Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First LS build 67 Skylark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:10 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default First LS build 67 Skylark

Well this is my first Ls build. I have always wanted a Camaro but a couples of months ago I stumbled upon 66 GS400 and I was in love. I stumbled across a 67 Skylark 2 weeks ago gutted out but straight body with very very little rust and I snagged it.

It is going to mostly be a street car, with a little track time.

so far...

debating between LQ9 or LY6 leaning with the LY6 and have started looking.

fuel injected not sure what intake yet but was thinking of maybe a nos upgrade later

200-4R Transmission from Extreme Automatics
not sure on headers yet

gas tank from tanks inc


Flowtech afterburner mufflers.

still have to do inside to looking at bench seats up front

going to start changing the drum brakes to disc next week

as im new to this looking for lots of advice and pointers thanks!!
Attached Thumbnails First LS build 67 Skylark-20141015_123714.jpg   First LS build 67 Skylark-20141022_182641.jpg   First LS build 67 Skylark-20141022_182659.jpg  
Old 10-22-2014, 09:30 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

If I were doing this, I'd be looking for a wrecked HD
Silverado and get the LQ9/4L80E combo. I know it
would fit the '68-'72 A-body. Do not know if the '67
had a ST400 or TH400 option, which would ensure the
tunnel would take the larger case. But why mess with
a 200-4R when you can get much more stout without
even rebuilding?
Old 10-23-2014, 02:37 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Wolf369,
You lucky bastard. LOL>That looks clean. Any more pics of the car?
Old 10-23-2014, 12:38 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
If I were doing this, I'd be looking for a wrecked HD
Silverado and get the LQ9/4L80E combo. I know it
would fit the '68-'72 A-body. Do not know if the '67
had a ST400 or TH400 option, which would ensure the
tunnel would take the larger case. But why mess with
a 200-4R when you can get much more stout without
even rebuilding?
I get the tranny(mine will take the larger case) part but why the lq9 over the ly6. I read the ly6 has more output from the factory?
Old 10-23-2014, 01:25 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I would start reading through the 64-67 A-body conversions on this forum. The Chevelle, GTO/Lemans, Skylarks, Olds versions will all be the same from a mechanical standpoint. You are lucky that at this time there are a lot of conversion parts available that were not just a couple of years ago.
Old 10-23-2014, 06:54 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default thanks!!

thanks for the info
Attached Thumbnails First LS build 67 Skylark-20141023_174703.jpg   First LS build 67 Skylark-20141023_174808.jpg   First LS build 67 Skylark-20141023_174819.jpg  
Old 10-23-2014, 07:02 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey thanks 1989GTA Im open for any advice or anything im might be doing wrong. i have read over speedtigger thread and it helped alot.i saw how you did your gauges i like that
Old 10-23-2014, 08:29 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like more advice between the lq9 and ly6.

or i could do as much as i can and pull for a ls3 next year just would have to wait for upgrades lol
advice please

is it worth waiting? or get the lq9 or ly6
Old 10-23-2014, 08:54 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
aknovaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hog Back, KS
Posts: 1,987
Received 99 Likes on 69 Posts

Default

My buddy built a 67 skylark but he did a body drop onto a c5 Vette chassis. Got some pics if you want them.
Old 10-24-2014, 10:22 AM
  #10  
Teching In
 
cutls67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Going to watch this thread. I have a 67 Cutlass that I am dropping in a Lm7 and 4l80e. I built my own stands and was fortunate to not to have to cut my floor for it to clear. And it only sits at 6 1/2 deg angle. I will be interested to see what direction you go.
Old 10-24-2014, 10:56 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well went i bought the car it was stripped down and cuts and sheet metal had been done for a bigger tranny. i think there were going to use it as a drag car.
Old 10-24-2014, 12:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The LY6 has VVT, 9.6:1 compression ratio and a 56 tooth reluctor. The LQ9 has 10:1 compression ratio and the 24 tooth reluctor.
Old 10-24-2014, 02:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
 
ijimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Got an ly6 and 2004r in my 64 chevelle , awesome combo , runs great stick with a stock tune , ls3 intake , holley 302-2 oilpan , and longtube headers , get the trany upgraded with quality parts , and if you can afford it a "constant presure valve body"
Old 10-24-2014, 08:33 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
 
67Skylark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 344
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

67Skylark, ly6, 4l85E, bench seat and all, Enjoy the build! Questions, just ask, Looking forward to watching your build.
Attached Thumbnails First LS build 67 Skylark-dscf2712.jpg  
Old 10-25-2014, 03:58 PM
  #15  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

My preference for the LQ9 is simply availability & cost.
If you were looking for a pull-out combo there's not
much more common than "work trucks".
Old 10-25-2014, 04:14 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
 
oldgoat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

LQ4 or LQ9, 4L60E fits right in, 4L80E requires some tunnel love. Either is a good choice. The 58 tooth reluctor requires later electronics, could go with a 6L80E if you wanted.
Old 10-25-2014, 04:46 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,127
Received 1,417 Likes on 893 Posts

Default

I would do your engine of choice and use a 4L80/85E. If you don't have any electronics to start with, I would also consider getting the Holley Dominator ECU which would allow you to tune both the engine and trans.

Andrew
Old 10-25-2014, 04:53 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
67Skylark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 344
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Go with the best you can afford. Looks like you got a straight and solid body to start with. It takes a lot of time and cash after you purchase the power plant, so get what you want the first time. LY6 makes a nice cruiser but not much more. I swapped to the VVT cam from 2010 Camaro along with the intake tbody, it gets around fine but after all the work I was hoping for something that pulled harder. I have 3"duals Xpipe long tube headers. I only have a bench tune from PSI, so taking it to a dyno tune may make a difference.
Old 10-25-2014, 09:05 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wolfe369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess that's my big question. I don't want to spend 4000 to 5000 and get average when I'm done. But if I waited just a little and spent 7000 to 8000 and got twice the engine. I don't to spend months pieceing something together then a year later plan an upgrade. I see ls3'some with comp and tranny going for about 6000 lq9 and ly6 for about 1500 but then upgrades.
Old 10-26-2014, 09:27 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
oldgoat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Do some searches for superchargers. I have seen Magnachargers for the LQ's for under $2500.00 from time to time. These really do work quite well. You can make pretty close to 500 rwhp with a pretty stock LQ4 or LQ9, and still have something extremely driveable. I have seen 23 mpg at 70 mph, with the first tune, but who wants to only go 70? Another viable alternative is a turbo. Pretty inexpensive to set up if you factor power to $ ratio. In any event any of these will make a ton of power on a basically stock engine.



Quick Reply: First LS build 67 Skylark



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 PM.