What does your March pulley look like?
#1
What does your March pulley look like?
I got this March fluid dampened pulley directly from March (PN 4521), and it doesn't look how I expected it to look. This might be stupid, but if it's fluid dampened, shouldn't I hear some liquid floating around in there too? Post up a pic if you've got one (I dont have a digital cam any more).
#2
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
This might be stupid, but if it's fluid dampened, shouldn't I hear some liquid floating around in there too?
#3
Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Not necessarily, the fluid might be packed in there real tight, only working/functioning once installed and spinning at higher rpms, maybe?
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by 88ls1blazer
if i recall this is a very very very thick fluid, so you would never hear or feel it move around, think molasses at -100 degrees
#10
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
- it's pretty freakin heavy too. I can't imagine how much the stocker weighs!
You can find pics of the March (and ASP) on Thunder's site I think.
#12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I talked to March about the pulley wondering asking if i could heat it up to install it and how it was fluid dampened. They said that if i heated it up it might change the viscocity of the oil. So as far as i know it a type of oil in there so its probably pretty thick.
Kyle
Kyle
#13
Originally Posted by LS1LT1
I heard it weighs roughly the same as the stock one, that's why I got the lighter ASP. It's still well balanced, SFI Approved and is less weight (off the nose of the car too).
You can find pics of the March (and ASP) on Thunder's site I think.
You can find pics of the March (and ASP) on Thunder's site I think.
#15
Originally Posted by mdblackz28
i just don't see how the heavier march pulley can net better gains than the lighter asp.
#17
11 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrencher
A crank shaft endures alot of flex & harmonics while running. The dampner helps quench them, do you think less mass will help that?
Believe it or not I swear I could feel the car reving more smoothly between 5500 & 6600 rpm's. If I'm not careful I easily bang off the rev limiter, where as before I always found myself wanting to shift early because the motor felt like it was straining over 6k. Who knows, maybe my stock pulley could have been slightly out of balance but we'll never know because I'm keeping the March on there.
#18
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The stocker & the March are real close in weight, thats what I put in my car. Been in for almost a year (got one of the first) no problems. Most others are light-weight small pulleys. Not the place to look for weight savings IMHO.
#19
TECH Fanatic
so it sounds to me like if you want some added insurance to help the longevitty of your
motor you should get a MARCH ....
but if you are just looking for an extra 10hp and possibly harming your crank , get the ASP. which has NO extra dampning...
motor you should get a MARCH ....
but if you are just looking for an extra 10hp and possibly harming your crank , get the ASP. which has NO extra dampning...
#20
Originally Posted by M6HuggerSS
so it sounds to me like if you want some added insurance to help the longevitty of your
motor you should get a MARCH ....
but if you are just looking for an extra 10hp and possibly harming your crank , get the ASP. which has NO extra dampning...
motor you should get a MARCH ....
but if you are just looking for an extra 10hp and possibly harming your crank , get the ASP. which has NO extra dampning...