Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Schedule 10 1.5" vs 16 gauge 1.75" for headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2010, 09:57 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
Rick_Vor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Schedule 10 1.5" vs 16 gauge 1.75" for headers

Is Stainless Steel Schedule 10 1.5" (inside diameter 1.68", wall thickness .109") worth the added weight and expense over Stainless Steel 16 gauge 1.75" piping (inside diameter 1.63", wall thickness .061") for building a set of twin turbo headers? It seems that added thickness would retain heat better and handle heat cyclings better but is it worth the extra $$$.

By the way, this is for a DD forged 370 twin kit, shooting for a max of 16-18lbs boost.

Rick

Last edited by Rick_Vor; 01-19-2010 at 08:15 AM.
Old 01-19-2010, 06:07 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

For longevity and durability on the road I think so. And also what you said about retaining heat while supporting weight (turbo). W/ a turbo they are pressure manifolds, heat cycles and pressure take a toll on thinner stainless. With heat the amount of pressure it takes to stress stainless significantly drops. If not made correct they are prone to cracking especially with the weight of a turbo dangling on them.. Unless you get a well engineered set of tube headers (16ga) and a well braced turbo and are concerned about weight I would use the sch 10 for sure. That is what I use. I dont know where you found it more expensive but the sch 10 (304) fittings ive always found at like half the price as the 16ga tubing elbows. Tubing is always more expesive than piping cause they are bent, the pipe fittings are cast as is. McMaster.com has them. Also there would be no reason to use a better grade than 304 in my opinion
Old 01-19-2010, 03:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
Rick_Vor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pwrtrip75
what I use. I dont know where you found it more expensive but the sch 10 (304) fittings ive always found at like half the price as the 16ga tubing elbows.
I haven't done a ton a research on the pricing but looking at some pricing on a non-vendor site, a 16 gauge 304 1.75" U/J madrel bend is $62 and gives you 2 90's, 1 45 and 26" instraight pipe. Using the same vendor, 2 90's, 1 45 and 24" on 1.5" Schedule 10 runs $110.

Rick
Old 01-19-2010, 03:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Personally i would just do 16ga and have a bracket to support the turbo for sure.
Old 01-19-2010, 03:58 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
wilson34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are you running a log setup or header setup?
Old 01-19-2010, 04:03 PM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
wilson34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you look for it in Mcmaster Carr their 90 and 45 bends are only a little under 8 dollars a piece, and a 1 foot runs 20 dollars for schedule 10
Old 01-19-2010, 04:20 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The import scene is full of Sch 10 304L headers and mainfolds. Heaver weight, thicker material, and a root and cover pass.

I personaly use 16ga 304L tube. No need in the added weight. I have never had anything come back due to cracking. I do tell my customers that it is always going to be a possibility though. I dont care who welds it. The heavier turbos get braced to help prevent any issues.

It all comes down to what you are comfortable with welding and using.
Old 01-19-2010, 04:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
CarsandWomen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: houston TX
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can also have them stressed before you put em on too, its known in the welding industry as a Post Weld Heat Treat. the welding process leaves the metals under a lot of stress because of the rapid ramp times temperature wise, then when you start heat cycling them with a 15 or 20 pound turbo hanging on them that stress pulls the weld apart.

make them from what you want then take them to a heat treat facility, tell them all the matierial types, and they should be able to stress them no problem. The stress period is strictly controlled ramp up, soak time and temp, and ramp down, and relieves all the stress in the subjected areas. this is what im doing with my hot sides, only differance with me is my work has 2 furnaces and our Metallurgical Engineer is a hot rodder lol.

Any time you hear somebody say Nodular steel or naturlized steel, its been stressed.
Old 01-19-2010, 05:21 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'm using the thick pipe stuff on my new headers. I believe mine is 1.7" ID though.
Old 01-19-2010, 05:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
Rick_Vor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wilson34
Are you running a log setup or header setup?
Header set up.

Originally Posted by wilson34
If you look for it in Mcmaster Carr their 90 and 45 bends are only a little under 8 dollars a piece, and a 1 foot runs 20 dollars for schedule 10
That makes it pretty even regarding cost. Thanks for the info.
Old 01-19-2010, 06:20 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
russian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
I'm using the thick pipe stuff on my new headers. I believe mine is 1.7" ID though.
its 1.680 i rounded up
Old 01-19-2010, 06:43 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
Rick_Vor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Josh@KY-Turbo
The import scene is full of Sch 10 304L headers and mainfolds. Heaver weight, thicker material, and a root and cover pass.

I personaly use 16ga 304L tube. No need in the added weight. I have never had anything come back due to cracking. I do tell my customers that it is always going to be a possibility though. I dont care who welds it. The heavier turbos get braced to help prevent any issues.

It all comes down to what you are comfortable with welding and using.

Do you see any benefit to reducing spooling times by the heavier piping having better heat retention?

Last edited by Rick_Vor; 01-20-2010 at 08:19 PM.
Old 01-19-2010, 07:04 PM
  #13  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Rick_Vor;12772854]
Originally Posted by Josh@KY-Turbo
The import scene is full of Sch 10 304L headers and mainfolds. Heaver weight, thicker material, and a root and cover pass.

I personaly use 16ga 304L tube. No need in the added weight. I have never had anything come back due to cracking. I do tell my customers that it is always going to be a possibility though. I dont care who welds it. The heavier turbos get braced to help prevent any issues.QUOTE]

Do you see any benefit to reducing spooling times by the heavier piping having better heat retention?
I think if both cars are warmed up, are both are heat wrapped, you won't have a noticible difference. I just think the thick stuff is good for "peace of mind".
Old 01-19-2010, 09:29 PM
  #14  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
wilson34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I was running a header setup I would run just old regular 16ga, and if I ran say a large 40 some lb turbo I would brace it. Regardless since you sound like you are building your own, if you do run into some cracks, you will be able to fix it on your own
Old 01-19-2010, 09:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rick_Vor
I haven't done a ton a research on the pricing but looking at some pricing on a non-vendor site, a 16 gauge 304 1.75" U/J madrel bend is $62 and gives you 2 90's, 1 45 and 26" instraight pipe. Using the same vendor, 2 90's, 1 45 and 24" on 1.5" Schedule 10 runs $110.

Rick
WOW! Ya thats high.


Originally Posted by wilson34
If you look for it in Mcmaster Carr their 90 and 45 bends are only a little under 8 dollars a piece, and a 1 foot runs 20 dollars for schedule 10
^what he said exactly.. I never put a root and a cover on them though, you dont really need to when welding 1/8 thick stuff. And its not like it has to pass x-ray specs. One of my whole headers all the way to the front weighs similar to an exhaust manifold. Might be overkill, but its not going to break....and it supports the weight of the turbo all by itself. With all 4 tubes tied together it is very strong.

http://www.mcmaster.com/#45735k215/=5g82yt

Part number - 45735K215
Thin-Wall 304/304L SS Butt-Weld Pipe Fitting Unthreaded, 1-1/2" 90 Deg Long Radius Elbow, Sch 10
In stock at $7.52 Each



Quick Reply: Schedule 10 1.5" vs 16 gauge 1.75" for headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.