Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Milled 317 heads, or LS6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2008, 12:29 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (63)
 
Unertl42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Milled 317 heads, or LS6?

I'm looking at getting some new heads, and am trying to decide between milled 317's or 243's. I can get the 317's cheap, and I'll get them milled down to 66 cc. This is my dd, so my goal is to keep low end power. I'm planning on installing Vengeance Racing's VRX3 cam, and so I was trying to figure out what would give me the best results.
Thanks
Old 10-13-2008, 01:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

definitely the 243s
Old 10-13-2008, 01:58 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (118)
 
snake charmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The south
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

+1 the 243s are a good investment . have had nothing but good results with them .
Old 10-13-2008, 04:56 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

both heads flow close to the same but unless you get the 317s dirt cheap id go 243....if you can get the 317s really cheap...go that route power will be close to the same...
Old 10-14-2008, 01:26 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
both heads flow close to the same but unless you get the 317s dirt cheap id go 243....if you can get the 317s really cheap...go that route power will be close to the same...
Please read OP post before posting. That is exactly waht OP wants to hear but is not fact.

Although a 317 is basicaly same runner design as a 243 it has 72cc chambers instead of 65cc on stock 243.
So by milling to 65cc, yes you would get similar results, EXCEPT you now are limited on the cam size you can fit under there because of the mill.

7cc mill is .042 mill and loss in piston valve clearance.
Old 10-14-2008, 10:30 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
definitely the 243s
+2.
Old 10-14-2008, 02:57 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default I read his post

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Please read OP post before posting. That is exactly waht OP wants to hear but is not fact.

Although a 317 is basicaly same runner design as a 243 it has 72cc chambers instead of 65cc on stock 243.
So by milling to 65cc, yes you would get similar results, EXCEPT you now are limited on the cam size you can fit under there because of the mill.

7cc mill is .042 mill and loss in piston valve clearance.
uhh i read his post...and he only needs .030 to get the 66cc chamber thar he said he would mill them to...the 317s have a 71cc chamber...the never said he wanted the heads milled to match the 243 chamber....ive purchased 317 heads for 200 bucks hell ive seen them go cheaper....around here it costs 25 bucks a head to get them milled....the cheapest ive seen 243s go for is around 400 a set...

just because someone doesnt share your opinoin doesnt meen you have to be an *** about it....
Old 10-14-2008, 03:00 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

oh and there is this new thing called fly cutting....
Old 10-14-2008, 05:10 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
uhh i read his post...and he only needs .030 to get the 66cc chamber thar he said he would mill them to...the 317s have a 71cc chamber...the never said he wanted the heads milled to match the 243 chamber....ive purchased 317 heads for 200 bucks hell ive seen them go cheaper....around here it costs 25 bucks a head to get them milled....the cheapest ive seen 243s go for is around 400 a set...

just because someone doesnt share your opinoin doesnt meen you have to be an *** about it....
So tell me since I'm the smart ***, what are the benefits from a 66cc 317 or stock 241s? since he has a 2001? 1cc bump in compression? That is how many Hp?

Your answer is still ill advice, what he needs is to know which will benefit him more, and the answer is still 243s, I said 317s were "similar" but not identical. Catch my drift?
Old 10-14-2008, 09:34 PM
  #10  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
just because someone doesnt share your opinoin doesnt meen you have to be an *** about it....
He did say "please"...

He is right though. Milling is gonna eat up valuable piston-valve clearance and flycutting will only weaken the cast pistons, not to mention expose the engine to metal debris if done in the car. Why do all that just to jerry-rig some heads to work, when you can just do the 243 route and be able to mill more later.

I'd go for the LS6 heads, that way you have the option to mill more later and get those nifty valves.
Old 10-15-2008, 02:43 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

guys i did say that unless the 317s were dirt cheap to go 243......yes the 243 is abetter head i think it flows about 15cfm more on intake and a little more exhaust.....bothg 317 and 243 flow better than any stock ls1 head.......

honestly i wouldnt do either 5.3 all the way....
Old 10-15-2008, 08:51 PM
  #12  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5_02ls1
honestly i wouldnt do either 5.3 all the way....
Old 10-16-2008, 06:23 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

^^I hear you^^
Old 10-16-2008, 08:55 AM
  #14  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Definately look to the LS6 heads over the 317 heads. Predator is exactly correct. Giving up .040" of clearance to make a 317 fit on the head is not worth it at all. On top of that the chambers are setup for different bores.

Look to someone with a good cnc ported LS6 head & you'll have a 40hp gain for right about $1000 or so. We sell PRC LS6 heads that can except upto .020" of milling & still keep stock piston to valve clearance!!

http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=649&catid=20
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com



Quick Reply: Milled 317 heads, or LS6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 PM.