Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reverse Dome vs Flat Tops in an NA Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2015, 07:55 PM
  #1  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 140 Likes on 117 Posts

Default Reverse Dome vs Flat Tops in an NA Build

Just spurring some debate...

In an Naturally Aspirated motor, I realize there is some debate as to whether a dished piston is less than ideal for the flame front due to a lack of a quench area. However, the reverse domes with quench pad areas that mimic the combustion chamber seem like a good compromise. Does anyone have any data or real world experience with the difference in power (if any) between a reverse dome and a flat top?

If you're following my other current thread, you'll see that I'm considering using small bore heads with a tighter combustion chamber on a bigger motor. I want to know if it'd be worth it to soften the chambers or simply run a reverse dome piston to get compression where I want it.
Old 07-21-2015, 09:51 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
dckmn52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Spherical dish pistons and small cc chamber promote flame travel/ make power.
Check out a few of the Engine Masters engines. Sub 40cc chambers in the heads.
Old 07-21-2015, 09:59 PM
  #3  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 140 Likes on 117 Posts

Default

Then it would appear I'm on the right track.
Old 07-21-2015, 10:22 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dckmn52
Spherical dish pistons and small cc chamber promote flame travel/ make power.
Check out a few of the Engine Masters engines. Sub 40cc chambers in the heads.
This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
When the Busch series went from V6s to 9:1 V8s...they did not use a 76cc chamber and a flat top because the flame travel was smooth and even.
They quickly used a reverse dome and like 38cc chambers with 18 and then 15 degree heads
This combo magnified the compression turbulence and lowered the BSFC numbers
Old 07-22-2015, 10:35 AM
  #5  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 140 Likes on 117 Posts

Default

Good advice, Lonnie. Thanks!
Old 07-22-2015, 03:20 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
MMorgan9812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mars Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Always learn a lot from your topics Jake thanks!!
Old 07-22-2015, 05:10 PM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
carbuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

What heads are you considering for a small-chamber? I'm certainly not that knowledgable on the options out there, but I haven't stumbled onto any small chamber LS heads, outside of the C5R head.

What are the options for this type of combination? It's funny you started this thread, because I have wondered about this exact topic myself...
Old 07-22-2015, 05:59 PM
  #8  
Super Hulk Smash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 140 Likes on 117 Posts

Default

Running my heads ~ LS6 @ 62cc on a 418 with an 8cc reverse dome. Certainly not the same as a 38cc with a 20cc reverse dome or whatever NASCAR runs. But enough to push 12:1 CR... which is about the limit I'd want to mess with on 93 octane.
Old 07-22-2015, 06:22 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
carbuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Got it... By "small" I was referring to something in the 3x - 4x range. I'm at 12:1 myself with a 66cc chamber and 3cc piston. Just trying to learn about other available combinations...
Old 07-22-2015, 07:46 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,693
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Compared to a flat top, doesn't a dished piston offer more volumetric efficiency?
Old 07-23-2015, 07:55 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Usually the opposite. A dish has little to no quench area. Not really a big issue with FI as the boost aids the mixing.

I'd have to say that a reverse dome logically makes more sense in your case Jake. I'll probably be in the same boat once I swap out my bottom end. I'll probably have the Mamo 220's for a long time.
Old 07-25-2015, 11:02 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,693
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Exidous
Usually the opposite. A dish has little to no quench area. Not really a big issue with FI as the boost aids the mixing.

I'd have to say that a reverse dome logically makes more sense in your case Jake. I'll probably be in the same boat once I swap out my bottom end. I'll probably have the Mamo 220's for a long time.
Your response doesn't make sense. Volumemetric efficiency, the incoming charge, dished piston allows more. Not talking about quench at all.



Quick Reply: Reverse Dome vs Flat Tops in an NA Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.