Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ARE 4.8 Liter Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2003, 09:31 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ARE 4.8 Liter Heads

Just Had the very 1st set of 4.8 Liter Stage II heads installed at ARE. A new design of Wade's. Went 10.76 @ 125.64 with a 1.433 at 3350 lbs 1st time out. See Drag racing section for more details.
For those of you that know the ARE dyno never puts up huge dyno #'s but they run at the track. These #'s however I was very happy with.
HP = 431.7 and Torque was a whopping 468.5 through the mufflers, an A-4 and a strange 12 bolt.
Sure seems funny to run these #'s from other shops you need to make 475 RWHP Real #'s are proven at the track

Last edited by Silvr98z28; 12-07-2003 at 09:41 PM.
Old 12-07-2003, 09:49 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Uhhhh... 4.8 heads are the same as 5.3 heads. And your torque numbers are squed by your convertor. I hope you don't think that is what it really made. None the less, they are nice numbers and times.
Old 12-07-2003, 10:35 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Uhhhh... 4.8 heads are the same as 5.3 heads. And your torque numbers are squed by your convertor. I hope you don't think that is what it really made. None the less, they are nice numbers and times.
MMMM, No they are not exactly.
And as far as the skewed, I have had this convertor dynoed twice prior to this at much lower torque #'s.
Thanks though. I really appreciate all of the know it alls on the board.
BTW I only posted #'s for the "Dyno Queens". I personally don't give a ****. The times speak for themselves.

Last edited by Silvr98z28; 12-07-2003 at 10:42 PM.
Old 12-07-2003, 10:54 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,583
Received 1,432 Likes on 992 Posts

Default

Could you post the graph?
Old 12-07-2003, 11:19 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (8)
 
VSGLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can you enlighten us to the exact diferences between the 4.8/5.3 heads. Do you know whats new about these heads? They seem to be working very well. Thanks.
Old 12-07-2003, 11:19 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silvr98z28
MMMM, No they are not exactly.
And as far as the skewed, I have had this convertor dynoed twice prior to this at much lower torque #'s.
Thanks though. I really appreciate all of the know it alls on the board.
BTW I only posted #'s for the "Dyno Queens". I personally don't give a ****. The times speak for themselves.
Then if you know the diffrence, why don't you tell us all. Funny how when I ordered 2 diffrent sets of 5.3 heads, they showed up with 4.8 stamped on them. Once again, if you have proof that they are diffrent, show me. As far as your torque, a stock bottom end car will not produce that kinda number, espeacially not that much higher than your HP, unless it is a stroker motor, then your HP is to low. Nobody said anything about being a know it all, I was just stating the obvious. I gave you props on your nice HP and track times, if you want to be an ***, then
Old 12-08-2003, 04:16 AM
  #7  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

were these locked or unlocked numbers? nice number, and damn what a ET MPH that is, I do beleive that number one heads and cam NA ET isnt it?
Old 12-08-2003, 07:23 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Beast96z, thanks for the props. Not trying to be a dick, just posting the #'s from the pulls which I was standing there for. As I said accurate or not these heads are running strong. No tricks were being performed.
The difference from a 5.3 is the chamber. I'll let Wade or Dave post up to tell you about them. If not, give them a call.
There is also more in it. I'd be happy to line up with Brent (Cartech's car) same weight same track
Yes #'s were locked.
Old 12-08-2003, 09:12 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey I have the FIRST ARE 5.3L heads

My numbers are decent too (See Sig)

hehe

Old 12-08-2003, 10:09 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
TVWilkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: RainbowCity,Alabama
Posts: 1,292
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

There is no difference in a 4.8 vs. a 5.3 head.From the factory they are all the same.
Old 12-08-2003, 10:18 AM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
SLED28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes the heads are the same, even chamber sizes. We are very pleased with the results! 10.7 H/C car is flying at close to 3400lbs. We do however install new bigger seats and valves (2.055/1.57). Re-shape and open up the cumbustion chamber. Also new one-piece bronze guides are installed.
Old 12-08-2003, 10:30 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for clearing up guys. Remember I'm no mechanic, just like going fast.
Old 12-08-2003, 11:18 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
 
JF WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silvr98z28
Beast96z, thanks for the props. Not trying to be a dick, just posting the #'s from the pulls which I was standing there for. As I said accurate or not these heads are running strong. No tricks were being performed.
The difference from a 5.3 is the chamber. I'll let Wade or Dave post up to tell you about them. If not, give them a call.
There is also more in it. I'd be happy to line up with Brent (Cartech's car) same weight same track
Yes #'s were locked.
So, you're saying your car made 468RWTQ with the convertor LOCKED on a stock bottom 346"? Sure!
Old 12-08-2003, 11:32 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JF WS6
So, you're saying your car made 468RWTQ with the convertor LOCKED on a stock bottom 346"? Sure!
Peak torque happens way before locking the converter genius.
Old 12-08-2003, 01:10 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
SPANKY LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Silvr98z28
For those of you that know the ARE dyno never puts up huge dyno #'s but they run at the track. These #'s however I was very happy with.
HP = 431.7 and Torque was a whopping 468.5 through the mufflers, an A-4 and a strange 12 bolt.
Sure seems funny to run these #'s from other shops you need to make 475 RWHP
The 475 rwhp numbers you talk about are an M6 car. You undoubtedly know that M6 cars out-dyno similarly modded A4 cars. You have to compare your times to other A4 times, if you're going to use dyno numbers as a measuring stick. Many a 320 rwhp A4 cars have smoked 400 rwhp M6 cars, it has nothing to do with the dyno numbers, it has everything to do with the fact that an A4 has a HUGE advantage at the track, both in the first 60 ft and down the 1/4 due to its favorable gearing, IMO.


Originally Posted by Silvr98z28
Real #'s are proven at the track
TSP ran 10.78@124 @ 3400+ lbs with about the same dyno numbers, and others in the 420+ rwhp range have also run 10s (A4). To "run" these numbers, you don't need 475 rwhp in an A4 car, your times are right there where they should be, congrats.

Shawn
Old 12-08-2003, 01:55 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Rich, Stiring the pot again
Old 12-08-2003, 02:21 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G2 LS1
Rich, Stiring the pot again
That's my job, that's what I do.
Old 12-08-2003, 02:39 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
 
JoSeY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Your Reality Check Bounced...
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that abnormaly high TQ number is the result of Torque Multiplication from the converter....My STOCK motor made 450rwtq on MTI's dyno....it's a 4000 Vig....but when u flash the converter on the dyno you "Trick" the dyno w/the torque multiplication....you have to get to 3rd gear and use a Tech 2 and lock the converter then nail it.....then u will get the TRUE Torque numbers..
Old 12-08-2003, 02:50 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
JF WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoSeY
that abnormaly high TQ number is the result of Torque Multiplication from the converter....My STOCK motor made 450rwtq on MTI's dyno....it's a 4000 Vig....but when u flash the converter on the dyno you "Trick" the dyno w/the torque multiplication....you have to get to 3rd gear and use a Tech 2 and lock the converter then nail it.....then u will get the TRUE Torque numbers..
Exactly...... but apparently Silver98Z knows it all, so you don't need to tell him that.
Old 12-08-2003, 09:43 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JF WS6
Exactly...... but apparently Silver98Z knows it all, so you don't need to tell him that.
Go back and read and you'll see that I stated that I really don't give a **** what the #'s are as long as they have improved. But ARE must be doing something right. I didn't make the heads, I just had the ability to pay for them. If your running the same or similar combo why don't you tell us all what you run.
Keep your #'s to yourself though because I really don't give a ****.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.