Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Traditional split, 2 , 4, 6 Degrees between intake and exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2005, 09:01 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Question Traditional split, 2 , 4, 6 Degrees between intake and exhaust

Looking for theories and experiences on Intake and Exhaust duration splits for traditional split cams.

Futral tends to use 2 degree split. Tony (AFR) likes 4 degrees, etc…

What is the science behind the magic???

Thanks for input…
Old 08-13-2005, 08:21 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Old 08-13-2005, 08:56 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The science is to keep a 75>80% exhaust flow potential Vs intake.
Old 08-13-2005, 09:38 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
The science is to keep a 75>80% exhaust flow potential Vs intake.
75-85% of intake potential??? That sounds like reverse-split, I am talking about traditional split, i.e. 224/228, 230/232, etc....
Old 08-13-2005, 09:40 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Not on exhaust system but on head intake VS head exhaust runner potentials.
Old 08-13-2005, 09:42 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Not on exhaust system but on head intake VS head exhaust runner potentials.

75-85% of intake potential??? That sounds like reverse-split, I am talking about traditional split, i.e. 224/228, 230/232, etc....
Old 08-13-2005, 10:20 AM
  #7  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Scott,

Just an FYI....I dont simply grind every cam I spec out with a 4' split. A lot of variables come into play. Total duration, application, type of exhaust system, idle quality I'm searching for, etc., just to name a few.

To simplify things, had I put a smaller exh. lobe on your cam, you would have made a little less peak power and slightly more in the middle. Also, your idle would have been a hair smoother due to less overlap. Seeing as we were trying to fatten the peak portion of your power band, I left more of a foward split in it to help evacuate the cylinder at high RPM when there is so little time to do so. It's all a give and take, not to mention a little bit of educated guesswork unless you had the opportunity to run every cam in question on an engine dyno.

Hope this helps...
Old 08-13-2005, 10:37 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thank you sir... just always looking for my next experiment...

Old 08-13-2005, 11:02 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
75-85% of intake potential??? That sounds like reverse-split, I am talking about traditional split, i.e. 224/228, 230/232, etc....
What I meant is :
Let us say that cam X flows Y amount of air through the head intake runner
So ideally the Exhaust flow amount capability should be 75>80% of the
value Y.
So you base your splits to achieve this value or close to it while maximizing HP as Tony said.
Old 08-13-2005, 02:22 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (47)
 
John02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great question! I'm looking at the TR 230/236 and was curious on the 6 degree split. So a split like this would make more power up top then a 230/232, but lose some in the midrange?

John
Old 08-13-2005, 03:26 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
Ed Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

Gee... I'm sorry...

Last edited by Ed Curtis; 08-13-2005 at 04:19 PM.
Old 08-13-2005, 03:45 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by EDC
Please remember....

The .050" spec is only one spec on a lobe! There are a hell of a lot more parameters...

As for the amount split... forward? reverse? at what point?

It all depends on the overall combination and the usage...

There is no "magic formula"... So if you really want a custom designed camshaft versus a shelf piece, you need all the data to do it...

Maybe there is a blue pill that will help though...

Ed
That is the best technical advice and/or theory you can give???
Old 08-13-2005, 04:53 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by EDC
Gee... I'm sorry...
I was not trying to be a AZZ, and I understand you are in business and a business needs to make money. I am just looking for theories and experiences to help build my own ideas and opinions and plans…. I don't want someone’s proprietary information or material...

Thanks though…
Old 08-14-2005, 02:16 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Old 08-15-2005, 06:44 PM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Step,

Don't take it to personally Ed's response was as close to a good answer as you can get. I spend a lot of time trying to turn what I know into something the average guy can understand but I/E splits and the why of them is like me trying to explain how to go thru a slalom section of a autoX fast... I know how to do both of them but for the life of me can't explain it as well as I can do it.

Bret
Old 08-15-2005, 08:53 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Step,

Don't take it to personally Ed's response was as close to a good answer as you can get. I spend a lot of time trying to turn what I know into something the average guy can understand but I/E splits and the why of them is like me trying to explain how to go thru a slalom section of a autoX fast... I know how to do both of them but for the life of me can't explain it as well as I can do it.

Bret

Well I an engineer and all my undergraduate work was concentrated in math, so let us pretend I can understand all those fancy numbers the "average guy" cannot ... if your are not going to post real material why post at all....
Old 08-16-2005, 06:53 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
Ed Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Exclamation

Originally Posted by SideStep
Well I an engineer and all my undergraduate work was concentrated in math, so let us pretend I can understand all those fancy numbers the "average guy" cannot ...
If you are this "genius" engineer, then you don't need any information...

if your are not going to post real material why post at all....
Already took care of that post...

Ed
Old 08-16-2005, 08:30 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks.. I appreciate you cleaning that up for me...

Just because someone has the ability to comprehend does not mean they have had the exposure. That is what I am asking for... material, experiences, theories and opinions on the subject... Not "It is just too complicated to explain" to the average guy (what ever that means).....

Last edited by SideStep; 08-17-2005 at 05:28 PM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.