LS6 Intake or Catback?
03-29-2006, 07:09 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Desoto, Tx
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS6 Intake or Catback? With mods listed, which one would be more effective? Also, on the EGR and AIR fittings, what would I disconnect/block off after the install since I no longer need the EGR tube into the intake? Would appreciate it.
Blake
Blake
03-29-2006, 07:35 PM
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would do LS6 intake and save money for LTs, y pipe, and cutout and keep stock exhaust( this way you look stock). Cat backs are good for maybe 5rwhp. You'll see more gains for your$$$ if you put that towards LTs from texas speed for 500 including off road y.
03-29-2006, 07:45 PM
#5
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GR33N GoblinM6
i dunno.. you're pushing a LOT of HP with those painted red calipers, STB and cut springs.. you sure you're ready for this? 
go cat back.. its your biggest restriction so far. no point in getting more air in if you cant get it out faster
go cat back.. its your biggest restriction so far. no point in getting more air in if you cant get it out faster
Trending Topics
03-29-2006, 11:01 PM
#11
Gotta agree with the majority! Get the catback. You'll get horsepower increase with both mods but i got to have a mean sounding car and you dont get that with an intake. Like it was mentioned get yourself some headers and a decent y pipe in the future also. Now dont get me wrong definitly get a good intake in the future as well. The LS6 is a good one but if you got the cash and in the future if your planning on a cam and heads save for a FAST intake.
