Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stealth Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2004, 08:42 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
BLKKNIGHTWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stealth Cams

Does anyone know which MTI Stealth Cam would make more power with the bolt ons I already have?
Old 03-04-2004, 10:11 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
raceguy333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKKNIGHTWS.6
Does anyone know which MTI Stealth Cam would make more power with the bolt ons I already have?

I want to know also!
Old 03-05-2004, 08:29 AM
  #3  
Launching!
 
SloppyRob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe The stealth II cam will make slightly more power than the stealth I if thats what your asking.
Old 03-08-2004, 11:22 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
Gr8WhtLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stealth II, moron! It has more duration on the intake with a little less lift 224/220 instead of 220/220(known as a split pattern camshaft)so it idles great. Plus its on a 116LSA so it should idle smooth and be not so agressive sounding and make plenty of power(which is why MTI made it!) Good choice with the Stealth series, but you should check out the Thunder Racing "old MAN" cam 215/220 .600/.523 115 LSA Which is close to stock duration with more lift on a 115 LSA, it should make great power in the stock powerband and there is no tuning required(save$$) plus it will idle great, just dont forget to upgrade your springs! PASSER_BALL_STACKED
Old 03-11-2004, 03:57 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
ulySSes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

to the top
Old 03-11-2004, 04:00 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Stealth II = slightly more power than the Stealth I but makes for a slightly higher revving engine. The idle should be about the same. Maybe just a tiny bit smoother with the II.

The cams aren't that much different really.
Old 03-11-2004, 04:54 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
ulySSes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

GT2-3
207/220 .573/.580 118.5 LSA

VS

MTI's Stealth II cam
224/220 .576/.581 116 LSA

VS

TR's Old Man Cam
215/220 .600/.523 115 LSA


??????????????????????????????????

Old 03-11-2004, 05:03 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Power- Stealth, TR, GT2
Idle - GT2, TR, Stealth

However, how smooth is smooth when it comes to idle characteristics? There is only so smooth you can get. If ya can't tell, you can't tell. In other words, you don't have to have a 207 intake duration to be stealthy.
Old 03-11-2004, 07:15 PM
  #9  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Colonel - do you know what ICL that stealth II cam is on?

I think I remember from a long time ago that you (or someone else) posted that the cam was 2* retarded, but that might have been the original stealth or even the old man cam.
Old 03-11-2004, 07:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It's straight up, so is the SSI. So, 116 for the SSII.

I think the Old Man cam is -2 best I recall.
Old 03-11-2004, 08:49 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
JimmyY2KWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anybody has Dyno # with the MTI stealth II cam??

Jimmy
Old 03-11-2004, 08:57 PM
  #12  
Sweet Cheeks
iTrader: (7)
 
Damage Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hope we see some track times soon.
Old 03-11-2004, 09:46 PM
  #13  
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
BigTex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East of Dallas
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks Colonel. I think you are right on the -2 for the TR OMC. With its small intake duration, they retarded it to provide more upper rpms.

You have the SII cam right? How is the valvetrain noise on it? I assume with the high lift (especially the short exhaust XE-R lobe), that it would be a little loud.
Old 03-12-2004, 08:47 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
ulySSes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You probably wouldn't be able to tell unless you open the hood. Hopefully, one of our great sponsors will have a special on one of these cam packages. =)
Old 03-12-2004, 12:11 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
ulySSes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ulySSes
You probably wouldn't be able to tell unless you open the hood. Hopefully, one of our great sponsors will have a special on one of these cam packages. =)
Would anybody else be interested?
Old 03-12-2004, 04:57 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
JakeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Colonel
It's straight up, so is the SSI. So, 116 for the SSII.

I think the Old Man cam is -2 best I recall.
ever going to take that sound clip I asked about a few months back?

Cheers,

-J
Old 04-01-2004, 12:48 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
hpponline.net's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey im definetly interestd in getting a cam package. i just want it to sound stock but add some extra power. whatever would be best for that but i def need it to sound stock
Old 04-01-2004, 04:42 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Colonel, you had mentionned previously ion a thread that your cam Stealth II is 224/220, .581/.581 116 lsa. Yet at MTI it's advertised as 224/220, .571/.581 116 lsa. Is that a typo or did they variate on the one in your car? Could that be the reason that some of them lope more than yours.??
Old 04-01-2004, 09:08 AM
  #19  
Sweet Cheeks
iTrader: (7)
 
Damage Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good call, I was thinking that as well.
Old 04-01-2004, 10:03 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would be interested in a stealth cam package.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.