Cam only +1000ft da...
#1
Cam only +1000ft da...
Just wanted to show that good times can be made without -DA...track prep was average not great by any means, they only spray the track once at opening and that is it for the rest of the night for Test & Tune
my first run was the only one i got to hook halfway decent, plus my tires are shot ...
my first run was the only one i got to hook halfway decent, plus my tires are shot ...
#3
i may have added a little something...
got the ported 92 on there now...i had to see if it helped or not since my dyno numbers came up 409hp 373tq a loss of 13hp and 21tq
so how much the fast helped is a guess but comparing it to another time when i ran in 800ft da it went 121mph...so i would say it was worth around 10rwhp give or take...dont know how much tq i lost cause the prep wasnt there to compare what the 60fts...
good eye though...
got the ported 92 on there now...i had to see if it helped or not since my dyno numbers came up 409hp 373tq a loss of 13hp and 21tq
so how much the fast helped is a guess but comparing it to another time when i ran in 800ft da it went 121mph...so i would say it was worth around 10rwhp give or take...dont know how much tq i lost cause the prep wasnt there to compare what the 60fts...
good eye though...
#4
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats!
Corrected to 0' DA you would have run a 10.83@123.39 with a slower 60'. It
looks as though the ported 92 helped with the MPH, but not much in the ET.
5:40 PM time of run.
62*
37% hum
29.93 bar
680' US 41 track elev.
= 1116' DA
Corrected to 0' DA = 10.83@123.39mph
Corrected to 0' DA you would have run a 10.83@123.39 with a slower 60'. It
looks as though the ported 92 helped with the MPH, but not much in the ET.
5:40 PM time of run.
62*
37% hum
29.93 bar
680' US 41 track elev.
= 1116' DA
Corrected to 0' DA = 10.83@123.39mph