Milled 317 heads, or LS6?
Thanks
Although a 317 is basicaly same runner design as a 243 it has 72cc chambers instead of 65cc on stock 243.
So by milling to 65cc, yes you would get similar results, EXCEPT you now are limited on the cam size you can fit under there because of the mill.
7cc mill is .042 mill and loss in piston valve clearance.
Although a 317 is basicaly same runner design as a 243 it has 72cc chambers instead of 65cc on stock 243.
So by milling to 65cc, yes you would get similar results, EXCEPT you now are limited on the cam size you can fit under there because of the mill.
7cc mill is .042 mill and loss in piston valve clearance.
just because someone doesnt share your opinoin doesnt meen you have to be an *** about it....
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
just because someone doesnt share your opinoin doesnt meen you have to be an *** about it....
Your answer is still ill advice, what he needs is to know which will benefit him more, and the answer is still 243s, I said 317s were "similar" but not identical. Catch my drift?

He is right though. Milling is gonna eat up valuable piston-valve clearance and flycutting will only weaken the cast pistons, not to mention expose the engine to metal debris if done in the car. Why do all that just to jerry-rig some heads to work, when you can just do the 243 route and be able to mill more later.
I'd go for the LS6 heads, that way you have the option to mill more later and get those nifty valves.
honestly i wouldnt do either 5.3 all the way....
Look to someone with a good cnc ported LS6 head & you'll have a 40hp gain for right about $1000 or so. We sell PRC LS6 heads that can except upto .020" of milling & still keep stock piston to valve clearance!!
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=649&catid=20
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com






