to many variables... ill throw in $10 though. find 9 others willing.

 

What I'm getting at is if the cats do their job, to what degree are they decreasing the values you could potentially read.

 

like i said, you will put your engine at risk but arent willing to bet 100 dollars on the product in which you stand behind?

 

the cats can only do so much, if the engine temp and cat temp are the same upon testing there will be no difference in their performance

 

What was my first post about? I asked you for your input. Now you turn it around on my like its something i stand by? Come on now Luke?

 

im just giving ya a hard time nick,

 

Right. Either way im not gonna do it. Dont have enough time to put miles on it with the seafoam in the crank case. So ima do everything else.

And come on fellas $10 bucks IF we loose. 9 other people?

 

I think Luke has something to tell us.....

 

??????

 

???????

 

???????

 

?????

 

???????

 

???????

 

?????????

 

???????

 

??????

 

?????!

 

pardon mua???????

 

i seafoamed my 2000 s10 with a 4.3, before i was skeptic on this stuff cause i dont trust any of that ****, but i figured what the hell the truck was running like **** cause my cars always sit and the fuel rots, so i dumped half in the tank and half down the brake booster line while it was running and HOLY **** that thing smoked like a ***** for like 10 minutes, after that it ran like a champ, i smogged it 5 months later and the guy said that thing ran better than new. He said almost no emissions haha but after doin all that, i heard later on that it can ruin your cats, o well it worked than, but thats my experiance, and i did no other changes between the last smog and that one other than a filter and couple oil changes, o and a hot lap round town like i always do to get that cat cookin