Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

drawbacks of using a TC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2006, 07:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1999 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: detroit area
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default drawbacks of using a TC

i have a 00 T/A thats gonna have all bolt ons and some vincci 1.8 roller rockers and stock cam and am considering getting a 2800-3200 stahl. what are the cons or drawbacks (besides tire smoke) of a higher stahl T/C?

this car is my daily driver and will never see the track. im not even sure if its practical because i drive it in the winter/snow (with 16' all season tires) and i think the str would keap me from getting any traction from a stop.

let me hear your guys opinion on this cuz im really on the fence on this one.
Old 01-24-2006, 07:37 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
 
2001WS6Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A drawback would be if you go with too high of a stall. I had a 3400 in my car for awhile and just did not care for the loose feel so I put the 2600 back in. Now the 2600 has no drawbacks at all. The car probably should have come with one.
Old 01-24-2006, 08:47 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
The Sad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No real draw backs. Go with a 3000 at least. It should be better in winter because you do not transfer as much power to the wheels with the bigger stall until you get closer to the stall speed. I highly recommend a stall, makes the car a ton more fun to drive.
Old 01-24-2006, 08:52 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mpe488's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

aren't gas mileage and decreased transmission longevity drawbacks??? (unless you get a tranny cooler which is also a drawback.)
Old 01-24-2006, 11:38 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
The Sad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How is getting a tranny cooler a drawback? Just consider it part of the converter install.

Gas mileage doesn't really change much, depends a little on how big you go. Highway mileage remains about the same.

I haven't heard about tranny longevity issues. I had my Midwest 3200 in for over 2 yrs along with removing torque management with no problems.
Old 01-25-2006, 06:17 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
corvet786c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Port St. Lucie, Fl
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

In my opinion there are no draw backs except for the gas mileage. I have a 3200 Yank Converter and you notice the gas change but not much.If you go like a 3600 stall or higher I would recomend a trans cooler.
Old 01-25-2006, 12:02 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corvet786c
In my opinion there are no draw backs except for the gas mileage. I have a 3200 Yank Converter and you notice the gas change but not much.If you go like a 3600 stall or higher I would recomend a trans cooler.
I would get a bigger cooler regardless of what aftermarket converter you get.
Old 01-25-2006, 12:05 PM
  #8  
Launching!
 
C5XTASY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Monticello, MN
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corvet786c
In my opinion there are no draw backs except for the gas mileage. I have a 3200 Yank Converter and you notice the gas change but not much.If you go like a 3600 stall or higher I would recomend a trans cooler.

I see you're using the Yank SS3200. How is that converter from a slow takeoff. I've been told they are very tight, which is what I want. Thanks!
Ed
Old 01-25-2006, 06:03 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1999 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: detroit area
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C5XTASY
I see you're using the Yank SS3200. How is that converter from a slow takeoff. I've been told they are very tight, which is what I want. Thanks!
Ed
when you say "tight" what does that mean?
Old 01-25-2006, 06:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
slimcracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: pensacola, fl.
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

doesnt take much of any more throttle to move it from a stop..
Old 01-25-2006, 06:42 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Highway mileage will remain the same since it locks up. I was checking my gas mileage when I drove to FL and I got 366 miles before I went to fill up and I still had 3 gallons left. City driving is where things will change but that all depends on how heavy your foot is since it is easier to regulate the pedal better.
Old 01-25-2006, 07:00 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1999 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: detroit area
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slimcracka
doesnt take much of any more throttle to move it from a stop..
when ordering a T/C is their a way to specify more "tight".
are some T/C manufacturers just tighter than others?
if i decide to get a T/C im thinking tighter would be better. are their drawbacks to a tight T/C?
Old 01-25-2006, 07:07 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
slimcracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: pensacola, fl.
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dono just call one of our sponcers(yank, fuddle) and ask them they`ll explain it to ya and tell us the answer i would like to know as well..
Old 01-25-2006, 07:17 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Tight meaning when you give gas how soon the car will react. If the converter is loose, it will take more revs to get the car moving. The tach will also move alot quicker from 1000-2500, looks like the wind is blowing the tach when you tap the gas.
Also if you are on a hill, the car will roll back on you like a manual so be aware of that.
Old 01-25-2006, 07:39 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
The Sad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think STR plays a big part in how tight the converter feels. A tighter feeling converter is less efficient I believe. Not 100% sure on this though.
Old 01-25-2006, 09:07 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
black 2001Vette,Nightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Sad
No real draw backs. Go with a 3000 at least. It should be better in winter because you do not transfer as much power to the wheels with the bigger stall until you get closer to the stall speed. I highly recommend a stall, makes the car a ton more fun to drive.
I agree.
Old 01-26-2006, 09:38 AM
  #17  
Launching!
 
C5XTASY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Monticello, MN
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999 SS
when you say "tight" what does that mean?

What I mean is, how much more, if any, throttle does it take to get it moving from a dead stop, on a gentle start. How different from stock is it? Also, will the car still creep when you put it in gear? That is what I am hoping for, though I realize it will be less than stock. With my current setup, the car idles at 800 rpm, and, in my opinion, actually pulls too hard in gear when the car is stopped. Drivability is a chief concern of mine. I want the performance while sacrificing as little "daily driver drivability" as possible. I believe the Yank SS3200 is the converter I want because of the designed "tightness" of the SS series, but was looking for opinions of users. Thanks!
Ed
Old 01-26-2006, 09:55 AM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
z28convert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eastern, CT
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a vig. 3200 it wont creep and isnt too bad as far as rolling back and there is no drivability issues, i should have gone higher of a stall. it drives pretty good below 3200. Around 1300-2600 is when it takes off from a stop. Not a YankSS but just giving my .02
Old 01-26-2006, 01:39 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C5XTASY
What I mean is, how much more, if any, throttle does it take to get it moving from a dead stop, on a gentle start. How different from stock is it? Also, will the car still creep when you put it in gear? That is what I am hoping for, though I realize it will be less than stock. With my current setup, the car idles at 800 rpm, and, in my opinion, actually pulls too hard in gear when the car is stopped. Drivability is a chief concern of mine. I want the performance while sacrificing as little "daily driver drivability" as possible. I believe the Yank SS3200 is the converter I want because of the designed "tightness" of the SS series, but was looking for opinions of users. Thanks!
Ed
Check post #14
Old 01-26-2006, 06:10 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
C5XTASY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Monticello, MN
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roarin_8
Check post #14

Thanks, I appreciate it. I was also hoping for some real-world experience with a Yank SS3200. I believe they are supposed to be much tighter than the normal 3200 converter.
Ed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.