Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best Priced FAST 92 TB??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2012, 07:14 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Best Priced FAST 92 TB??

Who has the best price on these???
Old 10-03-2012, 12:06 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
00'TwistedLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wentzville, MO
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when i bought mine i found ws6store to be on the very cheap side, wouldent say the cheapests but i was willing to go with them due to their great reputation and reliability
Old 10-03-2012, 01:33 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

cheapest would be hold out for a deal in the classifieds.
Old 10-03-2012, 02:25 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Why not just get a NW 92 TB for $50 less...?
Old 10-03-2012, 08:42 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
Why not just get a NW 92 TB for $50 less...?
I was thinking about it, but it wont seal on the fast 102
Old 10-03-2012, 09:09 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Bought one from Summit, $340 shipped
Old 10-04-2012, 08:56 AM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
 
01'SSLSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
I was thinking about it, but it wont seal on the fast 102
why would you put a 92mm TB on a 102mm intake?
Old 10-04-2012, 11:43 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01'SSLSX
why would you put a 92mm TB on a 102mm intake?
I was told in many threads, the 102 is tough to tune. Besides many people I know in racing that use the 102mm intake use the 92mm throttle body even on LS3 418 motors.
Old 10-04-2012, 04:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

FYI, You could go with a NW 102 TB for about $339.
http://www.ws6project.com/user_stor/...throttle-body/
Or...get a NW 95 TB...?
http://www.speedinc.com/catagory.cfm?catagory=Induction
Old 10-04-2012, 09:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
01'SSLSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ i agree with him, this is what I origanlly was going to recommend but my curiousity had to ask why first


Originally Posted by badazz81z28
I was told in many threads, the 102 is tough to tune. Besides many people I know in racing that use the 102mm intake use the 92mm throttle body even on LS3 418 motors.
if you have a compitant tuner it shouldnt matter, why make a bottle neck? i would use the same sizes
Old 10-05-2012, 12:30 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01'SSLSX
^^^ i agree with him, this is what I origanlly was going to recommend but my curiousity had to ask why first




if you have a compitant tuner it shouldnt matter, why make a bottle neck? i would use the same sizes


I agree, the 92mm is a bottleneck in the system...but the real bottleneck is really the MAF....Granted my 85mm MAF can swallow the stock LS1 MAF, its smaller than the TB.



Quick Reply: Best Priced FAST 92 TB??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.