First start up on the MS3 cam.
First start up on the MS3 cam. I've been doing this build since march, the only reason that I've left it alone and haven't finished is because funds. Finally got this bad boy started up. Ms3 cam and ported 243's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3M-e96auRw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3M-e96auRw
Trending Topics
Thanks Adam. I was actually going to go with the torquerv2 cam but heard good things about the ms cams and said what the hell, it's not going to be my DD anyway.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Well on stock cubes you can only flow so much, the cam would require more than what is available. Yes you can say that it will only allow as much as the engine will allow but hey. I just say efficient because it is in a sense an efficient way to make power, you are using what you have to its potential and not pushing it. On stock cubes, like stock bottom end MS4 is a bit much.
Well on stock cubes you can only flow so much, the cam would require more than what is available. Yes you can say that it will only allow as much as the engine will allow but hey. I just say efficient because it is in a sense an efficient way to make power, you are using what you have to its potential and not pushing it. On stock cubes, like stock bottom end MS4 is a bit much.
Small cams are effecient. I am going to assume this setup is not being used to Its potential. Ms4 is well as ms3 are both max effort cams. Not sure what makes the ms4 too much but the ms3 efficient.
Well on stock cubes you can only flow so much, the cam would require more than what is available. Yes you can say that it will only allow as much as the engine will allow but hey. I just say efficient because it is in a sense an efficient way to make power, you are using what you have to its potential and not pushing it. On stock cubes, like stock bottom end MS4 is a bit much.
personally i like the valve events better with the ms4 cam... the ms3 cam is lazy IMO... it never make decent mid range..great peak number but thats it, i have tuned at least 20+ ms3 cars so i know what i am talking about... the ms4 isnt much better, but its better.... with compression sub 11.1:1 these cams murder the dynamic compression.... throw some decent static compression at these cams then they wake up....but what do i know.....
Well I dunno just seems some MS4 cars make less power than they should, plus you have more ptv issues with the MS4 than an MS3. I know you have done a lot of these cars just saying it is a better cam when using the stock bottom end, no accounting for dished pistons or flycutting valve reliefs, just tossing a cam in and going (yes there is more to it than that you should know what i mean lol).