General Maintenance & Repairs Leaks | Squeaks | Clunks | Rattles | Grinds

thermostat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2018, 01:54 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ttorres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default thermostat

Is it better to go with a 160 degree thermostat compared to a 180 degree stat? Are there any benefits to switching to a 160 degree stat? If so is it just plug and play or are there any other adjustments needed? thanks in advance.
Old 03-14-2018, 02:00 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I chose the 160 stat because I think it's the best choice for me. Not to cold, but just right. You'll want to have the fans reprogrammed to take full advantage as well
Old 03-14-2018, 03:05 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
 
BALLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,904
Received 87 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

typically people install a 160 stat so the PCM can then be tuned to have more timing thus more HP if running at a lower operating temp. Putting one in alone would not really do much other than open at 160 vs 185 degrees but if the fans are still stock on/off temp settings they will still come on & go off at those settings
Old 03-15-2018, 06:56 AM
  #4  
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
 
wssix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,667
Received 322 Likes on 295 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ttorres
Is it better to go with a 160 degree thermostat compared to a 180 degree stat?
What in your particular situation would lead you to think that you would get some benefit from switching from the stock configuration and spec?

Is there a problem you are looking to solve?
Old 03-15-2018, 07:48 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ttorres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

honestly I was just thinking it would be beneficial. I appreciate your advice. I'm just trying to improve the car as much as possible.
Old 03-15-2018, 03:01 PM
  #6  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,044
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

There is no benefit for a stock vehicle. And the benefit is debatable even for modified examples, depending on the degree and type of modifications (there is a ton of reading on this, you can investigate and decide for yourself as not everyone agrees).

Regardless, as mentioned above, you would need to reprogram the fans to get the full effect of this change.
Old 03-15-2018, 09:35 PM
  #7  
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
 
wssix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,667
Received 322 Likes on 295 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
There is no benefit for a stock vehicle.
+1. Automotive Engineers are good at optimizing this sort of thing. That's what they do...

On a stock car, this would throw off the fuel efficiency for no gain. A modified car could be a different story.
Old 03-15-2018, 09:46 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I agree on a stock setup it's not worth it. For a heads and cam high compression like mine it definitely was. We were able to add another degree of timing with no knock. Whereas before with the stock thermostat we could not
Old 03-16-2018, 11:59 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ttorres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my car is a 2002 camaro with prc head, mild cam,long tube headers with true duel exhaust with no cats. ls7 lifters, cold air intake. lowering springs with lower control arms with relocation brackets. ls7 clutch. upgraded fuel pump. I might be missing something not sure. I'm pushing about 420hp at the rear tires. i figured i would benefit with doing this. but Man thanks for all the input.
Old 03-16-2018, 01:51 PM
  #10  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,044
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ttorres
my car is a 2002 camaro with prc head, mild cam,long tube headers with true duel exhaust with no cats. ls7 lifters, cold air intake. lowering springs with lower control arms with relocation brackets. ls7 clutch. upgraded fuel pump. I might be missing something not sure. I'm pushing about 420hp at the rear tires. i figured i would benefit with doing this. but Man thanks for all the input.
The cooler temps would typically be more beneficial if compression was raised or boost was added, and/or you were using an intake that was subject to significant heat soak. Best power will usually be made when you have a cool air intake charge and a combustion chamber that's as hot as it can be without leading to detonation on an optimized tune.

All of my stock compression, NA LS1s with nylon intakes have usually performed best with 180°-187° t-stats and fan settings that keep coolant temps in the 190°-205° range (both stock and non-stock cam).




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.