Pics of LS1 F-Body with roots style blower mounted
#1
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
Pics of LS1 F-Body with roots style blower mounted
Hi John,
Here are a couple pics of the supercharger project, these pictures are very “in Progress”, and several items are not hooked up yet. The supercharger is physically mounted in place, and I have enough clearance under the cowl, that the windshield wipers are not going to be affected, and will operate properly. I am currently trying to resolve the air intake situation, I was hoping to be able to use one of the current aftermarket “Lids” available, but I’m not sure if that will work out or not.
It’s not in place in these photos, but the kit will include a metal panel that bonds into place where I have cut the cowl. Everything stays very ridgid, and does not flex, even when the wipers are on. I didn’t have to do major cutting, the piece I removed was about 4”x8”, the new piece will be different shaped, but fit exactly in the opening, and is held in place by a very strong epoxy, that will also be included. The original black plastic panel will need to be trimmed to fit, and re-installed which should give a nice finished look. The hood is the next big hurdle, since I am trying to stay away from requiring a new hood. I am pretty confident that I can modify the factory hood to work, and should have it finished in the next few days
I’ve still got a few things to figure out, but it is getting close to being up and running. This is the Non-I/C blower, so I anticipate being able to make 5-6PSI, which should be good for close to 400RWHP, the test car is a 1998 Z28 A/T.
I also plan to do a 6 speed Trans Am with an I/C Magnuson next, so I can verify any differences between the A/T and M/T cars.
Thanks for the support, I’ll keep you posted with any updates
Here are a couple pics of the supercharger project, these pictures are very “in Progress”, and several items are not hooked up yet. The supercharger is physically mounted in place, and I have enough clearance under the cowl, that the windshield wipers are not going to be affected, and will operate properly. I am currently trying to resolve the air intake situation, I was hoping to be able to use one of the current aftermarket “Lids” available, but I’m not sure if that will work out or not.
It’s not in place in these photos, but the kit will include a metal panel that bonds into place where I have cut the cowl. Everything stays very ridgid, and does not flex, even when the wipers are on. I didn’t have to do major cutting, the piece I removed was about 4”x8”, the new piece will be different shaped, but fit exactly in the opening, and is held in place by a very strong epoxy, that will also be included. The original black plastic panel will need to be trimmed to fit, and re-installed which should give a nice finished look. The hood is the next big hurdle, since I am trying to stay away from requiring a new hood. I am pretty confident that I can modify the factory hood to work, and should have it finished in the next few days
I’ve still got a few things to figure out, but it is getting close to being up and running. This is the Non-I/C blower, so I anticipate being able to make 5-6PSI, which should be good for close to 400RWHP, the test car is a 1998 Z28 A/T.
I also plan to do a 6 speed Trans Am with an I/C Magnuson next, so I can verify any differences between the A/T and M/T cars.
Thanks for the support, I’ll keep you posted with any updates
#4
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
That is stock height.
Tony did 500rwhp non I/C with heads and cam and 9:1 compression so I think a non I/C will fly but certainly an I/C is nice. But it will push the blower up higher I think.
Tony did 500rwhp non I/C with heads and cam and 9:1 compression so I think a non I/C will fly but certainly an I/C is nice. But it will push the blower up higher I think.
#7
Originally Posted by Evil F1 SS
All this to mount a blower that can barley feed a h/c motor?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eviltwins
Exactly what I was thinking. 500 RWHP and these are taking a **** on the cobra guys, why would anyone want to buy one? Maybe if it were an intercooled 3.3L whipple I would think about it, but not as they sit.
Even a 2.3L kb or 2.4 L whippkle can support 700 rwhp. and would fit in the same place the eaton would. I just cant see using this blower!
#9
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
That is stock height.
Tony did 500rwhp non I/C with heads and cam and 9:1 compression so I think a non I/C will fly but certainly an I/C is nice. But it will push the blower up higher I think.
Tony did 500rwhp non I/C with heads and cam and 9:1 compression so I think a non I/C will fly but certainly an I/C is nice. But it will push the blower up higher I think.
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are people that are leery about cutting their hoods to clearance their blower, do you think people are willing to cut open their cowl? I don't think so. Its a nice idea but I just don't see a lot of people going for it.
#13
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sleepy Hollow, NY
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think this magnacharger project is pretty exciting - I hope the project will work out.
I consider 450-500RWHP as pretty attractive, especially with
the torque coming on strong down low
Gert
I consider 450-500RWHP as pretty attractive, especially with
the torque coming on strong down low
Gert
#15
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Tony did 500rwhp non I/C with heads and cam and 9:1 compression so I think a non I/C will fly but certainly an I/C is nice. But it will push the blower up higher I think.
That cowl cut is minimal, I'd definitely do that for a blower. Looks easier than some of us beating in the floorboards to accomodate a Y-pipe
If some of you think 500 rwhp and 500 ft-lbs isn't fun for a street car, put down the pipe! My setup is making over 400 ft-lbs.....at only 2000 rpm.
#17
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Got Me SOM
There are people that are leery about cutting their hoods to clearance their blower, do you think people are willing to cut open their cowl? I don't think so. Its a nice idea but I just don't see a lot of people going for it.
More for the rest of us...
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
How much will this make on a H&C car?I'm thinking of going to a 6.0L head to drop comp. and go with a turbo. This kit would have to make 200rwhp over what the H&C guys already make for us to buy it. A 100rwhp gain for the amount of money it is going to cost is just not worth it. Could make 100 rwhp cheap and easy with nos. We need atleast 200 hp for the H&C guys to be all over it
#20
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Oh I might be wrong about Tony's, I'm sure he will be by at some point.
Gordon, not everyone is looking for 600-800rwhp.
Gordon, not everyone is looking for 600-800rwhp.
Its still nice to have room to grow... The twin screw's would make more power at the same boost with less heat. So even at 500 rwhp there would be less heat and the motor would last longer.
People who buy economy cars dont want 200 hp but why use a flat head ford v8 when there is a DOCh 4 cyl?