn't show up. Their game plan wasn't working tonight. How many lay-ups did the spurs get first two games?? not many
How many yesterday?? doubled the first two games total
Don't make yourself look stupid
keep acting like you know what you are talking about.
you just sound like an ignorant bias SA fan.
05-09-2008, 02:03 PM
#72
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not being bias here.. NO should win this series but I hope the spurs remain aggressive like they were yesterday. I'm putting stats in your face to show you NO wasn't any different as a team yesterday. If you don't understand that then quit talkin ****.
Spurs aggressiveness was the difference yesterday besides lack of peja's play.
05-09-2008, 02:16 PM
#73
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do know what I'm talking about
I am not being bias here.. NO should win this series but I hope the spurs remain aggressive like they were yesterday. I'm putting stats in your face to show you NO wasn't any different as a team yesterday. If you don't understand that then quit talkin ****.
Spurs aggressiveness was the difference yesterday besides lack of peja's play.
I am not being bias here.. NO should win this series but I hope the spurs remain aggressive like they were yesterday. I'm putting stats in your face to show you NO wasn't any different as a team yesterday. If you don't understand that then quit talkin ****.
Spurs aggressiveness was the difference yesterday besides lack of peja's play.
SA is old. Get that through your head.
05-09-2008, 02:40 PM
#75
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spurs City!!! SA, Tx
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your read back in my prev posts, I stated the spurs are old.
TXZ28 -spurs don't have to blow them out the way they got blown out in NO. A win is a win!!
we shall see for game 4 on sunday...
05-09-2008, 02:48 PM
#76
yeah they didnt need to blow out the hornets!! and a win is win. i was just surprised that the hornets had the spurs on the ropes and almost could have pulled that game when it wasnt even a must win for them.
plus peja and morris peterson didnt really do much and they still almost won..
but yeah man, we will see game 4.
05-09-2008, 04:45 PM
#77
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love how all the Spurs haters really come out during the playoffs 
The Spurs really did not impress me that much til towards the end of the fourth quarter.
As far as Chris Paul goes, I really don't think he's that great of a player. Every time he gets open enough to take a shot, its not because of him at all. Its because somebody else sets up a screen or a block and takes out the defender. Anybody could make as many shots as him if they had somebody like that screening for them.
The Spurs really did not impress me that much til towards the end of the fourth quarter.
As far as Chris Paul goes, I really don't think he's that great of a player. Every time he gets open enough to take a shot, its not because of him at all. Its because somebody else sets up a screen or a block and takes out the defender. Anybody could make as many shots as him if they had somebody like that screening for them.
05-09-2008, 04:48 PM
#78
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love how all the Spurs haters really come out during the playoffs
The Spurs really did not impress me that much til towards the end of the fourth quarter.
As far as Chris Paul goes, I really don't think he's that great of a player. Every time he gets open enough to take a shot, its not because of him at all. Its because somebody else sets up a screen or a block and takes out the defender. Anybody could make as many shots as him if they had somebody like that screening for them.
The Spurs really did not impress me that much til towards the end of the fourth quarter.
As far as Chris Paul goes, I really don't think he's that great of a player. Every time he gets open enough to take a shot, its not because of him at all. Its because somebody else sets up a screen or a block and takes out the defender. Anybody could make as many shots as him if they had somebody like that screening for them.
hell, name a better player than him besides Lebron and Kobe. He is in his first playoff series and he is making it look easier than everyone else.
I don't think the Spurs fan watch the OTHER team during the game, they got those blinders on.
05-09-2008, 04:58 PM
#79
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
name a better PG in the NBA....
hell, name a better player than him besides Lebron and Kobe. He is in his first playoff series and he is making it look easier than everyone else.
I don't think the Spurs fan watch the OTHER team during the game, they got those blinders on.
hell, name a better player than him besides Lebron and Kobe. He is in his first playoff series and he is making it look easier than everyone else.
I don't think the Spurs fan watch the OTHER team during the game, they got those blinders on.
05-09-2008, 05:20 PM
#80
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm Tony Parker ring any bells? As many times as I've seen him sacrifice his body to get to the rim and as many times as he's scored and helped secure a W, as well as how he helps carry his entire team I firmly believe that partly due to experience he is a better player than CP3. With experience however, CP3 could very well be one of the best, if not the best, PG in the NBA.
Chris Paul, Deron Williams and Steve Nash.
see, ls1ech wouldn't even let me put that on the same line