Western Members CA, AZ, NV, UT, CO, NM, HI

2010 Chevy Camaro SS: 0-60 in 4.6 Seconds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2008, 11:51 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 Chevy Camaro SS: 0-60 in 4.6 Seconds

NORTH HOLLYWOOD, California — GM engineers at today's official 2010 Chevrolet Camaro unveil were all too willing to provide performance numbers for their hot, new muscle car, including quarter-mile and 0-60-mph times.

Al Oppenheiser, chief engineer for GM's North American rear-wheel-drive platform and owner of a first-generation Camaro convertible, was pleased to run through his baby's accomplishments.

According to Oppenheiser, the new 300-horsepower 3.6-liter V6-equipped Camaro will run from zero to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds regardless of transmission choice. The V6 coupe will cover the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds with an auto and 14.7 seconds with a manual, both at 97 mph. The brakes don't sound quite as impressive, though, as Oppenheiser said the base Camaro stops from 60 to zero mph in 132 feet.

Not surprisingly, the V8-equipped Camaro SS delivers better numbers across the board. Chevy's Camaro SS outfitted with the 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 108 mph according to Oppenheiser. Strangely enough, Oppenheiser also claims that the automatic-equipped SS Camaro, which is rated at 400 hp, runs from zero to 60 mph in just 4.6 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds. "We optimized the shift points," he said.

Both versions of the V8 Camaro SS pull a maximum 0.90 g on the skid pad. Four-piston Brembo brakes help stop the Camaro SS in 117 feet.

What this means to you: If Chevrolet's numbers pan out, the Camaro SS will be every bit as fast as the Dodge Challenger SRT8 for a lot less money. — Kelly Toepke, News Editor


heres the link if you wanna look at pix

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496
Old 07-22-2008, 11:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pretty good but it should have been faster
Old 07-22-2008, 11:55 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BigDaddyBry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Like the Challenger, add it to the list of cars you can already beat.
Old 07-22-2008, 12:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well its still 200lbs lighter and its got the same hp, well I guess will have to wait for a race. Cant wait to see the z/28
Old 07-22-2008, 12:49 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (38)
 
myfast70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Some drag radials and 12's may be right around the corner
Old 07-22-2008, 12:51 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
lilb_svt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So did they say anything about the price?
Old 07-22-2008, 01:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^ Still no pricing. And i think those 1/4mi numbers are watered down. Come on Launch control, it can do better than mid 13's. Let's see here ~400wrhp (per vette dyno's), and 3950lbs = 12.4's in the calculator.
Old 07-22-2008, 01:42 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
noxiouSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the mph is there for a high 12.
Old 07-22-2008, 01:49 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
gangbang malloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

not too worried about it, it only has 22 hp more than our ls2 and i believe its a little bit heavier.

that and its huge 20s and irs will make it suck.

they should have made it a fully forged block ready for some boost then those cars would be ready for turbos and prochargers
Old 07-22-2008, 01:51 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
CaliforniaBoy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gangbang malloy
not too worried about it, it only has 22 hp more than our ls2 and i believe its a little bit heavier.

that and its huge 20s and irs will make it suck.

they should have made it a fully forged block ready for some boost then those cars would be ready for turbos and prochargers
yes because that is very cost effective
Old 07-22-2008, 01:55 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
cruiSSin LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 562/626
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont know about u guys..but a v6 with 300hp and it goes 0-60 in 6.1 sec...isnt that pretty FN good... kinda surprised me
Old 07-22-2008, 01:57 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
gangbang malloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CaliforniaBoy5
yes because that is very cost effective

screw the cost a couple extra thousand fit into the financing and you'll never feel it but u will see the difference at the track
Old 07-22-2008, 02:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
CaliforniaBoy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gangbang malloy
screw the cost a couple extra thousand fit into the financing and you'll never feel it but u will see the difference at the track
no for GM to do that.
that isnt cost effective for them...

you do know they are a business and need to see profitability...
Old 07-22-2008, 02:05 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
R1ch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

13.3!? That's what you get with IRS and big heavy wheels.
Old 07-22-2008, 03:05 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (16)
 
Alex L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by R1ch
13.3!? That's what you get with IRS and big heavy wheels.
I agree. They would drop a few tenth going to a 16 or 17 inch rims easy.
Old 07-22-2008, 03:16 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Almostryan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Alex L.
I agree. They would drop a few tenth going to a 16 or 17 inch rims easy.
Brakes alone are 14.2" diameter in the back + the calipers and you won't be able to fit a rim that small on there. As far as that MPH, 108 can be low 12's if the car hooks like hell, but most likely it won't so that MPH is pretty close to mid-high 13's for a car that heavy that I don't care what GM says probably won't get off the line in a hurry. Over all I just see it being a big disappointment for the drag racers.
Old 07-22-2008, 04:20 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,184
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

I wish it was faster...what does the G8 GT run?
Old 07-22-2008, 04:31 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Almostryan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
I wish it was faster...what does the G8 GT run?
There is a magnacharged 500rwhp one at fontana that runs low 8's
Old 07-22-2008, 04:37 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

they handle good tho, they get .9 on the skid pad that pretty impressive. Yeah they should have made it faster.
Old 07-22-2008, 04:39 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
 
whatsgrip?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much power are cam only LS3 vettes putting down?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.