new Challenger
#42
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So if it's deficient in the 1/4 mile, heavy, expensive, but still sells, is it a bad overpriced vehicle? Maybe in the minds of those who can't afford it, don't like the manufacturer, or who prefer straight-line acceleration (or any other set of criteria) as their main measuring stick.
#43
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
found the article
GT500 Challenger
------------------------------------
0-60: 4.3 4.7
1/4mile: 12.6 13.1
lateral g: .89 .87
60-0: 118ft 117ft
mpg 14/20 13/18
this is from Motor Trend, July 2008 Retro Fire
GT500 Challenger
------------------------------------
0-60: 4.3 4.7
1/4mile: 12.6 13.1
lateral g: .89 .87
60-0: 118ft 117ft
mpg 14/20 13/18
this is from Motor Trend, July 2008 Retro Fire