Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The beat to death connecting rod debate...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2010, 12:21 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RRhodes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton Alberta , Canada
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow The beat to death connecting rod debate...

is not what i am here to talk about


all i ask is for anyone with the ARP pro connecting rod bolts installed in their engine, to chime in and tell if they have had any problems, or if they would recommend them again. i know some think katechs are better. i have the ARPs in my hand however.


Regards,

RRhodes
Old 01-15-2010, 03:57 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I went with the Katechs, but either way if up grading the the motor to spin faster I would always recomend upgrading rodbolts. I did not go with the ARP bolts because of the chance of needing machine work to get them in right
Old 01-15-2010, 06:12 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
BTL FED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Katechs or Arp's shouldn't matter, neither would require machine work. I just went with Katech's because I think it is the cheapest Katech part I can have in my motor, and say "Ya I have some Katech parts in here "
Old 01-15-2010, 07:22 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
G Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: greensboro, nc
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO when it comes to fasteners no one beats ARP they set the standard and continue to better their products to remain the best. Any thing else is just a copy on the the real thing. So to answer your question Yes I would recommend the ARP pro rod bolts.
Old 01-15-2010, 11:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Im running ARPs, no issues.
Old 01-15-2010, 12:16 PM
  #6  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (73)
 
Brakemotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What year is the motor? The rob bolt design changed mid production, some have ferrules installed that need to be removed. I've used both Lingenfelter and Katech rod bolts without issue. The Katech bolts are beautifully crafted pieces, definitely nothing second rate about them.
Old 01-15-2010, 12:53 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

I left my ferrules or whatever you call them. No issue. Its nothing more then a spacer of sorts. I dont see what the big issue is with them anyway.
Old 01-15-2010, 02:04 PM
  #8  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (73)
 
Brakemotive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
I left my ferrules or whatever you call them. No issue. Its nothing more then a spacer of sorts. I dont see what the big issue is with them anyway.
I just followed the directions that came with the bolts Which is one reason why I went with the Katech's. It's not a mystery what the correct procedure is, it's laid out for you plain and simple.
Old 01-15-2010, 04:15 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BTL FED
Katechs or Arp's shouldn't matter, neither would require machine work. I just went with Katech's because I think it is the cheapest Katech part I can have in my motor, and say "Ya I have some Katech parts in here "
there is no such thing as a rod bolt upgrade that does not require machine work. just because people have put them in without resizing the rods and got away with it, doesnt make it right.
Old 01-16-2010, 01:25 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RRhodes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton Alberta , Canada
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its a 2000 LS1. no idea if it has a rod bolt spacers in there. im a machinist so i could prob. fab up some sort of a jig to get them out. Or are they really not that hard to get out with some wiggling and cussin?
Old 01-16-2010, 01:45 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RRhodes1
its a 2000 LS1. no idea if it has a rod bolt spacers in there. im a machinist so i could prob. fab up some sort of a jig to get them out. Or are they really not that hard to get out with some wiggling and cussin?
I did an 04 LQ4 and only one in the whole motor popped out. The other 15 were never seen, as they stayed in the rod caps. I noticed that the ferrule is a tight fit by the threads so you actually have to thread the bolts in and out of them. But once they reach the top shank of the bolt where there are no threads its a slightly loose fit. I dont really see how they hurt or help much of anything. On my motor I think only two came out with the old bolt so I just unscrewed them off the bolts threads and put them back in the cap.

Originally Posted by Brakemotive
I just followed the directions that came with the bolts Which is one reason why I went with the Katech's. It's not a mystery what the correct procedure is, it's laid out for you plain and simple.
I dont remember the ARPs saying anything about ferrules in there small instruction sheet.
Old 01-16-2010, 02:09 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RRhodes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton Alberta , Canada
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, over-looking the ARP install sheet i have here, it says nothing to indicate the removal of the ferrules. I guess i will end up removing mine (if they exist). It also appears that the dia. underneath the small radius of the bolt head, is bigger than the major dia. of the thread. i havent got out a mic to check yet, but if that is the case, i think it'd be indicitive that that larger dia. is meant to "fill in " the area that the ferrule's reside in. guess ill have to take a look.

Also, for those that have done the ARP install, did you just torque them, or did you do it by bolt stretch ?

For any who have done it via bolt stretch, what gauge will fit when the engine is stil in the car ?

just wondering if actually doing bolt strech method will be benifical, or just another PITA
Old 01-16-2010, 02:37 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (13)
 
Black_98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No problems when I had them in my old engine
Old 01-16-2010, 03:11 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Also, my ferrules were a loose fit inside the cap. Not like a press fit or anything. If the ARP bolt had a slight radius under the head to center it on the through hole, I dont see the ferrules interfering with that in any way.
Old 01-16-2010, 04:17 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
DarkJuggalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC / Ansonia,CT
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im goin with arp when i do mine
Old 01-16-2010, 04:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
bluethunder364's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a 2006 LQ-4 that suppose to have upgraded rod bolts, but I changed them anyway to the ARP ones. Followed the instructions to torque the required 3 times to stretch method with the proper lube on the threads and under the head. No issues thus far. I did call ARP and it was recommened to remove the furrels. Of course you could call back later and talk to someone different that says leave them in. Just make sure to do only one side of the cap at a time and follow the torque three time method if you don't have a stretch gage. I have had no issues with multiple runs @6800 down the 1320 Just my opinion.
Old 01-16-2010, 04:59 PM
  #17  
Teching In
 
disturbthepeace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did mine 20k ago along with a new pan gasket/o-ring and poly motor mounts. Not one issue yet..

I'm a firm believer that ARP only wants you to machine to cover there own ***.. I did some serious searching before I did do the mod and didnt find any engine failures directly linked to an ARP rod bolt installation..

Joe
Old 01-16-2010, 06:48 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RRhodes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Edmonton Alberta , Canada
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by disturbthepeace
I did mine 20k ago along with a new pan gasket/o-ring and poly motor mounts. Not one issue yet..

I'm a firm believer that ARP only wants you to machine to cover there own ***.. I did some serious searching before I did do the mod and didnt find any engine failures directly linked to an ARP rod bolt installation..

Joe

exactly, i have heard some say a hone, bore was a necesssity, however i am yet to find one instance on google, LS1tech etc. indicating a failure due to a rod bolt swap.


i think i will just do it this spring.

take one bolt out of each con rod per cylinder, swap torque to 40ft/lbs, turn engine by hand, torque again, turn by hand once more,final torque: repeat for the other 8, then check it all over once more before calling it a day


sounds correct?


Thanks to all who replied
Old 01-16-2010, 10:04 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

ARP didnt specify turning the engine over between torquing. And in all honesty, the rod caps are grooved so doing both bolts at the same time doesnt change how they are seated. I personally did both bolts at once, by putting in the ARPs and then alternating sides as I was going through the 3 time torque sequence. Seemed simpler to me this way.
Old 01-16-2010, 11:00 PM
  #20  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have actually measured the bore change from stock to ARP Pro Series. Less than .0001" in every case... usually less than half a tenth, and that is when I could detect a change. The powdered metal cracked cap rods are VERY resistant to distortion. You will NOT have any problems with a proper install. I've done them many, many times over the years. As a matter of fact, if I am changing the oil pump or timing set and the motor is out of the car, I automatically do it for any build that will see over 6600.

Shane

Last edited by XtraCajunSS; 01-16-2010 at 11:16 PM.


Quick Reply: The beat to death connecting rod debate...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.