Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Somebody please check my valve spring math

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2006, 07:14 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
wicked_95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Somebody please check my valve spring math

Alright, 918 beehive springs coil bind @ 1.140". Now if the springs are installed @ 1.740" with a .628" lift cam at max lift the spring is compressed to 1.112" which is .028" lower than coil bind. If I install these springs @ 1.800" that will put me at about .032" above coil bind. First of all, is this correct. Secondly, if it is right will I be okay to run up to 7K rpm with the valves setup at 1.800"
Old 11-01-2006, 08:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With those numbers, the math looks good.

Don't forget to account for any shims and lifter pre-load in your clearance.
Old 11-01-2006, 08:41 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GOaT Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wicked_95z
Alright, 918 beehive springs coil bind @ 1.140". Now if the springs are installed @ 1.740" with a .628" lift cam at max lift the spring is compressed to 1.112" which is .028" lower than coil bind. If I install these springs @ 1.800" that will put me at about .032" above coil bind. First of all, is this correct. Secondly, if it is right will I be okay to run up to 7K rpm with the valves setup at 1.800"
You are gonna need more than .032 clearance before coil stack. I would recomend at least .050. I speak from experience, I had exactly .030 at max lift with a .600 solid roller. Like clockwork at 6400 rpm's I crash valves, below 6400 everything was fine. I cut the spring pockets on the heads .020 to give me .050 before stack and that extra .020 curred the problem completely.
Old 11-01-2006, 11:07 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes that will be fine in terms of installed height and room to coil bind. The 918's can coil bind lower than 1.140" so check them before you install them and even at a tight clearance they work fine.

I would just be worried that its not enough valve spring for them, 130lbs on the seat is a little weak for most stuff going to 7000rpm.

Bret
Old 11-01-2006, 11:19 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
skipperbisket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so Bret speaking in ls1s what would be the most suitable seat pressure for a hyd cam with mild to high lift and still keeping those higher rpm ranges?
Old 11-02-2006, 04:58 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
wicked_95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just so I understand completely. What is the difference between seat pressure and open pressure?? Also, installed height is inversely proportional to seat pressure correct??
Old 11-02-2006, 10:39 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The seat pressure is the closed pressure at the specified install height.

Open pressure is the value at max valve lift.

Seat pressure and open pressure reduce as install height increases.
Old 11-02-2006, 05:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Seat load = (Free length - Installed height) X stiffness

or if the load is only given at 1.8"

Seat load = Load at 1.8" + (1.8 - Installed height) X stiffness

Open load = Seat load + (Installed height - valve lift) X stiffness

So as the installed height decreases, seat load increases. Since stiffness is for the most part linear, the open load will go up by the seat pressure increase.

For 918's, stiffness = 313 lb/in, load @ 1.8" = 130 lb

So for your installed height of 1.74"

Seat load = 130 + (1.8-1.74) X 313 = 148.78 lbs

Open load = 148.78 + 0.628 X 313 = 345.344 lbs
Old 11-02-2006, 07:13 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
wicked_95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bret, what pressure do you recommend for seat and open for a .606 and .628 cam and 15psi.

Thanks guys for the calculations, good info
Old 11-02-2006, 07:43 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by skipperbisket
so Bret speaking in ls1s what would be the most suitable seat pressure for a hyd cam with mild to high lift and still keeping those higher rpm ranges?
Originally Posted by wicked_95z
Bret, what pressure do you recommend for seat and open for a .606 and .628 cam and 15psi.

Thanks guys for the calculations, good info

Depends on the lobe, the rest of the parts in the system and the RPM range.

Bret



Quick Reply: Somebody please check my valve spring math



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.