Western Members CA, AZ, NV, UT, CO, NM, HI

For the H8ters:details leaked on 2011-12 mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2009, 06:14 PM
  #121  
Teching In
 
HEYPAL01impala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well the current mustang weighs in the 3500+ range. The new one shouldn't be too much more. That 200lb over the m3 was a typo...was suppost to be the other way around. I see the car pushing high 3600lbs but not much more Ford doesn't fail that bad. So it should be an interesting car minus the horrible looking rear end of the car.

And yes I also have a mustang and it is a very good car.
Old 09-05-2009, 06:35 PM
  #122  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
iluvmuffz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ridiculous how far this thread has got. Bottom line, the mustang looks like ***

Last edited by iluvmuffz28; 09-06-2009 at 12:47 AM.
Old 09-05-2009, 07:11 PM
  #123  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
at you people calling the camaro or mustang a "sports" car...

you need to look up the definition of sports car and muscle car..

BOTH are muscle cars... the vette is a sports car.. a 2 door 2 seater...
My camaro has 1 seat, dose that make it a super sports car?
Old 09-05-2009, 07:19 PM
  #124  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (76)
 
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XpEdItIoUs
My camaro has 1 seat, dose that make it a super sports car?
Ivan don't lie, you know you have 0 seats and use the shifter as your seat
Old 09-05-2009, 10:52 PM
  #125  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94'BLKBRD
Ivan don't lie, you know you have 0 seats and use the shifter as your seat
So then that means you used that black guy that found you passed out as a seat?, Is that right juanito?
Old 09-05-2009, 11:12 PM
  #126  
Teching In
 
Z28 Bacon Evader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cali
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mustangs have better interiors and they are cute.
Old 09-05-2009, 11:15 PM
  #127  
TECH Apprentice
 
Zaxz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Grandma loves mustangs.....Maybe you mustang guys can talk to her
Old 09-05-2009, 11:33 PM
  #128  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (76)
 
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XpEdItIoUs
So then that means you used that black guy that found you passed out as a seat?, Is that right juanito?
si tu dices guey
Old 09-05-2009, 11:48 PM
  #129  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Shifter as a seat........ !!!
Old 09-05-2009, 11:58 PM
  #130  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (76)
 
94'BLKBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Shifter as a seat........ !!!
That's how Ivan roles, he wants to save all the weight he can.
Old 09-06-2009, 05:03 AM
  #131  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ReedBooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arodsvt
2011-2012 Mustang Info

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.7L V6 to be rated at 315 horsepower: Same as 2010 GT; 15 hp more than Camaro V6
No immediate plans for EcoBoost V6 Mustang due to small horsepower gap between EcoBoost and 5.0L V8 (365 vs 400)
2011 Mustang GT to be rated at 400 horsepower, will get increase in 2012
2011 Mustang GT to get 6-speed transmission and variable valve timing
2011 Mustang GT Track Pack to include Brembo brakes
2011 Mustang GT 5.0L V8, 6-speed, track pack, Brembo brakes ran even with 414-hp BMW M3, which is 200 lbs lighter, at GingerMan Raceway in South Haven, Michigan
2011 Shelby GT500 to get Aluminum Block
Next special edition: 2012 Boss

Arguing on the internet is like winning the special olympics,even if you win your still messed up.
Camaros will be our b*tchs now..............
Funny, I work for Ford Sales division and I don't remember seeing anything about the 2011 Mustang that was stated in this initial thread post. If I remember correctly we just released the 2010 a sleight couple months ago and are more focused on getting the new model in the hands of the public at this point. 2011 is less than a production year off and I see no change at this point. Ecoboost is for cars that require better fuel economy with a side effect of high performance. The mustang has no problem with either of those categories right now.

Brembo's on mainstream production cars like the GT is not uncommon, Dodge did it with the SRT platform, so what's new?

The GT500 with an aluminum block is a disastrous idea right now, considering how much can be lost in production changes in the platform and hoping that there are no faults in the new casting process. I'd expect it in 2013.

