FAST 102 or FAST 92 346/LS6 engine
#1
FAST 102 or FAST 92 346/LS6 engine
Ok...
I'm on the fence here. I initially wanted a FAST 92, but after looking at the cost, the FAST 102 is actually cheaper.
My delimea is....One day or if my motor blows I'm upgrading to the LS3.
Because of the expensive cost of these intakes, I'm considering re-sell value. I know the FAST 92 seems to be a better "re-seller", but the FAST 102 I'm told flows like a ported 92.
Do I compromise a few ponies to be able to re-sell it later? I have this feeling with the internet myths out there, re-selling a Cathedral 102 might be difficult....
I have an emission free 346, ported 243s, 228R cam, LT, true duals, Man trans.
Thoughts?
I'm on the fence here. I initially wanted a FAST 92, but after looking at the cost, the FAST 102 is actually cheaper.
My delimea is....One day or if my motor blows I'm upgrading to the LS3.
Because of the expensive cost of these intakes, I'm considering re-sell value. I know the FAST 92 seems to be a better "re-seller", but the FAST 102 I'm told flows like a ported 92.
Do I compromise a few ponies to be able to re-sell it later? I have this feeling with the internet myths out there, re-selling a Cathedral 102 might be difficult....
I have an emission free 346, ported 243s, 228R cam, LT, true duals, Man trans.
Thoughts?
#3
from what I have seen in testing the 102 intake makes 4 more hp then a 92mm intake with a 92mm TB.with the 102 you will need a ls2 fuel rails.I say stick with your current combo and save up for a ls3.
#5
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The stock ls1 fuel rails will not fit over the 102. You need the ls2 rails or aftermarket to make it work. And idk where this guy is getting only four horsepower but there is to many different combinations out there to put a number on it.. but ultimately the 102 intake brings more power in the end.
Trending Topics
#8
The stock ls1 fuel rails will not fit over the 102. You need the ls2 rails or aftermarket to make it work. And idk where this guy is getting only four horsepower but there is to many different combinations out there to put a number on it.. but ultimately the 102 intake brings more power in the end.
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
Fast 102 is cheaper? No. Easier to install? No. Gains over a 92 on a 346? Probably not.
Pretty sure a manifold is the same to install regardless of the opening size in the front.
Pretty sure a radical H/C 346 will benefit from having a 102 over a 92.
But hey, if it works for you it works for you.
#11
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are going to the ls3 set up later then just save your money. If you are really intent on changing your set up right now I would go with the 92 because you don't have to buy a new fuel rail to make it work.
#12
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your going to run a 92mm throttle body then why would you buy a 102 intake, your not gonna get any more air into the intake just because the opening is bigger, the 92mm can only flow so much. I would actually think it would be bad, air would be rushing through the 92mm opening then get into a bigger area in which the air would slow down (less pressure), I'm not sure if that is how that works but seems like that would make sense....
#16
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so what your saying the 92mm throttle body (which flows about 1200 cfm), will make more power because its going into a bigger intake? I feel like your not getting any more air into that intake... The motor is only going to use what it needs, yes, but I feel like gains would be minimal, if any, on a 346 that doesn't have a massive cam and a nice set of heads. You would lose out on low end torque as well, no?