LS1 is fast!
06-07-2007, 09:55 AM
#21
Originally Posted by Black02LS1
But that Neck-n-neck was me in 3rd and you in 2nd. The last one when i started in 2nd i pulled on you!
well thats because i let off. the car infront of me was getting closer and closer. u still didnt pull on me more than a fender.guess we will have to do it again.
06-07-2007, 01:41 PM
#22
Launching!
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eddielb
hell no a ls2 gto pulled on me like I was standing still, he had like 3-4 cars on me, I know I don't got any mods except my cutout but still, he was stock too, and I know my rims don't make THAT much of a difference and im an auto w/ traction control turned off
Not all ls1s are created equal
06-07-2007, 02:25 PM
#24
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 01SOMSS!
well thats because i let off. the car infront of me was getting closer and closer. u still didnt pull on me more than a fender.guess we will have to do it again.
06-07-2007, 03:10 PM
#25
Originally Posted by Black02LS1
Yes we shall!
ok back to work you guys go and ill get the girlfriends 
06-07-2007, 03:31 PM
#27
Originally Posted by GDBY2U
It Would Suck To Get Beat By A Stock Gto 5.7 Or 6.0! It's Just A 4000 Pound Rear Drive Cavalier!! 
06-07-2007, 04:04 PM
#30
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
first of all, 3725 lbs != 4000lbs
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
06-07-2007, 04:16 PM
#31
Launching!
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mooninitesunite
first of all, 3725 lbs != 4000lbs
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
06-07-2007, 05:06 PM
#32
Staging Lane
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree, though, it is way overweight...but it's not a pony car...I wish it was around 3500 lbs, though, instead of 3700lbs...and i wish it had room for more tire up front and out back...but then again, it's a GT car, not a pony car...I want my bro's Trans Am right about now hahaha
06-07-2007, 06:11 PM
#33
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
u guys gripe over a couple hundred pounds like the ************ was a lincoln towncar versus a notchback...a trans am/camaro is NOT light either for the love of Jesus
06-07-2007, 09:02 PM
#36
Originally Posted by mooninitesunite
first of all, 3725 lbs != 4000lbs
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
ls1 = slow GTO
ls2 = faster GTO, better rear end and stronger+faster tranny, etc. etc., with very very minimal weight increase...we're talking <20 lbs increase.
Losing to a stock ls2 GTO should humble you guys. 0-60 in 4.6-5 seconds on average for an ls2 gto is no joke. and neither is a high 12 1/4 mile out of the box for a stock auto ls2.
/my gto owner rant
06-07-2007, 10:43 PM
#38
ls2 are no joke thats for sure. and yes alot of people can put these cars in low 13s to high 12s with stock tires. dont hear that from too many full on stock ls1 f-bodies without having drag radials. and plus i eat SS camaros with ease, u guys talk about the 200 or so pounds difference like rice rocket drivers thats y they all buy hatchbacks. stock gtos put anywhere from 330-350 to the wheels they all vary really. few extra pounds **** it i got a few extra cubes that make up the difference.
06-07-2007, 11:55 PM
#40
Originally Posted by Dabeztz28
I eat GTOs fro breakfast! but there so fat i have left overs for the rest of the week.
CAMARO > GTO
CAMARO > GTO
must be modded cuz no stock SS or STOCK 03 04 terminator cobra nor a stock c5 has beat me yet. 