Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Unconventional Cam Choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2007, 06:56 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Juiced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Unconventional Cam Choices

Lets look beyond the normal z06 and 22X cam selection for FI Cars, have any of the BIG guys run large split pattern cams like a 230/242 or larger 114.5 lsa to get those huge turbo's to breath up top?

Everything i have learned in thermodynamics, and Engine Theory (as well as some real expensive engine simulators) tell me that it'll make more power and carry better with more exhaust duration to get all those gasses out and turning the turbo.

Besides it's only 8* overlap......
Old 02-01-2007, 07:39 PM
  #2  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 17,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my blower cam is a 224/236 split
Old 02-01-2007, 09:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (13)
 
Navy David SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Mines a custom grind. 24X/24X 64X/61X 114. All cams will vary on engine, boost, goal. IMO call a cam shop and get your's for your application -- W2W did mine.

David
Old 02-01-2007, 10:29 PM
  #4  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I just ordered a custom grind through Stenod....BIG:

24x 23x, 64x, 61x on a 114.

They picked a bigger one for me at first but it was made for 7500ish rpms and that was just a little scary for me running 18-20psi. The cam they made for me shold be good to shift around 7k or 7200.
Old 02-02-2007, 08:28 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
TNTramair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ne philly
Posts: 2,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what would you gentleman recommend for a D1-sc set up on a forged 402...l92/l76. im lookin to make 650ish on pump gas. I was lookin for something along the lines of 23x/23x...595/.598 on a 115lsa??? thanx for the input.
Old 02-02-2007, 09:43 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
WickedC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove Village Il
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 02-02-2007, 11:30 AM
  #7  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Why kill the car with a big cam ? Making a rev happy turbo motor, doesnt necessarily make it any faster than a smaller cammed motor, that drives well everywhere, and still produces the goods.
Old 02-02-2007, 11:32 AM
  #8  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I am running a 236/245//598//608//115 on a 402 with a F1-R.

Keith
Old 02-02-2007, 12:11 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Maybe I mis-understood the question, but I thought he was looking for Turbo guys running split pattern cams. Just about everyone runs a split patter on a blower.

I'm running a 224/236-114 with my T76GTS / 388 LTx combo. I tried a 226/226-114 cam and was unhappy with the results, so I put the old "blower cam" back in. Since I've gone 146 mph in the quarter on 17 psi boost at 3750 lb using a log header, I tend to think the cam's not hurting me.

Mike
Old 02-02-2007, 12:18 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Was there really a marked difference between the 2 cams ?

Id say the extra duration, and possibly overlap would be more likely to hurt a log setup, than a decent tubular setup.

TBH, and Ive said this before, with boost and tuning.....unless cam choices are extremely bad, pretty much most small-mild cams, will have the ability produce excellent power everywhere.

Big cams may have some ability to make good power at the top end, and also the ability to kill it everywhere else off boost.
Old 02-02-2007, 12:38 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Was there really a marked difference between the 2 cams ?
I have alot of evidence, but unfortunately no solid scientific tests. Based on the data I have, I estimate that the 224/236 cam made about 20 rwhp more than the 226/226 at 11 psi boost, and the difference grew to about 40 rwhp difference at 18 psi. Again, I have about 70% confidence in these numbers since some other things changed. I can give all the details of my testing if you want.

Most people believe that a reverse-split is needed when you have alot of backpressure and/or a log header, but I have seen zero dyno evidence that this is true. In fact, the opposite may be true. I do know that Cam Motion really pushes the reverse-split turbo cams and when you press them for a reason why, they start blowing smoke.

I would really like to add something like 12 deg overlap just to see how bad overlap really is on a turbo motor. The new cam would be something like 230/242-111. It would be really interesting to see once and for all how that extra overlap would compare to my 224/236-114.

Mike
Old 02-02-2007, 12:42 PM
  #12  
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
kp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

This 222/228 cam I have in my car went 124mph in the 1/8 with the a twin T67 346. Only thing you can do is try it and see what happens - you will find that your tuning knowledge and overall combination will outweigh a few degrees duration here and there on a camshaft
Old 02-02-2007, 12:48 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (17)
 
motorbuilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you guys think of reverse splits on turbo cars with well flowing heads?
Old 02-02-2007, 12:54 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kp
you will find that your tuning knowledge and overall combination will outweigh a few degrees duration here and there on a camshaft
I agree that if I had a trans-brake and your suspension and weight, I would be in the 8's right now. But, the engineer in me likes to extract every bit of available power out of the engine rather than make the car launch.
Old 02-02-2007, 12:56 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by motorbuilt
What do you guys think of reverse splits on turbo cars with well flowing heads?
I don't think a reverse-split cam has a place on anything with less than 4 valves per cylinder. Yes, there are fast cars with reverse-splits, but I truly believe they are fast in spite of the reverse-split, rather than because of it.
Old 02-02-2007, 01:31 PM
  #16  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

How does your boost vs EGBP compare Mike ? with both cams may be interesting ?
Old 02-02-2007, 01:35 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
How does your boost vs EGBP compare Mike ? with both cams may be interesting ?
I don't have numbers for the 226/226 cam, but with my current 224/236, I'm at 17 psi boost and 34 psi backpressure. I was as high as 48 psi backpressure until I changed the muffler from an Aerochamber to a Magnaflow.

Mike
Old 02-02-2007, 01:54 PM
  #18  
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
kp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I agree that if I had a trans-brake and your suspension and weight, I would be in the 8's right now. But, the engineer in me likes to extract every bit of available power out of the engine rather than make the car launch.
And if I had 20 more avg HP I'd be in the 8s too, but I'm giving up 50-60hp driving this blower lol.
Old 02-02-2007, 01:57 PM
  #19  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I don't have numbers for the 226/226 cam, but with my current 224/236, I'm at 17 psi boost and 34 psi backpressure. I was as high as 48 psi backpressure until I changed the muffler from an Aerochamber to a Magnaflow.

Mike
Holy crap.....that must be one seriously crap muffler !!!!!!

Was the 14psi change down to a muffler swap only ??
Old 02-02-2007, 02:19 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Why kill the car with a big cam ? Making a rev happy turbo motor, doesnt necessarily make it any faster than a smaller cammed motor, that drives well everywhere, and still produces the goods.
Why? Because Stenod and camotion seemed to think it was the best cam to get me fastest down the track.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.