Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

possibly a lifter collapsing, a question..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2005, 10:55 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
firechicken2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question possibly a lifter collapsing, a question..

my dyno looks sorta like a heart monitor

Matt @ TTP said it might be because a lifter (or a few from what i understand) might be collapsing.

Seems like everything is breaking around me..

So..

My question is - if it is in fact a lifter, what will happen if it will collapse as I am driving? will it damage anything, and take something with it?

I am just curious, cause I am broke right now, and dont have the money to tear into the engine.. I'd like to change at least a cam, hopefully heads too, while we'll be in the engine.. so saving up for that.

So. What will a collapsed lifter take with it, if anything, if I wait until it breaks before fixing it?
Old 06-10-2005, 08:27 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Demon_Speeding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I collapsed a few lifters on my old Chevelle, granted it was a Gen I 283cid motor. I wound up with a messed up exhaust valve on one of them. I don't think the lifter collapsing caused it though...It was more related to the fact of the valve sinking into the head. <--Non hardened valve seats.

I'd just watch my driving and keep the RPMs low.
Old 06-10-2005, 08:34 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
firechicken2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JsLS1
I collapsed a few lifters on my old Chevelle, granted it was a Gen I 283cid motor. I wound up with a messed up exhaust valve on one of them. I don't think the lifter collapsing caused it though...It was more related to the fact of the valve sinking into the head. <--Non hardened valve seats.

I'd just watch my driving and keep the RPMs low.
how do rpm's even matter, with a lifter?
correct me if i'm wrong, but camshaft's lobes move the lifter up and down.. doesn't really matter if you're going 2 mph or 200 mph - your lifters are working at pretty much the same rate
Old 06-10-2005, 10:15 AM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ArKay99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by firechicken2k
how do rpm's even matter, with a lifter?
correct me if i'm wrong, but camshaft's lobes move the lifter up and down.. doesn't really matter if you're going 2 mph or 200 mph - your lifters are working at pretty much the same rate
Inertia.
Old 06-10-2005, 11:01 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
firechicken2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArKay99
Inertia.
elaborate?
Old 06-10-2005, 03:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

As the engine turns faster the cam turns faster. As the revs increase the velocity at which the lifter follows the lobe increases. At peak lift the inertia mass of the lifter increases exponetially exerting more force on the valve spring which must control and dampen the inertia. RPM is not a friend to hyd roller lifters.

Chris
Old 06-10-2005, 04:10 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't forget the lash/preload clearances also get thrown out the window.

You may risk the chance of bending pushrods, breaking rockers, etc.

2 mph or 200 mph - your lifters are working at pretty much the same rate
That would be the difference of a lifter moving up and down at ~20 times per second, or 200+ times per second.

Which case would cause more damage if a lifter collapsed?

Force/Velocity explained:
http://othello.mech.northwestern.edu...h5/Sources.htm
Old 06-26-2005, 02:57 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
ls1powrdta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warren,Mi
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well how do know if you have collapsed lifter though without pulling off the heads?just wondering cause im thinking i may have one.
Old 06-26-2005, 03:41 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
spy2520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,513
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Adrenaline_Z
Don't forget the lash/preload clearances also get thrown out the window.

You may risk the chance of bending pushrods, breaking rockers, etc.


That would be the difference of a lifter moving up and down at ~20 times per second, or 200+ times per second.

Which case would cause more damage if a lifter collapsed?

Force/Velocity explained:
http://othello.mech.northwestern.edu...h5/Sources.htm
200+ times per second is kinda fast dont you think? Isnt it every crank rpm = half a cam rpm. At 6000rpms the cam should be spinning at 3000 rpms which would only allow for about 50 times per second. The range would be between 6 and 60 times per second, realistically. But you could have always just been exaggerating.
Old 06-26-2005, 04:35 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I wasn't making a reference to the frequency per second as it applies to RPM
( I didn't list RPM).

I was just stressing the extreme of his example (2 MPH to 200 MPH) to highlight
the effective mass, inertia, and job of the valve springs to control all of that
reciprocating weight.

But in any case, you're correct. Sorry for the confusion.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.