Essentially, there is nothing new or unexpected in your initial post other than options that some other manufacturers have been using for a few years now.

BTW, no 5.0 in 2011 GT. Don't know where that came from other than the factory ordered race car, but that can't be considered because it is in no way street legal...

I'll drive my Camaro to work next week just for you. Just like I do every week. How's that sound?

And also, where will the BOSS fit in since we already have a 500 horse GT500? How about we spend more money on making a middle road option for the retard who can't decide whether we wants small ***** or really small *****? Oh yeah, I forgot, they almost made the GT-R. ALMOST. God forbid they give more reason to give you the ricer denomination than you have already earned....

BTW again, where's your link to this 'Information'? I'd love to see it.

Last edited by ReedBooth; 09-06-2009 at 05:13 AM.
Old 09-06-2009, 09:00 PM
  #132  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
krazy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

An ecoboost mustang would be sick in my opinion.
Old 09-06-2009, 09:14 PM
  #133  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Fatbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ReedBooth
Funny, I work for Ford Sales division and I don't remember seeing anything about the 2011 Mustang that was stated in this initial thread post. If I remember correctly we just released the 2010 a sleight couple months ago and are more focused on getting the new model in the hands of the public at this point. 2011 is less than a production year off and I see no change at this point. Ecoboost is for cars that require better fuel economy with a side effect of high performance. The mustang has no problem with either of those categories right now.

Brembo's on mainstream production cars like the GT is not uncommon, Dodge did it with the SRT platform, so what's new?

The GT500 with an aluminum block is a disastrous idea right now, considering how much can be lost in production changes in the platform and hoping that there are no faults in the new casting process. I'd expect it in 2013.

Essentially, there is nothing new or unexpected in your initial post other than options that some other manufacturers have been using for a few years now.

BTW, no 5.0 in 2011 GT. Don't know where that came from other than the factory ordered race car, but that can't be considered because it is in no way street legal...

I'll drive my Camaro to work next week just for you. Just like I do every week. How's that sound?

And also, where will the BOSS fit in since we already have a 500 horse GT500? How about we spend more money on making a middle road option for the retard who can't decide whether we wants small ***** or really small *****? Oh yeah, I forgot, they almost made the GT-R. ALMOST. God forbid they give more reason to give you the ricer denomination than you have already earned....

BTW again, where's your link to this 'Information'? I'd love to see it.
It has been rumored forever that the 2011 Mustang GT will be getting the 5.0L Coyote engine.

I would be willing to bet a pint of my own blood that the 2011 Mustang GT weighs in not a single pound shy of 3650lbs. As long as it has the 5.0L in it. My horsepower means beefier driveline.
Old 09-06-2009, 09:33 PM
  #134  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JeaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fatbum
It has been rumored forever that the 2011 Mustang GT will be getting the 5.0L Coyote engine.

I would be willing to bet a pint of my own blood that the 2011 Mustang GT weighs in not a single pound shy of 3650lbs. As long as it has the 5.0L in it. My horsepower means beefier driveline.
I read somewhere is supposed to be over 3900 for all the safety requirements for 2012
Old 09-06-2009, 09:41 PM
  #135  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JeaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 11 Mustang supposably weighs 200lbs more than the BMW M3 which weighs 3700lbs.


http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-for...t-the-web.html
Old 09-06-2009, 10:03 PM
  #136  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
m6ttop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: anaheim, ca
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ReedBooth
Funny, I work for Ford Sales division and I don't remember seeing anything about the 2011 Mustang that was stated in this initial thread post. If I remember correctly we just released the 2010 a sleight couple months ago and are more focused on getting the new model in the hands of the public at this point. 2011 is less than a production year off and I see no change at this point. Ecoboost is for cars that require better fuel economy with a side effect of high performance. The mustang has no problem with either of those categories right now.

Brembo's on mainstream production cars like the GT is not uncommon, Dodge did it with the SRT platform, so what's new?

The GT500 with an aluminum block is a disastrous idea right now, considering how much can be lost in production changes in the platform and hoping that there are no faults in the new casting process. I'd expect it in 2013.

Essentially, there is nothing new or unexpected in your initial post other than options that some other manufacturers have been using for a few years now.

BTW, no 5.0 in 2011 GT. Don't know where that came from other than the factory ordered race car, but that can't be considered because it is in no way street legal...

I'll drive my Camaro to work next week just for you. Just like I do every week. How's that sound?

And also, where will the BOSS fit in since we already have a 500 horse GT500? How about we spend more money on making a middle road option for the retard who can't decide whether we wants small ***** or really small *****? Oh yeah, I forgot, they almost made the GT-R. ALMOST. God forbid they give more reason to give you the ricer denomination than you have already earned....

BTW again, where's your link to this 'Information'? I'd love to see it.
Straight from the horses mouth haha
Old 09-06-2009, 10:56 PM
  #137  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
180ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JeaneZ28
The 11 Mustang supposably weighs 200lbs more than the BMW M3 which weighs 3700lbs.


http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-for...t-the-web.html
That seemed to be one of the things that ford was staying good at with the mustang but i guess that is no longer.
Old 09-07-2009, 04:48 AM
  #138  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nitr0racing21
3.6 300 HP


3.7 315 hp

Don't you mustang **** bitch about GM having more liters? boo hoo 15 horse




oh no not 400 horse power



oh no the GT 500 IS IN THE 11's STOCK OMG a 80k pony!!



Face is ford won't beat GM unless its boosted



AND WHEN(not if) THE Z28 comes out i'll laugh at all of you ford fans




Ford boys are worse then honda boys, MANN you have a bigger motor so I have boost.


GM Men reply: HA your blower to my spray bitch
really?

care to race a mustang with a stock bottom end 302 with heads, cam and an intake? All motor and less cubes... Now what?
Old 09-07-2009, 04:57 AM
  #139  
TECH Apprentice
 
Qwiknotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Granada Hills, Ca
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 180ls1
i find it funny that a 1993 z28 will outrun an 2004 mustang Gt and a 1998 z28 will outrun a 2009 mustang gt.

So ya it looks like they are coming up to their normal 10 year cycle it takes to catch up.
I find it funny that an '87-90 fox body will outrun any year Camaro, with the factory longblock. Let me re-phrase that. Any 87-90 fox body that I have worked on, that still has the factory shortblock in it.

Got one sitting at the shop right now. 302, AFR heads, edelbrock intake, runs 11.50's on the motor all day long and the engine has 180K on it. On the unit, it runs 10.20's with a factory T5 trans.

Just because some douchebags don't know how to build cars doesn't mean they all suck. It goes for Ford and Chevy guys. I have seen 2002 Camaro's with LS1's, AFR 215's, cam, nitrous, and drag radials and it was running 11.40's.. Same day at the track, we took my buddies 2001 camaro with the same AFR heads, different cam and slicks and it ran 11.40's, n/a with the a/c and all accessories still on it.
Old 09-07-2009, 07:56 AM
  #140  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JeaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Qwiknotch
I find it funny that an '87-90 fox body will outrun any year Camaro, with the factory longblock. Let me re-phrase that. Any 87-90 fox body that I have worked on, that still has the factory shortblock in it.

Got one sitting at the shop right now. 302, AFR heads, edelbrock intake, runs 11.50's on the motor all day long and the engine has 180K on it. On the unit, it runs 10.20's with a factory T5 trans.

Just because some douchebags don't know how to build cars doesn't mean they all suck. It goes for Ford and Chevy guys. I have seen 2002 Camaro's with LS1's, AFR 215's, cam, nitrous, and drag radials and it was running 11.40's.. Same day at the track, we took my buddies 2001 camaro with the same AFR heads, different cam and slicks and it ran 11.40's, n/a with the a/c and all accessories still on it.
Thinks about what you saying before you make a dumbass comment like that. There are stock f-bodys running faster than 11.50s.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...1-74-bump.html


Quick Reply: For the H8ters:details leaked on 2011-12 mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.